Keratinized Tissue Augmentation Using Porcine Collagen Matrix (Mucoderm®) Around Dental Implant

December 21, 2024 updated by: ahmed amer

Keratinized Tissue Augmentation Using Porcine Collagen Matrix (Mucoderm®) Around Dental Implant: A Randomized Clinical Study

Aim of the Study To evaluate the using of porcine collagen matrix for keratinized tissue augmentation around delayed dental implant.

Primary Outcome:

Peri-implant keratinized mucosal width and thickness following the use of porcine collagen matrix using (Mucoderm®-Botiss gmbh) compared to the gold standard FGG augmentation.

Secondary Outcome:

  1. Crestal bone change (CBC)
  2. Pocket depth (PD)
  3. Bleeding on probing (BOP)
  4. Plaque index (PI) PICOT

P: Population:

Patient with suitable ridge dimension for delayed implant placement.

I: Intervention:

Implant insertion followed by porcine collagen matrix soft tissue augmentation

C: Control:

Autogenous FGG

O: Outcomes

  • Enhancing keratinized mucosal width and thickness
  • Evaluating :

    1. Crestal bone change (CBC)
    2. perimplant Pocket depth (PD)
    3. Bleeding on probing (BOP)
    4. Plaque index (PI)
    5. Modified PES. T: Time A 6 months follow up .

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

this study aiming to augment KMW with FGG and MUCODERM following apically positioned flap the primary outcomes to measure is KMW and MT

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Giza, Egypt, 00202
        • Misr University for Science and Technology
    • NJ
      • Giza, NJ, Egypt, 08989
        • Misr University for Science and Technology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1- Partially or fully edentulous sites with previous implant placed in posterior maxillary or mandibular areas.

    2- Inadequate keratinized tissue ≤2 3- Patient age ranged from 20 to 45 years old for both genders. 4- Submerged Osteointegrated implants with no sings of inflammation before implant insertion.

    5- Optimal compliance as evidenced by no missed treatment appointments and positive attitude toward oral hygiene.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1- Smokers 2- Pregnant or lactating female 3- Treatment with any systemic drug that could affect wound healing (ex- corticosteroids ) 4- History of systemic disease affect wound healing ex diabetes 5- Patient with bruxism and parafunctional habits. 6- Limited inter arch restoration space.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: KTW augmentation using FGG
KTW augmentation using apically positioned flap combined with FGG from palatal mucosa
the study is done to patient who lacks of keratinized mucosa width by apically positioned flap and using of FGG as gold standard and Mucoderm as compartive group
Experimental: KTW augmentation using porcine collagen matrix
KTW augmentation using apically positioned flap combined with porcine collagen matrix
the study is done to patient who lacks of keratinized mucosa width by apically positioned flap and using of FGG as gold standard and Mucoderm as compartive group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Keratinized mucosa width
Time Frame: 1 month , 3 month , 6 months follow up

before the operation reading , immediately after operation , 1 month follow up , 3 months follow up and 6 months follow up

the reading will done using periodontal probe

1 month , 3 month , 6 months follow up
keratinized tissue thickness
Time Frame: 1 month , 3 month , 6 months follow up
measures the Keratinized tissue thickness using periodontal probe
1 month , 3 month , 6 months follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
probing depth for adjacent teeth
Time Frame: 6 months
probing depth for adjacent teeth
6 months
bleeding on probingn
Time Frame: 1 month , 3 month , 6 months follow up
bleeding on probing for this patient is mesure using papillary bleeding index.
1 month , 3 month , 6 months follow up
crestal bone loss around dental implant
Time Frame: 1 month , 3 month , 6 months follow up
measuring crestal bone loss around implant using CBCT and periapical xray
1 month , 3 month , 6 months follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

July 25, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 16, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • KTW Managment

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

after thesis discussion we will decide

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Keratinized Mucosa

Clinical Trials on Alloderm

Subscribe