Keratinized Tissue Augmentation Using Porcine Collagen Matrix (Mucoderm®) Around Dental Implant
Keratinized Tissue Augmentation Using Porcine Collagen Matrix (Mucoderm®) Around Dental Implant: A Randomized Clinical Study
Aim of the Study To evaluate the using of porcine collagen matrix for keratinized tissue augmentation around delayed dental implant.
Primary Outcome:
Peri-implant keratinized mucosal width and thickness following the use of porcine collagen matrix using (Mucoderm®-Botiss gmbh) compared to the gold standard FGG augmentation.
Secondary Outcome:
- Crestal bone change (CBC)
- Pocket depth (PD)
- Bleeding on probing (BOP)
- Plaque index (PI) PICOT
P: Population:
Patient with suitable ridge dimension for delayed implant placement.
I: Intervention:
Implant insertion followed by porcine collagen matrix soft tissue augmentation
C: Control:
Autogenous FGG
O: Outcomes
- Enhancing keratinized mucosal width and thickness
Evaluating :
- Crestal bone change (CBC)
- perimplant Pocket depth (PD)
- Bleeding on probing (BOP)
- Plaque index (PI)
- Modified PES. T: Time A 6 months follow up .
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Giza, Egypt, 00202
- Misr University for Science and Technology
-
-
NJ
-
Giza, NJ, Egypt, 08989
- Misr University for Science and Technology
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
1- Partially or fully edentulous sites with previous implant placed in posterior maxillary or mandibular areas.
2- Inadequate keratinized tissue ≤2 3- Patient age ranged from 20 to 45 years old for both genders. 4- Submerged Osteointegrated implants with no sings of inflammation before implant insertion.
5- Optimal compliance as evidenced by no missed treatment appointments and positive attitude toward oral hygiene.
Exclusion Criteria:
- 1- Smokers 2- Pregnant or lactating female 3- Treatment with any systemic drug that could affect wound healing (ex- corticosteroids ) 4- History of systemic disease affect wound healing ex diabetes 5- Patient with bruxism and parafunctional habits. 6- Limited inter arch restoration space.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: KTW augmentation using FGG
KTW augmentation using apically positioned flap combined with FGG from palatal mucosa
|
the study is done to patient who lacks of keratinized mucosa width by apically positioned flap and using of FGG as gold standard and Mucoderm as compartive group
|
|
Experimental: KTW augmentation using porcine collagen matrix
KTW augmentation using apically positioned flap combined with porcine collagen matrix
|
the study is done to patient who lacks of keratinized mucosa width by apically positioned flap and using of FGG as gold standard and Mucoderm as compartive group
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Keratinized mucosa width
Time Frame: 1 month , 3 month , 6 months follow up
|
before the operation reading , immediately after operation , 1 month follow up , 3 months follow up and 6 months follow up the reading will done using periodontal probe |
1 month , 3 month , 6 months follow up
|
|
keratinized tissue thickness
Time Frame: 1 month , 3 month , 6 months follow up
|
measures the Keratinized tissue thickness using periodontal probe
|
1 month , 3 month , 6 months follow up
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
probing depth for adjacent teeth
Time Frame: 6 months
|
probing depth for adjacent teeth
|
6 months
|
|
bleeding on probingn
Time Frame: 1 month , 3 month , 6 months follow up
|
bleeding on probing for this patient is mesure using papillary bleeding index.
|
1 month , 3 month , 6 months follow up
|
|
crestal bone loss around dental implant
Time Frame: 1 month , 3 month , 6 months follow up
|
measuring crestal bone loss around implant using CBCT and periapical xray
|
1 month , 3 month , 6 months follow up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- KTW Managment
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.