Effect of Lidocaine and Ozone in Injection for Myofascial Pain
Comparison of the Efficacy of Lidocaine and Ozone in Masticatory Muscle Injections for Patients With Myofascial Pain
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Fatih
-
Istanbul, Fatih, Turkey, 34083
- Istanbul Medipol University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- No temporomandibular joint treatment within the last year.
- Presence of palpable trigger points in the unilateral/bilateral masseter muscle.
- Classified as ASA 1 or ASA 2.
- Chronic pain in the masseter muscle for at least the past three months.
- Presence of at least two palpable trigger points in the unilateral or bilateral masseter muscle, with a pain score of ≥ 3 on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) upon palpation
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of allergy to any anesthetic agent.
- Use of anticoagulant medications.
- Use of analgesics, muscle relaxants, or antidepressants within the last month.
- Diagnosed with specific conditions such as migraine, neuromuscular junction disorders, fibromyalgia, depression, or schizophrenia.
- History of trauma, tumor, or surgery in the head-neck region.
- Presence of skin infection in the relevant area.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Streaming of patients and administration of substances
60 patients with myofascial pain syndrome who met the inclusion criteria were divided into four groups into isotonic saline, lidocaine, ozone gas and ozonated isotonic saline.
Then the injections were done for each group.
|
Patients who had injections were asked to mark their headache severities with a survey includes six questions about their past 4 weeks.
The test applied preoperatively, postoperatively 1st and 3rd months.
Patients who had injections were asked to reply some questions about their sleeping habits for past 4 weeks.
The test applied preoperatively, postoperatively 1st and 3rd months.
Patients who had injections are asked to state their pain with a 10 cm visual analogue scale preoperatively and postoperatively 1st,2nd weeks and 1st and 3rd months.
1 ml of insulin needle with a 27-gauge ½ inch 13 mm needle tip will be injected into up to 4 trigger points in the taut bands that cause the most pain in the masseter muscle.
Injections were done at most 3 times.
As the control group, the first group was injected with isotonic saline; the second group was injected with 2% lidocaine without vasoconstrictor; the third group with ozone gas; and the fourth group with ozonated isotonic saline.
|
|
Experimental: Repetition of tests at certain intervals
Quality of life was evaluated by administering PSQI and HIT-6 tests at postoperative 1st and 3rd months.
|
Patients who had injections were asked to mark their headache severities with a survey includes six questions about their past 4 weeks.
The test applied preoperatively, postoperatively 1st and 3rd months.
Patients who had injections were asked to reply some questions about their sleeping habits for past 4 weeks.
The test applied preoperatively, postoperatively 1st and 3rd months.
Patients who had injections are asked to state their pain with a 10 cm visual analogue scale preoperatively and postoperatively 1st,2nd weeks and 1st and 3rd months.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
1. The pain assessment after injections
Time Frame: Three months
|
The primary outcome was the Visual Analog Score (VAS), a simple tool that allows the patient to express pain visually and numerically and is particularly effective in measuring subjective sensations.
The patient is asked to choose a number between 0 and 10 indicating the pain level, with 0 indicating the least pain and 10 indicating the most pain.
|
Three months
|
|
2. Headache evaluation after injections
Time Frame: Three months
|
The second outcome was the Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6), which is used to assess headaches.
6 indicates the lowest score, and 13 indicates the highest score.
|
Three months
|
|
3. Sleep quality evaluation after injections
Time Frame: Three months
|
The third outcome was the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), consists of 7 main components and a total of 19 questions.
Each component is scored from 0 to 3; the total PSQI score ranges from 0 to 21. High scores indicate a decrease in quality of life while descending scores indicate an increase.
|
Three months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: ÇAĞRI DELİLBAŞI, PROF., Medipol universitesi diş hastanesi
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Kamanli A, Kaya A, Ardicoglu O, Ozgocmen S, Zengin FO, Bayik Y. Comparison of lidocaine injection, botulinum toxin injection, and dry needling to trigger points in myofascial pain syndrome. Rheumatol Int. 2005 Oct;25(8):604-11. doi: 10.1007/s00296-004-0485-6. Epub 2004 Sep 15.
- Yilmaz O, Sivrikaya EC, Taskesen F, Pirpir C, Ciftci S. Comparison of the Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin, Local Anesthesia, and Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections in Patients With Myofascial Trigger Points in the Masseter Muscle. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Jan;79(1):88.e1-88.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.09.013. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
- Albagieh H, Aloyouny A, Alshehri N, Alsammahi N, Almutrafi D, Hadlaq E. Efficacy of lidocaine versus mepivacaine in the management of myofascial pain. Saudi Pharm J. 2020 Oct;28(10):1238-1242. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2020.08.014. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- IstanbulMUH-DF-YM-02
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.