Treatment of Rotator Cuff Tears With Platelet Rich Plasma
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Illinois
-
Glenview, Illinois, United States, 60025
- Illinois Sportsmedicine and Orthopaedic Centers
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Rotator cuff pathology established by exam
- Rotator cuff pathology confirmed with MRI.
- Failure to improve with activity modification and physical therapy
- Willingness to stop all NSAID medication
Exclusion Criteria:
- Additional significant shoulder pathology seen on xray or MRI including: severe arthritis, significant superior labrum anterior postierior (SLAP) Type II lesions and intra-articular loose bodies.
- Shoulder surgery within 6 months.
- Presence of full thickness rotator cuff tears in patients amenable to surgical repair.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Treatment Group
Dual injections of PRP - 4 ml injected into each location.
The first injection was into the supraspinatus tendon insertion critical zone and bursal area with the patient seated.
The second injection was performed with the patient prone into the glenohumeral intra-articular space under the supraspinatus tendon at, or just proximal to, the superior equator of the humeral head.
|
Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) prepared from patient blood, spun twice to concentrate platelets.
45 cc of initial blood resulting in 4cc of injectable PRP.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (Quick-DASH)
Time Frame: change from baseline to 6 months
|
Quick-DASH questionnaire consists of 11 questions which are each scored 1-5.
The scoring ranges from 0 for best to 100 for worst outcomes.
|
change from baseline to 6 months
|
|
Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (Quick-DASH)
Time Frame: change from baseline to 12 months
|
Quick-DASH questionnaire consists of 11 questions which are each scored 1-5.
The scoring ranges from 0 for best to 100 for worst outcomes.
|
change from baseline to 12 months
|
|
Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (Quick-DASH)
Time Frame: change from baseline to 24 months
|
Quick-DASH questionnaire consists of 11 questions which are each scored 1-5.
The scoring ranges from 0 for best to 100 for worst outcomes.
|
change from baseline to 24 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain
Time Frame: change from baseline to 6 months
|
The Visual Analog Scale is a single question about current pain level.
Scoring ranges from 0 which is no pain to 100 which is worst possible pain.
|
change from baseline to 6 months
|
|
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain
Time Frame: change from baseline to 12 months
|
The Visual Analog Scale is a single question about current pain level.
Scoring ranges from 0 which is no pain to 100 which is worst possible pain.
|
change from baseline to 12 months
|
|
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain
Time Frame: change from baseline to 24 months
|
The Visual Analog Scale is a single question about current pain level.
Scoring ranges from 0 which is no pain to 100 which is worst possible pain.
|
change from baseline to 24 months
|
|
Global Improvement
Time Frame: change from baseline to 6 months
|
Global improvement is a single question about percent improved compared to before treatment where 0 is not improved and 100 is completely improved.
|
change from baseline to 6 months
|
|
Global Improvement
Time Frame: change from baseline to 12 months
|
Global improvement is a single question about percent improved compared to before treatment where 0 is not improved and 100 is completely improved.
|
change from baseline to 12 months
|
|
Global Improvement
Time Frame: change from baseline to 24 months
|
Global improvement is a single question about percent improved compared to before treatment where 0 is not improved and 100 is completely improved.
|
change from baseline to 24 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Chadwick Prodromos, MD, Illinois Sportsmedicine and Orthopaedic Centers
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2015RC
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.