Thermal Ablation Versus Parathyroidectomy for Secondary Hyperparathyroidism
Thermal Ablation Versus Parathyroidectomy for Secondary Hyperparathyroidism: a Multicenter Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Yang Liu
- Phone Number: +8616601565730
- Email: yang2818025107@163.com
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- persistent serum iPTH (intact parathyroid hormone) levels > 800 pg/mL;
- resistance to calcimimetics, vitamin D, and its analogs, with ineffective conventional internal medicine comprehensive treatment;
- severe bone pain, osteoporosis, muscle pain, ectopic soft tissue calcification, or other factors affecting quality of life;
- imaging examinations indicating the presence of at least one enlarged parathyroid gland
Exclusion Criteria:
- severe bleeding tendency or coagulation disorders, severe cardiopulmonary abnormalities, and abnormal vital signs such as severe hypertension, arrhythmias, and anemia
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Therma ablation
|
Thermal ablation is a treatment for secondary hyperparathyroidism.
There are radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA).
For RFA, an electrode needle is inserted into the parathyroid under imaging guidance.
High - frequency current heats the tissue to cause necrosis.
MWA uses electromagnetic waves to generate heat by friction.
Before ablation, imaging and lab tests are done for evaluation.
During the process, precise positioning and real - time monitoring are key.
After that, patients are observed for bleeding, swelling and other symptoms, and tests are repeated to assess the effect.
|
|
Parathyroidectomy
|
Parathyroidectomy for secondary hyperparathyroidism is a common approach.
The surgeon first makes an incision in the neck area under general or local anesthesia.
Then, the enlarged parathyroid glands are carefully identified and dissected.
Precise surgical skills are required to avoid damaging nearby structures such as the recurrent laryngeal nerve and blood vessels.
After the removal of the abnormal parathyroid tissue, the wound is closed.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Achievement rate of target PTH value
Time Frame: 6 months after surgery or ablation
|
6 months after surgery or ablation
|
|
|
Symptom remission rate
Time Frame: 1 year after treatment
|
The symptom remission rate refers to the proportion of the number of patients whose symptoms have been alleviated to the total number of patients treated in the treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism, either by surgery or ablation.
|
1 year after treatment
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
complication rate
Time Frame: within 30 days after surgery or ablation
|
The incidence rate of complications refers to the proportion of patients who experience complications after a surgical procedure within a certain period.
|
within 30 days after surgery or ablation
|
|
Normalization Probability of Serum Calcium and Phosphorus after Ablation or Surgery
Time Frame: 6 months post-treatment
|
The probability of normal serum calcium and serum phosphorus levels after ablation or surgical treatment for primary hyperparathyroidism is defined as the proportion of patients in whom the levels of blood calcium and blood phosphorus return to the normal physiological range among all the patients who have received either ablation or surgical procedures for this condition.
|
6 months post-treatment
|
|
Bone mineral density change
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Bone mineral density change after treatment is defined as the alteration in bone density measured by DEXA in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism after surgery or ablation.
|
2 years
|
|
All - cause mortality rate
Time Frame: 2 years
|
2 years
|
|
|
Assessment of Changes in Bone Metabolism Markers Including BALP, PINP, and ALP for Treating Primary Hyperparathyroidism by Surgery and Ablation
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Changes in Bone Metabolism Markers will be evaluated by measuring specific biochemical parameters.
These include serum levels of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP), which is a biomarker reflecting osteoblast activity.
Another important marker is N-terminal propeptide of type I collagen (PINP), which is involved in collagen synthesis and provides insights into bone formation.
ALP is a well-known enzyme related to bone metabolism and its elevation can be indicative of increased osteoblastic activity.
The levels of these markers will be determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits, which are highly sensitive and specific laboratory assays.
|
1 year
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Cosmetology Scoring(Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating Scale)
Time Frame: at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year post-procedure
|
The Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating Scale (SCAR) will be utilized to evaluate the cosmetic outcome following surgical or ablation treatment for primary hyperparathyroidism.
The observer part of the SCAR assesses six aspects: scar spread, erythema, pigmentation abnormality, surgical marks or suture tracks, hypertrophy/atrophy, and overall impression.
The patient part includes two simple questions about patient satisfaction with the scar and the degree of itching.
The scale has a minimum value of 0, representing the least severe scar with the best cosmetic appearance, and a maximum value of 15, signifying the most severe scar with the poorest cosmetic result.
Higher scores on this scale indicate a worse cosmetic outcome.
|
at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year post-procedure
|
|
Readmission Rate within 30 Days
Time Frame: within 30 days after surgery or ablation
|
within 30 days after surgery or ablation
|
|
|
Evaluation of the Learning Curve for Surgical and Ablation Procedures in Treating Primary Hyperparathyroidism: Incorporating Key Performance Indicators and Patient Cure Outcomes
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 year
|
The learning curve for surgical or ablation procedures will be evaluated by tracking and analyzing key performance indicators, with patient cure outcomes also taken into account.
These indicators encompass the time taken from the start of the procedure until its completion (operation time).
Additionally, the rate of occurrence of immediate and short-term post-operative complications (like bleeding, nerve injury) is considered.
Patient cure status, such as complete remission of related symptoms, normalization of relevant physiological indicators, and long-term disease-free survival, will be meticulously assessed to comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness and learning the effectiveness and learning curve of these procedures.
|
through study completion, an average of 2 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- S2024-11-10
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Efficacy and Safety
-
NCT06123832Active, not recruiting
-
NCT05776550Active, not recruitingEfficacy | Safety
-
NCT06732427Recruiting
-
NCT06690424Completed
-
NCT06596057Active, not recruitingSafety and Efficacy
-
NCT02018250Completed
-
NCT05140616RecruitingSafety and Efficacy
-
NCT04785170Completed
-
NCT04284215Unknown
Clinical Trials on Thermal ablation
-
NCT07242820Not yet recruitingColorectal Cancer | Polyp of Colon
-
NCT07645378Not yet recruitingCervical Neoplasia | HPV | Cervical Precancer | HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus)
-
NCT07645352Not yet recruitingCervical Neoplasia | HPV | Cervical Precancer | HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus)
-
NCT07390916Not yet recruitingHPV | Cervical Precancer | HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus)
-
NCT07130019Not yet recruiting
-
NCT07468695Not yet recruitingHPV | Cervical Precancer | HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus)
-
NCT05472311Recruiting
-
NCT05611359Not yet recruitingPancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
-
NCT06609876RecruitingHepatocellular Carcinoma | Recurrent Tumor | Microwave Ablation | Donafenib
-
NCT06610604Recruiting