Chester Step Test: is It Effective in Scleroderma Patients?

February 28, 2025 updated by: Havvagül Doğan, Firat University

Proving the Efficacy of the Chester Step Test in Scleroderma Patients Compared with the 6-Minute Walk Test

Systemic sclerosis (SSC) is a chronic autoimmune disease in which autoimmune features are associated with vascular manifestations. Patients with SSC experience many problems such as interstitial lung disease (ILD), pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), heart failure, severe gastrointestinal tract (GIT) involvement and scleroderma renal crisis (SRC). Because of these problems, SSC patients may develop an abnormal pulmonary hemodynamic response during exercise. In this situation, measuring the aerobic capacity of SSC patients can be a useful tool for health promotion. There are many different methods for measuring aerobic capacity tests. The most commonly used aerobic capacity test in SSC patients is the 6-minute walk test (6 MWT). However, although the 6 MWT is a commonly used test, it has some disadvantages. Because SSC affects multiple organs, there are doubts about the 6 MWT's ability to accurately assess these diseases. These disadvantages of the 6MWT have led to the search for new tests. The Chester step test (CST) is a submaximal test and a good option to assess aerobic capacity. An adapted version of the CST for non-healthy individuals can be used to assess aerobic capacity. There are some studies conducted with CST. As a result of my research, no study evaluating CST in individuals with SSC was found.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Systemic sclerosis (SSC) is a chronic autoimmune disease with autoimmune features combined with vascular manifestations. Systemic sclerosis (SSC), the main symptom of which is skin sclerosis, is a marker that can detect the activity of the disease. Apart from skin involvement, SSC affects many internal organs such as the musculoskeletal system, gastrointestinal system, lungs, heart and kidneys. Because of these problems, SSC patients may develop an abnormal pulmonary hemodynamic response during exercise. This can lead to symptoms of dyspnea, fatigue and decreased exercise tolerance. In this situation, measuring the aerobic capacity of SSC patients can be a useful tool in health promotion. There are many different methods for measuring aerobic capacity tests. The most commonly used aerobic capacity test in SSC patients is the 6-minute walk test (6 MWT). However, although the 6 MWT is a commonly used test, it has some disadvantages. Because SSC affects multiple organs, there are doubts about the 6 MWT's ability to accurately assess these diseases. For an accurate 6MWT assessment, a 30 meter corridor is needed. This length of corridor is impossible to access in some clinics. These disadvantages of the 6MWT have led to the search for new tests. The Chester step test (CST) is a submaximal test and a good option for assessing aerobic capacity. Compared to 6 MWT, CST has the advantage of requiring portable equipment. It is a cost-effective option to assess exercise tolerance, fatigue and dyspnea. Because of these advantages of the CST, it can be used to assess aerobic capacity when adapted to non-healthy individuals. There are some studies conducted with CST. As a result of my research, no study evaluating CST in individuals with SSC was found. The study will be conducted at Firat University Hospital and 45 patients will be evaluated. After the demographic data of the patients included in the study are recorded, 6MWT will be performed and the results will be recorded. Then CST will be performed and the results will be recorded.6 Dyspnea, fatigue and leg fatigue will be evaluated with the Modified Borg Scale before and after MWT and CST. The patient's heart rate, oxygen saturation and blood pressure will be recorded before and after the tests. In addition, the patient's heart rate and oxygen saturation will be recorded after each level passed in CST.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
45

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Turkey
    • Elazığ
      • Merkez, Elazığ, Turkey, 23000

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Over 18 years old
  • Patients who can walk independently without an assistive device

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • Myocardial infarction history
  • Congestive heart failure
  • Serious or unstable illness that may limit exercise tolerance
  • Presence of severe musculoskeletal and joint disorders that may interfere with the conduct of the test
  • Inability to perform the simplest level of the Chester step test
  • Arthroplasty or major operations on knee and hip joints
  • Uncontrolled hypertension
  • Lack of ability to understand and implement all recommended procedures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Evaluated Group
6 minute walk test, Chester step test
Other: Evaluation
Comparison of the 6-minute walk test and Chester step test, one of the aerobic capacity tests

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified Borg Scale
Time Frame: up to 30 minutes
The modified Borg scale is a validated scale for subjective perception of dyspnea used with the 6MWT to confirm the degree of respiratory distress. Exercise intensity is determined by individualized measurement. The 2002 guidelines of the American Thoracic Society recommend the modified Borg scale as an adjunct to the 6MWT. This scale is a vertical scale measured from 0 to 10. Here 0 represents no symptoms and 10 represents maximum symptoms. In this study, the modified Borg scale will be used to rate dyspnea and leg fatigue. The Borg scale will be printed out and this printout will be used for patient enumeration. The patient will be told what the numbers from 0 to 10 on the Borg scale mean. After instructions have been given, the patient will be asked to rate dyspnea and leg fatigue before and after the test and the numbers will be recorded.
up to 30 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Firat University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 11, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 15, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 15, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 28, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 28, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 28, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2025/03-16

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings