Irinotecan Liposomes Combined With Bevacizumab in the Treatment of Recurrent Glioma (NALIRIBVRG)

January 24, 2025 updated by: Zhifeng Tian,MD

Exploratory Study of Irinotecan Liposomes Combined With Bevacizumab in the Treatment of Progressive or Recurrent Glioma

With the optimization of the dosage form of irinotecan, the replacement of ordinary irinotecan with irinotecan liposomes should improve the safety and the expected efficacy. Therefore, an exploratory study on the treatment progress of irinotecan liposomes combined with bevacizumab for recurrent brain glioma should be conducted. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of irinotecan liposomes combined with bevacizumab in the treatment of progressive/recurrent brain glioma, so as to provide more treatment options for patients with brain glioma.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study was to observe the efficacy and safety of irinotecan liposomes combined with bevacizumab in the treatment of progressive/recurrent brain glioma. The study was a single-center, single-arm, prospective study. Patients with progressive/recurrent glioma who met the inclusion criteria and did not meet the exclusion criteria were treated with irinotecan liposome combined with beizumab. The optimal ORR of patients during treatment was mainly evaluated, and the DCR, DoR, PFS, OS, and safety of patients were mainly evaluated.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
38

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Zhejiang
      • Lishui, Zhejiang, China, 323000
        • Recruiting
        • The Central Hospital of Lishui City
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-75 years old;
  • Patients diagnosed with glioma by histology, patients with progress in first-line therapy, including postoperative recurrence, progress in first-line standard therapy, and patients unable to undergo surgery/radiotherapy;
  • no previous treatment with irinotecan or irinotecan liposomes;
  • At least one measurable or evaluable lesion according to RANO criteria;
  • ECOG score is 0~1;
  • Good bone marrow and organ function: ① Neutrophils (ANC) ≥1.5×109/L, platelets (PLT) ≥100×109/L, hemoglobin (Hb) ≥90g/L, white blood cells (WBC) ≥3.0×109/L, albumin (ALB) ≥32 g/L, and no bleeding tendency; ② AST, ALT and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were all ≤2.5× upper limit of normal range (ULN), and ≤5×ULN when liver metastases occurred; Total bilirubin ≤1.5×ULN; Serum creatinine (Cr) ≤1.5×ULN or creatinine clearance ≥60 ml/min (calculated according to Cockroft-Gault);
  • Expected survival ≥3 months;
  • Can understand the situation of this study, patients and (or) legal representatives voluntarily agree to participate in this study and sign informed consen;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients allergic to the investigational drug and its excipients;
  • Known or suspected central nervous system metastasis;
  • The use of potent depressants or inducers of CYP3A, CYP2C8, and UGT1A1 (anticonvulsants [phenytoin, phenobarbital, or carbamazepine], rifampicin, rifambutin, St.John's.) could not be discontinued or were not discontinued within 2 weeks prior to enrollment Wort], grapefruit juice, clarithromycin, itraconazole, Lopinavir, Nefazodone, Nelfinavir, Ritonavir, Saquinavir, Terrapivir, voriconazole, Azanavir, Gefilozil, indinavir, etc.);
  • There are signs and symptoms of intestinal obstruction;
  • have had other malignant tumors within the past 5 years or currently, except for cured cervical carcinoma in situ, uterine carcinoma in situ and non-melanoma skin cancer;
  • Pregnant or lactating female patients, patients of childbearing age who refuse to accept contraceptive measures;
  • Patients considered by the investigator to be unsuitable for this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Irinotecan liposome combined with bevacizumab
Irinotecan liposomes, 50mg/m2, d1, 90 min intravenously, Q2W; Bevacizumab 10mg/kg, d1, Q2W;
Drug: Irinotecan liposome combined with bevacizumab
Irinotecan liposomes, 50mg/m2, d1, 90 min intravenously, Q2W; Bevacizumab 10mg/kg, d1, Q2W;

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Objective response rate
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of one year
The proportion of patients with optimal tumor response, complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) assessed based on the RECIST v1.1 criteria
From date of randomization until the date of one year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 24 months
The time between the start of treatment and the first recorded death
From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 24 months
Progression free survival
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 24 months
The time from the start of treatment to the first recording of PD or death, whichever occurs first
From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Zhifeng Tian,MD

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Zhifeng Tian, The Central Hospital of Lishui City

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 8, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 15, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 15, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 24, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 24, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 24, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2024(I)-107-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

At the end of the test, the decision is made according to the test results

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings