Study of the Clinical Benefits of Different Formulations of Amphotericin B

October 15, 2024 updated by: Rui Yang, Qianfoshan Hospital
This project intends to carry out a multi-center retrospective observational real-world study to understand the current status of amphotericin B use by formulation type, compare the differences in safety and efficacy of each formulation in domestic clinical application, provide real-world evidence for clinical drug selection, and provide evidence-based evidence in support of rational clinical drug use.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

The researchers selected patients with amphotericin B use records discharged from five tertiary hospitals across the country from January 1, 2020 to the present, extracted data according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and divided them into experimental and control groups, in order to understand the current status of amphotericin B use in each preparation type, compare the differences in the safety and efficacy of the various preparations in the domestic clinical application, and provide real-world evidence of the choice of clinical medication.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

184

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Shandong
      • Jinan, Shandong, China
        • Rui Yang,MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with documented amphotericin B use discharged from 5 tertiary care hospitals across the country from January 1, 2020 to the present were selected for the study to exclude patients with missing key information for the study and were divided into experimental and control groups for the study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients discharged from January 1, 2020 to the present;
  2. Patients with a record of amphotericin B use.

Exclusion Criteria:

1.Key information missing from patient studies.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Experimental Group
Liposomal Amphotericin B for Injection (Ampicillin®)
Control Group
Liposome of Amphotericin B for Injection (Fungoxone®), Cholesteryl Sulfate Complex of Amphotericin B for Injection (Amphotericin®), Amphotericin B for Injection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Adverse Reaction Rate
Time Frame: Through study completion,up to half a year.
The incidence of total adverse reactions was analyzed to assess the difference in safety of amphotericin B by formulation type in domestic clinical application, to provide real-world evidence for clinical drug selection, and to provide evidence-based evidence in support of rational clinical drug use.
Through study completion,up to half a year.
Pathogen clearance rate
Time Frame: Through study completion,up to half a year.
To assess the differences in effectiveness of amphotericin B by formulation type in domestic clinical application by analyzing the pathogen clearance rate, to provide real-world evidence for clinical dosing selection, and to provide evidence-based evidence to support rational clinical dosing.
Through study completion,up to half a year.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rui Yang, MD, Qianfoshan Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 3, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 9, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 17, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 15, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Efficacy

Subscribe