Intensive Pediatric Group Intervention
Intensive Pediatric Group Intervention in a Curricularly-embedded Pro-bono Clinic
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Jamie B Hall, PT, DPT, PhD
- Phone Number: 573-884-7531
- Email: halljami@health.missouri.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Dana M Chole, PT, DPT
- Phone Number: 573-882-3561
- Email: choled@health.missouri.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Missouri
-
Columbia, Missouri, United States, 65211
- PhysZou-University of Missouri Department of Physical Therapy
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Ambulatory children 7-17 years old, children who are participating in emPOWER program
- GMFCS Levels I-III
- Able to follow 2-3 step directions
- English Speaking
Exclusion Criteria:
- Orthopedic surgery in the past year
- Significant visual impairment
- Significant hearing impairment
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
PhysZou emPOWER
Strength, power, and gait-based intervention for kids with cerebral palsy is embedded within a curricular pro-bono student physical therapy clinic.
The group will meet for 2 hours, 2 times per week for 15 weeks.
|
Each session will include a 10-minute game-based warm-up, 45 minutes of gait interventions to include treadmill and overground walking as well as other aerobic activities, 45 minutes of resistance training (power and strength training as appropriate for their individual goals), and a 10-minute cool-down incorporating yoga and breathing activities.
To ensure participants are exercising at the appropriate level of intensity, 1 repetition maximum measures will be used to determine the appropriate levels of resistance and heart rate monitors will be worn.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
1 Repetition Maximum (1-RM) Testing
Time Frame: Before PT intervention begins (week 1), midpoint of program (Week 7), and last week of program (week 15).
|
Particpants will complete strength testing of hip/knee extensors and plantarflexor muscle groups using a leg press, using 1 Rep max testing protocols, as outlined in Pontiff and moreau, 2022.
(PMID 35960137)
|
Before PT intervention begins (week 1), midpoint of program (Week 7), and last week of program (week 15).
|
|
10 meter walk test
Time Frame: Before PT intervention begins (week 1), midpoint of program (Week 7), and last week of program (week 15).
|
Walking speed test of 10 meter distance, completed in both conditions of self selected speed and fast gait speed
|
Before PT intervention begins (week 1), midpoint of program (Week 7), and last week of program (week 15).
|
|
Keiser Leg Press
Time Frame: Before PT intervention begins (week 1), midpoint of program (Week 7), and last week of program (week 15).
|
Assessment of lower extremity power
|
Before PT intervention begins (week 1), midpoint of program (Week 7), and last week of program (week 15).
|
|
Timed up and Down Stairs
Time Frame: Before PT intervention begins (week 1), midpoint of program (Week 7), and last week of program (week 15).
|
Functional measure of how quickly child can climb up and down 1 flight of stairs
|
Before PT intervention begins (week 1), midpoint of program (Week 7), and last week of program (week 15).
|
|
30 second sit to stands
Time Frame: Before PT intervention begins (week 1), midpoint of program (Week 7), and last week of program (week 15).
|
This is a clinical assessment of lower extremity strength, in which investigators count the number of repetitions of sit to stands completed in 30 seconds.
|
Before PT intervention begins (week 1), midpoint of program (Week 7), and last week of program (week 15).
|
|
30 second half kneel to stand
Time Frame: Before PT intervention begins (week 1), midpoint of program (Week 7), and last week of program (week 15).
|
This is a clinical assessment of lower extremity strength, in which investigators count the number of repetitions of half kneel to stand complete correctly in a 30 second time period.
|
Before PT intervention begins (week 1), midpoint of program (Week 7), and last week of program (week 15).
|
|
Lateral Step Ups
Time Frame: Before PT intervention begins (week 1), midpoint of program (Week 7), and last week of program (week 15).
|
This is a clinical assessment of lower extremity strength, in which investigators count the number of repetitions of lateral step ups completed in 30 seconds on a standard size 6 inch step.
|
Before PT intervention begins (week 1), midpoint of program (Week 7), and last week of program (week 15).
|
|
Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM-88)
Time Frame: Before PT intervention begins (week 1), midpoint of program (Week 7), and last week of program (week 15).
|
This is a criterion referenced measure of gross motor function and is valid and reliable for children with cerebral palsy.
It evaluates motor skills that are typical for normal development.
Dimensions D and E will be utilized, as these 2 sections assess the overall gross motor function in direct relation to standing, walking, running, and jumping.
|
Before PT intervention begins (week 1), midpoint of program (Week 7), and last week of program (week 15).
|
|
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure
Time Frame: Before PT intervention begins (week 1), midpoint of program (Week 7), and last week of program (week 15).
|
Evidence-based outcome measure designed to capture a client's self-perception of performance in goals they determine before intervention.
The measurement focuses on self-care, leisure activities, and productivity.
The participant rates their performance and their satisfaction with their performance on a scale from 1-10, with 1 indicating poor performance and low satisfaction, while 10 indicates very good performance and high satisfaction.
|
Before PT intervention begins (week 1), midpoint of program (Week 7), and last week of program (week 15).
|
|
Standing balance with eyes closed standing on firm surface
Time Frame: Before PT intervention begins (week 1), midpoint of program (Week 7), and last week of program (week 15).
|
Participants will stand on a force plate with eyes closed.
Postural control information is obtained from the investigators and the force plate tracks the center of pressure of the participant.
|
Before PT intervention begins (week 1), midpoint of program (Week 7), and last week of program (week 15).
|
|
Standing balance with eyes closed standing on firm surface
Time Frame: Before PT intervention begins (week 1), midpoint of program (Week 7), and last week of program (week 15).
|
Joint kinematics (movement strategies) obtained while eyes closed standing on firm surface
|
Before PT intervention begins (week 1), midpoint of program (Week 7), and last week of program (week 15).
|
|
Walking- single task
Time Frame: Before PT intervention begins (week 1), midpoint of program (Week 7), and last week of program (week 15).
|
Walking speed is obtained form spatial sensor
|
Before PT intervention begins (week 1), midpoint of program (Week 7), and last week of program (week 15).
|
|
Walking- single task
Time Frame: Before PT intervention begins (week 1), midpoint of program (Week 7), and last week of program (week 15).
|
Stride length obtained from spatial sensor
|
Before PT intervention begins (week 1), midpoint of program (Week 7), and last week of program (week 15).
|
|
Walking- cognitive dual task
Time Frame: Before PT intervention begins (week 1), midpoint of program (Week 7), and last week of program (week 15).
|
speed of walking will be obtained from spatial sensor while completing appropriate/salient cognitive dual task
|
Before PT intervention begins (week 1), midpoint of program (Week 7), and last week of program (week 15).
|
|
Walking- cognitive dual task
Time Frame: Before PT intervention begins (week 1), midpoint of program (Week 7), and last week of program (week 15).
|
stride length will be obtained from spatial sensor while completing appropriate/salient cognitive dual task
|
Before PT intervention begins (week 1), midpoint of program (Week 7), and last week of program (week 15).
|
|
5 Times sit to stand test
Time Frame: Before PT intervention begins (week 1), midpoint of program (Week 7), and last week of program (week 15).
|
time to complete and knee joint kinematics obtained from spatial sensor
|
Before PT intervention begins (week 1), midpoint of program (Week 7), and last week of program (week 15).
|
|
Step down
Time Frame: Before PT intervention begins (week 1), midpoint of program (Week 7), and last week of program (week 15).
|
knee joint kinematics obtained from spatial sensor while the participant steps down from a 6 inch curb step
|
Before PT intervention begins (week 1), midpoint of program (Week 7), and last week of program (week 15).
|
|
Jumping
Time Frame: Before PT intervention begins (week 1), midpoint of program (Week 7), and last week of program (week 15).
|
Production of power will be obtained from force plate and spatial sensor
|
Before PT intervention begins (week 1), midpoint of program (Week 7), and last week of program (week 15).
|
|
Jumping
Time Frame: Before PT intervention begins (week 1), midpoint of program (Week 7), and last week of program (week 15).
|
Assessment of knee joint kinematics during jumping will be obtained from force plate and spatial sensor
|
Before PT intervention begins (week 1), midpoint of program (Week 7), and last week of program (week 15).
|
|
Reaction time
Time Frame: Before PT intervention begins (week 1), midpoint of program (Week 7), and last week of program (week 15).
|
measurement of upper extremity reaching reaction
|
Before PT intervention begins (week 1), midpoint of program (Week 7), and last week of program (week 15).
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Perspectives of children and caregivers
Time Frame: Completion of program (Week 15)
|
Semi-structured interviews will provide researchers with the perspective of the children and caregivers who participated in this novel program.
|
Completion of program (Week 15)
|
|
Perspectives of children and caregivers
Time Frame: Completion of program (Week 15)
|
Open ended surveys will provide researchers with the perspective of the children and caregivers who participated in this novel program.
|
Completion of program (Week 15)
|
|
Perspectives of Doctor of Physical Therapy Students
Time Frame: Completion of program (week 15)
|
Open ended surveys will provide researchers and faculty with the perspective of the learning opportunity from the students
|
Completion of program (week 15)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Ambuehl M, van Hedel HJA, Labruyere R. Pediatric Rehabilitation Therapies Differ in Intensity: A Pilot Study to Highlight the Implications for Dose-Response Relationships. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Mar;99(3):224-232. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001323.
- Bjornson KF, Moreau N, Bodkin AW. Short-burst interval treadmill training walking capacity and performance in cerebral palsy: a pilot study. Dev Neurorehabil. 2019 Feb;22(2):126-133. doi: 10.1080/17518423.2018.1462270. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
- Hedgecock JB, Harris NM, Rapport MJ. Changing Practice: Clinical Application of Resistance Training Evidence for Children With Cerebral Palsy. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2023 Jul 1;35(3):367-376. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000001023.
- Oudenhoven LM, van Vulpen LF, Dallmeijer AJ, de Groot S, Buizer AI, van der Krogt MM. Effects of functional power training on gait kinematics in children with cerebral palsy. Gait Posture. 2019 Sep;73:168-172. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.06.023. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
- van Vulpen LF, de Groot S, Rameckers E, Becher JG, Dallmeijer AJ. Improved Walking Capacity and Muscle Strength After Functional Power-Training in Young Children With Cerebral Palsy. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017 Sep;31(9):827-841. doi: 10.1177/1545968317723750. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
- Pontiff M, Moreau NG. Safety and Feasibility of 1-Repetition Maximum (1-RM) Testing in Children and Adolescents With Bilateral Spastic Cerebral Palsy. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2022 Oct 1;34(4):472-478. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000941. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2113446
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.