A Follow-on Study for Second-Eye Treatment for Participants Previously Treated With Gene Therapy for X-Linked Retinitis Pigmentosa (XLRP)

August 27, 2026 updated by: Janssen Research & Development, LLC

An Open-label, Multicenter, Phase 2 Follow-on Study for Second Eye Treatment of Patients Previously Treated With a Recombinant Adeno-associated Virus Vector (AAV5 hRKp.RPGR) for Gene Therapy of Adults and Children With X-linked Retinitis Pigmentosa Owing to Defects in Retinitis Pigmentosa GTPase Regulator (RPGR)

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and tolerability of subretinal delivery of Adeno-associated Virus Vector (AAV5 hRKp.RPGR) gene therapy in adults and children with X-linked retinitis pigmentosa.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
24

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United Kingdom
      • London, United Kingdom, EC1V 2PD
        • Moorfields Eye Hospital
  • United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48105
        • University of Michigan Kellogg Eye Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Have been treated with AAV5-hRKp.RPGR in study MGT009 and have completed or is currently enrolled in Study MGT010
  • Must sign an informed consent form indicating that they understand the purpose and procedures of the study and is willing to participate in the study
  • Willing to adhere to the protocol and long-term follow-up

Exclusion Criteria:

- There are no specific exclusion criteria to enroll in this study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Cohort 1
Participants will receive a dose of AAV5 hRKp.RPGR under the retina (low-dose or intermediate-dose) on Day 1 depending on the dosage administered in study MGT009 (NCT03252847) in the past. After receiving the treatment, participants will be assessed for safety.
Biological: AAV5-hRKp.RPGR
AAV5-hRKp.RPGR will be administered sub-retinally.
Other Names:
  • JNJ-74765340, botaretigene sparoparvovec
Experimental: Cohort 2
Participants will receive the treatment dose of AAV5 hRKp.RPGR under the retina (low-dose or intermediate-dose) on Day 1 in the second eye once the safety will be determined in Cohort 1.
Biological: AAV5-hRKp.RPGR
AAV5-hRKp.RPGR will be administered sub-retinally.
Other Names:
  • JNJ-74765340, botaretigene sparoparvovec
Other: Cohort 3
The participants who are not willing to undergo surgery or are not eligible for surgery will be assessed in this cohort. They will be assessed yearly until 5 years after their initial eye surgery in previous study MGT009.
Other: No intervention (Follow-Up assessment)
Participants will not receive any intervention and will undergo follow-up assessment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE)
Time Frame: From baseline up to 5.5 years
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a pharmaceutical (investigational or non investigational) product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the intervention. An AE can be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational or non investigational) product, whether or not related to that medicinal (investigational or non investigational) product.
From baseline up to 5.5 years
Change from Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Chart Letter Scores
Time Frame: Baseline, Months 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60
Change from baseline in BCVA by ETDRS chart letter scores in monocular assessment of the second treated eye will be assessed. BCVA was measured using the ETDRS Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved and vice-versa.
Baseline, Months 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60
Change from Baseline in Low Luminance Visual Acuity (LLVA) by ETDRS Chart Letter Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Months 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60
Change in LLVA by ETDRS chart letter scores from baseline in monocular assessment of second treated eye will be assessed. Visual function assessments included LLVA assessment in each eye by ETDRS letters. The letter score ranges from 0 (worse score) to 100 (best score), and a gain in LLVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.
Baseline, Months 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in Mean Retinal Sensitivity Within the Central 10 Degrees (MRS10)
Time Frame: Baseline, Months 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60
Change from baseline in MRS10 in static perimetry of the second treated eye will be measured.
Baseline, Months 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60
Change from Baseline in Mean Retinal Sensitivity Within the Full Visual Field (MRS90)
Time Frame: Baseline, Months 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60
Change from baseline in MRS90 in static perimetry of the second treated eye will be assessed.
Baseline, Months 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60
Change from Baseline in the Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) Domain Scores
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12
LLQ is a 32-item disease-specific questionnaire to assess self reported visual problems under low luminance and at night. The range of responses is different for different questions, with the overall pattern being that "1" means "No difficulty at all" and that increasingly higher numbers mean increasingly more difficult.
Baseline, Month 12
Change in Retinal Function as Assessed by Pointwise Response in Static Perimetry
Time Frame: From Month 12 up to Month 60
Pointwise response in static perimetry within the full visual field in the second treated eye will be assessed.
From Month 12 up to Month 60
Change in Retinal Function as Assessed by Pointwise Response in Static Perimetry Within Central 30 Degrees Visual Field
Time Frame: From Month 12 up to Month 60
Pointwise response in static perimetry within the central 30 degrees visual field in the second treated eye will be assessed.
From Month 12 up to Month 60
Change from Baseline in Low Luminance Visual Acuity (LLVA) by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Chart Letter Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Months 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60
Change in LLVA by ETDRS chart letter scores from baseline in monocular assessment of second treated eye will be assessed. Visual function assessments included LLVA assessment in each eye by ETDRS letters. The letter score ranges from 0 (worse score) to 100 (best score), and a gain in LLVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.
Baseline, Months 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60
Change from Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by ETDRS Chart Letter Scores
Time Frame: Baseline, Months 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60
Change from baseline in BCVA by ETDRS chart letter scores in monocular assessment of the second treated eye will be assessed. BCVA was measured using the ETDRS Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved and vice-versa.
Baseline, Months 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial, Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 10, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 24, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 24, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 16, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 16, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 17, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 28, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 27, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 74765340RPG2001 (Other Identifier: Janssen Research & Development, LLC)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The data sharing policy of Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine is available at innovativemedicine.jnj.com/our-innovation/clinical-trials/transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project site at yoda.yale.edu

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings