Evaluation, in Humans, of the Correlation Between Hepatotoxicity, Neurotoxicity Induced by Oxaliplatin, and Blood Levels of HMGB1 (HEPATOXALI)

October 17, 2024 updated by: University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Oesogastric and pancreatic adenocarcinomas are poor-prognosis cancers. Incidence of pancreatic cancer drastically increases to such an extent that it will become the second cause of cancer's mortality by 2030. A major challenge is to optimize the therapies for localized setting, when oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy is the standard, before and after surgical excision. Because in 50% of cases oxaliplatin triggers a grade 2-3 sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) which increases post-operative morbidity, decreases histological response to chemotherapy, increases tumor recurrence, and aggravates the risk of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN).

There is an urgent need to better understand the biological processes involved in SOS, in order to prevent and treat it without stopping or reducing oxaliplatin administration.

The biological link between oxaliplatin and SOS has not been described, but recent murine experiments argue for HMGB1 to be the mediator released after exposure to oxaliplatin and inducing SOS, and thereafter CIPN. To date, no biomarker is established between murine and patient analyses, and the release of HMGB1 after oxaliplatin treatment and its effect on hepatic parenchyma is not described in patients. Investigators hypothesized is that HMGB1 would also been increased in patients after oxaliplatin treatment, and correlated to the development of SOS and CIPN. If confirmed, personalized treatment will be possible to target this pathway.

Therefore, investigators propose to dynamically explore this hypothesis in localized oesogastric and pancreatic cancer patients who will be routinely managed by an initial laparoscopy and post-oxaliplatin surgical excision.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ECOG WHO Performance status = 0 or 1
  • Signed and dated informed consent
  • Patients with histological diagnosis of oesogastric or pancreatic adenocarcinoma
  • Resectable tumors
  • Patients able to have a laparoscopy
  • In case of absence of peritoneal invasion on the laparoscopy, patient candidate to a chemotherapy schedule by FLOT or FOLFOX in perioperative setting for oesogastric adenocarcinoma, or FOLFIRINOX in perioperative setting for pancreatic adenocarcinoma
  • Registration in a national health care system (CMU included)
  • Patient speak and understand the french

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Histology other than adenocarcinoma
  • Metastatic disease
  • History of previous treatment with oxaliplatine
  • History of systemic chemotherapy administration within 5 years prior to inclusion,
  • Patient with an non balanced progressive condition/disease (liver failure, renal failure (creatinine clearance <30mL/min), respiratory failure, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction in the last 6 months, etc.),
  • Patient on curative dose anticoagulant,
  • Patient with complete dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency (Uracilemia ≥ 150 ng/ml),
  • Patient not operable for the pathology concerned,
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman, woman of childbearing age who has not performed a pregnancy test before the procedure,
  • Patient with legal incapacity (person deprived of liberty or under curatorship, stutorship, safeguard of justice),
  • Patient who, for psychiatric, social, family or geographical reasons, cannot be followed and/or comply with the requirements of the study,,
  • Discovery of peritoneal invasion during the peritoneal exploratory of the laparoscopy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: comparate the Serum HMGB1 concentrations between patients with grade <2 SOS and those with grade 2,3
Biological: assess the serum HMGB1 concentrations before and after an oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy
assess the serum HMGB1 concentrations

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Serum HMGB1 concentrations
Time Frame: At exploratory laparoscopy and at the surgery
Assess Serum HMGB1 concentrations in two groups of patients : with grade 0 or 1 SOS and with grade ≥2 SOS, at two timepoints: before exploratory laparoscopy and before surgical excision to determinate the effect of HMGB1 on SOS development
At exploratory laparoscopy and at the surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
variation of serum HMGBI concentration (ng/ml)
Time Frame: at the exploratory laparoscopy, at the first (Day1) and last cycle (assessed up to 75 days) of chemotherapy before surgery (each cycle=14 days) and at the surgery
mesurated the serum HMGB1 concentration (ng/ml) at several time of treatment of the patient then comparated these assess the dynamic variation of serum HMGB1 concentrations after oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in oesogastric and pancreatic cancer patients with grade 0 or 1 SOS and with grade ≥2 SOS
at the exploratory laparoscopy, at the first (Day1) and last cycle (assessed up to 75 days) of chemotherapy before surgery (each cycle=14 days) and at the surgery
variation of serum RAGE (receptor of HMGBI) concentration
Time Frame: at the exploratory laparoscopy, at the first (Day1) and last cycle (assessed up to 75 days) of chemotherapy before surgery (each cycle=14 days) and at the surgery
mesurated the serum RAGE concentration (ng/ml) at several time of treatment of the patient then comparated these assess the dynamic variation of serum HMGB1 concentrations after oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in oesogastric and pancreatic cancer patients with grade 0 or 1 SOS and with grade ≥2 SOS
at the exploratory laparoscopy, at the first (Day1) and last cycle (assessed up to 75 days) of chemotherapy before surgery (each cycle=14 days) and at the surgery
sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) diagnosis
Time Frame: before to began chemotherapy and from 15 to 21 days after the last cycle of chemotherapy before surgery
compare SOS histology diagnosis (absent, mild, moderate, severe) with no invasive biological scores "APRI and FIB4"which use ASAT (U/L), ALAT(U/L), plaquettes (G/L) and the age (years) of the patient
before to began chemotherapy and from 15 to 21 days after the last cycle of chemotherapy before surgery
sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) diagnosis
Time Frame: before to began chemotherapy and from 15 to 21 days after the last cycle of chemotherapy before surgery
compare SOS histology diagnosis (absent, mild, moderate, severe)) with splenic's volumetric measured by radiological's assessment
before to began chemotherapy and from 15 to 21 days after the last cycle of chemotherapy before surgery
Evaluated the chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN)
Time Frame: at the first (Day1) and last cycle (assessed up to 75 days) of chemotherapy before surgery (each cycle=14 days); at the surgery and at the first cycle (D1) then last cycle (assessed up to 75 days) after surgery
the CIPN will be evaluate by the investigator who used the CTCAEv5 classification.
at the first (Day1) and last cycle (assessed up to 75 days) of chemotherapy before surgery (each cycle=14 days); at the surgery and at the first cycle (D1) then last cycle (assessed up to 75 days) after surgery
Evaluated the chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN)
Time Frame: at the first (Day1) and last cycle (assessed up to 75 days) of chemotherapy before surgery (each cycle=14 days); at the surgery and at the first cycle (D1) then last cycle (assessed up to 75 days) after surgery
the CIPN will be evaluate by each patient who completed the CIPN20 questionnary
at the first (Day1) and last cycle (assessed up to 75 days) of chemotherapy before surgery (each cycle=14 days); at the surgery and at the first cycle (D1) then last cycle (assessed up to 75 days) after surgery
Evaluated the chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN)
Time Frame: at the first (Day1) and last cycle (assessed up to 75 days) of chemotherapy before surgery (each cycle=14 days); at the surgery and at the first cycle (D1) then last cycle (assessed up to 75 days) after surgery
the CIPN will be evaluate by each patient who completed the visual analog score for pain
at the first (Day1) and last cycle (assessed up to 75 days) of chemotherapy before surgery (each cycle=14 days); at the surgery and at the first cycle (D1) then last cycle (assessed up to 75 days) after surgery
Predictive value of HMGB1 for the development of SOS and CIPN
Time Frame: from exploratory laparoscopy to last cycle of chemotherapy after surgery assessed up to 10 month
Correlate CIPN, neuropathic pain with SOS, HMGB1, and RAGE measurements
from exploratory laparoscopy to last cycle of chemotherapy after surgery assessed up to 10 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Marine JARY, MD, CHU Estaing de Clermont Ferrand/FRANCE

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 6, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 30, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 5, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 17, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 17, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • RBHP 2023 JARY
  • 2023-A02427-38 (Other Identifier: registration number with the French drug agency)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Adenocarcinoma

Clinical Trials on assess the serum HMGB1 concentrations before and after an oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings