The Effect of Stress Ball Use on Stress, Sleep Quality and Comfort Levels (Stress Ball)
The Effect of Stress Ball Use on Stress, Sleep Quality, and Comfort Levels in Hemodialysis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Muğla, Turkey, 48000
- Turkey, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- participants had to be volunteers
- aged 18 years and older,
- undergoing hemodialysis treatment for at least six months,
- attending hemodialysis sessions three times a week,
- not having any conditions that would impede the use of a stress ball.
Exclusion Criteria:
- individuals who refused to participate in the study,
- those undergoing hemodialysis for less than six months,
- patients attending hemodialysis sessions twice a week,
- individuals with health problems that prevented them from using a stress ball.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: stress ball
the stress ball intervention was initiated.
Before starting, the researcher provided instructions and demonstrations on how to use the stress ball, allowing then the patients to practice.
The stress ball intervention was administered during the second hour of the hemodialysis session when patients were most comfortable.
Patients were instructed to squeeze the stress ball once, counting internally as "1-2-3" with each squeeze.
The stress ball intervention was administered three times weekly during hemodialysis sessions for 15 minutes each session, totaling 12 sessions for a period of four weeks.
Throughout the intervention, patients were observed by the same researcher.
|
the stress ball intervention was initiated.
Before starting, the researcher provided instructions and demonstrations on how to use the stress ball, allowing then the patients to practice.
The stress ball intervention was administered during the second hour of the hemodialysis session when patients were most comfortable.
Patients were instructed to squeeze the stress ball once, counting internally as "1-2-3" with each squeeze.
The stress ball intervention was administered three times weekly during hemodialysis sessions for 15 minutes each session, totaling 12 sessions for a period of four weeks.
Throughout the intervention, patients were observed by the same researcher.
|
|
No Intervention: Control
No intervention will be made to the contro group, only data will be collected at the same time as the study group.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Stress evaluated using the Perceived Stress Scale
Time Frame: Change from before implementation and 4th week of practice
|
The obtainable total score from the scale ranges from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating a greater perception of stress
|
Change from before implementation and 4th week of practice
|
|
Sleep quality ewaluated the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Time Frame: Change from before implementation and 4th week of practice
|
The sum of the scores from these seven components yields the total PSQI score, which ranges from 0 to 21.
Individuals with a total score of 5 or lower are classified as having 'good" sleep quality, while those with a score above 5 are classified as having "poor" sleep quality.
|
Change from before implementation and 4th week of practice
|
|
Comfort evaluated using Hemodialysis Comfort Scale Version II
Time Frame: Change from before implementation and 4th week of practice
|
The total score obtained from the scale ranges from 26 to 130, with higher scores indicating greater comfort levels.
|
Change from before implementation and 4th week of practice
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ayse Kacaroglu Vicdan, Associate Professor, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Universty
- Study Chair: Dilek Dilek Gibyeli Genek, Assisstant Professor, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Universty
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- MuglaSitkiKocmanUniversity
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- ICF
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.