Thermal Ablation Versus Parathyroidectomy for Secondary Hyperparathyroidism

November 26, 2024 updated by: Ping Liang, Chinese PLA General Hospital

Thermal Ablation Versus Parathyroidectomy for Secondary Hyperparathyroidism: a Multicenter Study

Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT), which is frequently associated with chronic kidney disease, leads to problems such as bone pain, fractures, and cardiovascular issues, thereby affecting patients' quality of life. This clinical trial is designed to compare the efficacy of thermal ablation and surgical treatment for SHPT. Parameters including parathyroid hormone levels, serum calcium and phosphorus levels, SHPT-related symptoms (for example, bone pain, muscle weakness), and complication occurrence will be monitored. The advantages involve enabling better treatment decisions for patients, enhancing patients' quality of life, and alleviating the burden on families, in addition to augmenting the clinical knowledge of healthcare providers. However, both treatments carry risks. Thermal ablation may have problems like incomplete ablation, local tissue damage, and blood parameter changes. Surgical risks comprise bleeding, infection, adjacent tissue damage (such as the recurrent laryngeal nerve), and hypoparathyroidism. The investigators will strive to minimize these risks. This trial is of great significance for SHPT treatment, and the investigators welcome participants to contribute to the advancement of medical science in this area.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

612

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients must have a confirmed diagnosis of secondary hyperparathyroidism based on clinical symptoms (such as bone pain, fractures, pruritus), biochemical parameters (elevated parathyroid hormone, abnormal calcium, phosphorus, and alkaline phosphatase levels), and relevant medical history (especially those with underlying chronic kidney disease or other relevant disorders). All patients must provide written informed consent after a detailed discussion of the study purpose, procedures, potential risks, and benefits of both treatment options by the research team.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • persistent serum iPTH (intact parathyroid hormone) levels > 800 pg/mL;
  • resistance to calcimimetics, vitamin D, and its analogs, with ineffective conventional internal medicine comprehensive treatment;
  • severe bone pain, osteoporosis, muscle pain, ectopic soft tissue calcification, or other factors affecting quality of life;
  • imaging examinations indicating the presence of at least one enlarged parathyroid gland

Exclusion Criteria:

  • severe bleeding tendency or coagulation disorders, severe cardiopulmonary abnormalities, and abnormal vital signs such as severe hypertension, arrhythmias, and anemia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Therma ablation
Thermal ablation is a treatment for secondary hyperparathyroidism. There are radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA). For RFA, an electrode needle is inserted into the parathyroid under imaging guidance. High - frequency current heats the tissue to cause necrosis. MWA uses electromagnetic waves to generate heat by friction. Before ablation, imaging and lab tests are done for evaluation. During the process, precise positioning and real - time monitoring are key. After that, patients are observed for bleeding, swelling and other symptoms, and tests are repeated to assess the effect.
Parathyroidectomy
Parathyroidectomy for secondary hyperparathyroidism is a common approach. The surgeon first makes an incision in the neck area under general or local anesthesia. Then, the enlarged parathyroid glands are carefully identified and dissected. Precise surgical skills are required to avoid damaging nearby structures such as the recurrent laryngeal nerve and blood vessels. After the removal of the abnormal parathyroid tissue, the wound is closed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Achievement rate of target PTH value
Time Frame: 6 months after surgery or ablation
6 months after surgery or ablation
Symptom remission rate
Time Frame: 1 year after treatment
The symptom remission rate refers to the proportion of the number of patients whose symptoms have been alleviated to the total number of patients treated in the treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism, either by surgery or ablation.
1 year after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
complication rate
Time Frame: within 30 days after surgery or ablation
The incidence rate of complications refers to the proportion of patients who experience complications after a surgical procedure within a certain period.
within 30 days after surgery or ablation
Normalization Probability of Serum Calcium and Phosphorus after Ablation or Surgery
Time Frame: 6 months post-treatment
The probability of normal serum calcium and serum phosphorus levels after ablation or surgical treatment for primary hyperparathyroidism is defined as the proportion of patients in whom the levels of blood calcium and blood phosphorus return to the normal physiological range among all the patients who have received either ablation or surgical procedures for this condition.
6 months post-treatment
Bone mineral density change
Time Frame: 2 years
Bone mineral density change after treatment is defined as the alteration in bone density measured by DEXA in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism after surgery or ablation.
2 years
All - cause mortality rate
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Assessment of Changes in Bone Metabolism Markers Including BALP, PINP, and ALP for Treating Primary Hyperparathyroidism by Surgery and Ablation
Time Frame: 1 year
Changes in Bone Metabolism Markers will be evaluated by measuring specific biochemical parameters. These include serum levels of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP), which is a biomarker reflecting osteoblast activity. Another important marker is N-terminal propeptide of type I collagen (PINP), which is involved in collagen synthesis and provides insights into bone formation. ALP is a well-known enzyme related to bone metabolism and its elevation can be indicative of increased osteoblastic activity. The levels of these markers will be determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits, which are highly sensitive and specific laboratory assays.
1 year

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cosmetology Scoring(Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating Scale)
Time Frame: at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year post-procedure
The Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating Scale (SCAR) will be utilized to evaluate the cosmetic outcome following surgical or ablation treatment for primary hyperparathyroidism. The observer part of the SCAR assesses six aspects: scar spread, erythema, pigmentation abnormality, surgical marks or suture tracks, hypertrophy/atrophy, and overall impression. The patient part includes two simple questions about patient satisfaction with the scar and the degree of itching. The scale has a minimum value of 0, representing the least severe scar with the best cosmetic appearance, and a maximum value of 15, signifying the most severe scar with the poorest cosmetic result. Higher scores on this scale indicate a worse cosmetic outcome.
at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year post-procedure
Readmission Rate within 30 Days
Time Frame: within 30 days after surgery or ablation
within 30 days after surgery or ablation
Evaluation of the Learning Curve for Surgical and Ablation Procedures in Treating Primary Hyperparathyroidism: Incorporating Key Performance Indicators and Patient Cure Outcomes
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 year
The learning curve for surgical or ablation procedures will be evaluated by tracking and analyzing key performance indicators, with patient cure outcomes also taken into account. These indicators encompass the time taken from the start of the procedure until its completion (operation time). Additionally, the rate of occurrence of immediate and short-term post-operative complications (like bleeding, nerve injury) is considered. Patient cure status, such as complete remission of related symptoms, normalization of relevant physiological indicators, and long-term disease-free survival, will be meticulously assessed to comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness and learning the effectiveness and learning curve of these procedures.
through study completion, an average of 2 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

November 26, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 26, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 10, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 29, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • S2024-11-10

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Efficacy and Safety

Clinical Trials on Thermal ablation

Subscribe