BXCL501 After Stress to Increase Recovery Success (RISE)

April 9, 2026 updated by: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Prevention/Reduction of ASRs and PTSD to Sustain Civilian Performance With a Sublingual Formulation of Dexmedetomidine (BXCL501)

This study will examine the safety and efficacy of BXCL501 to reduce ASR symptoms and behavioral changes among patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) after Motor Vehicle Collision (MVC). Specifically, the investigators will perform the BXCL501 (BASIS) Trial, a double-blind placebo-controlled Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) to determine if BXCL501 (dexmedetomidine hydrochloride sublingual film) initiated in the ED in the hours after MVC to high risk individuals, treats/reduces ASR/ASD symptoms (primary outcome), improves neurocognitive function, and prevents/reduces posttraumatic stress (PTS) symptoms (secondary outcomes) long term. 100 participants will be randomized, receive study drug in ED and be discharged with a 2-week drug supply. Prior to initial dose of study drug administration, and during the hours, days, and weeks after participants will receive serial longitudinal assessments of psychological and somatic symptoms, neurocognitive function, and adverse events.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

U.S. military personnel are exposed to life-threatening traumatic events (e.g., intense firefights with multiple casualties) that result in acute stress reaction (ASR) symptoms (ICD-10) and posttraumatic stress (PTS). Similarly, acute and persistent stress symptoms, and related adverse posttraumatic neuropsychiatric sequelae, are also very common and cause a tremendous burden of suffering in civilian populations following exposure to life-threatening traumatic events (e.g., motor vehicle collision, violent or accidental death of a loved one, and assault). BXCL501 (dexmedetomidine HCl sublingual film) has been evaluated in multiple clinical trials across a range of medical conditions (dementia, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, opioid use disorder), with an excellent safety profile, and evidence of efficacy with respect to decreasing agitation. This is promising for the treatment of ASRs, as agitation is a primary feature of ASRs in many individuals. Additionally, adrenergic hyperactivity is also a key characteristic of ASRs and contributes to the development of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). BXCL501 is known to decrease the activity of central noradrenergic neurons, suggesting a mechanistic pathway by which BXCL501 may improve outcomes for individuals at risk of ASR/ASD/PTSD. BXCL501 therefore holds significant promise as a treatment aimed at reducing ASR symptoms and related behavioral changes, enhancing resilience and improving warfighter performance, and reducing the frequency and severity of persistent/chronic PTS symptoms. This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of BXCL501 in a population of trauma survivors at high risk for developing ASR, ASD, and PTSD symptoms, and may ultimately provide military personnel, veterans, and civilians with an important new treatment option to improve recovery, job performance, and quality of life when administered in the early aftermath of exposure to a traumatic stressor.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32209
        • Recruiting
        • University of Florida College of Medicine - Jacksonville
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sophia Sheikh, MD
    • Missouri
      • St Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Washington University in St. Louis
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Stacey House, MD
    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22908
        • Recruiting
        • UVA University Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Glass George, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. ≥ 18 years and ≤ 65 years of age
  2. Admitted to ED within 72 hours of MVC
  3. Anticipated to be discharged home from the ED
  4. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
  5. Consent to receive unencrypted communications
  6. Has a smartphone with continuous service for ≥ 1 year
  7. Has a personal email address they regularly access
  8. Able to speak and read English
  9. Females of childbearing potential (not surgically sterilized (tubal ligation/hysterectomy) or not post-menopausal (no menstrual period for > 12 months)) must be willing to use a medically acceptable and effective birth control method for 3 months before the study and while participating in the study. Medically acceptable methods of contraception that may be used by the participant include abstinence, birth control pills or patches, birth control implants, diaphragm, intrauterine device (IUD), or condoms

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Substantial comorbid injury (e.g., long bone fracture)
  2. People of childbearing potential who are pregnant, breastfeeding, planning to become pregnant, or not using a highly effective form of contraception (e.g., implants, intrauterine devices (IUDs), tubal ligation, hormonal birth control pills, patches, vaginal rings, or injections) during their participation
  3. Prisoner status
  4. Chronic daily opioid use prior to MVC (> 20 mg oral daily morphine equivalents)
  5. Bipolar disorder, psychotic disorder, active psychosis, suicidal ideation, or homicidal ideation
  6. Hospital admission
  7. Clinically significant history of cardiac disease including (a) history of syncope or other syncopal attacks; (b) current evidence of orthostatic hypotension (defined as a decrease in systolic BP of 20 mm Hg or decrease in diastolic BP of 10mm Hg within 3 minutes); (c) resting heart rate of <55 beats per minute; (d) systolic blood pressure <110mmHg or diastolic BP <70mmHg; (e) participants with a QTC interval >440msec (males) or >460msec (females) not in sinus rhythm; or 1st, 2nd or 3rd degree hearth block; or (f) history of severely impaired ventricular function (ejection fraction < 30%).
  8. Hypomagnesia (<1.7 mg/dL) or hypokalemia (< 3.0 mEq/L)
  9. Substantial hepatic impairment (e.g. AST or ALT > 3 times the upper limit of normal or history of cirrhosis).
  10. Currently taking the following medications: a) medications for alcoholism (e.g. naltrexone, disulfiram, topiramate, acamprosate); b) psychotropic medications that promote sedation including sedative/hypnotics, barbiturates, antihistamines, sedative antidepressants (e.g. doxepin, mirtazapine, trazodone), and triptans (e.g., sumatriptan); c) alpha-2-adrenergic agonists (clonidine, guanfacine, lofexidine); d) adrenergic agents prescribed for other reasons (prazosin); e) or medications known to cause QT prolongation. (Permitted Concomitant Medications: The concomitant medications allowed in the study include non-sedative antidepressants used to treat PTSD)
  11. Hypersensitivity or history of allergic reaction to dexmedetomidine
  12. Lacking capacity to provide informed consent (receipt of sedative, hypnotic agent making the patient non-decisional for consent)
  13. Any other history or condition that would, in the site investigator's judgement, indicate that the patient would very likely be non-compliant with the study or unsuitable for the study (e.g., might interfere with the study, confound interpretation, or endanger patient)
  14. Participation in any other clinical trial of a pharmacological agent within 30 days prior to screening.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: BXCL501 (dexmedetomidine HCl)
Participants will be instructed to take an initial dose of BXCL501 (equivalent to 1 film, 120mcg) in the ED as part of enrollment procedures. If the time between the first dose and the planned bedtime of the participant is greater than 6 hours, participants will be instructed to take the second dose at bedtime on the day of enrollment. If the time between the first dose and the planned bedtime of the participant is less than 6 hours participants will be instructed to take the second dose before bedtime on the day following enrollment. Following the initial dosing on the day of enrollment, all participants will be instructed to take a dose of study medication before bedtime until they have completed 14 days of treatment.
Drug: BXCL501 (dexmedetomidine HCl)
BXCL501 (dexmedetomidine HCl) taken sublingually (under the tongue) in the ED and at bedtime over 2 weeks.
Other Names:
  • BXCL501
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Participants will be instructed to take an initial dose of placebo (equivalent to 1 film, 120mcg) in the ED as part of enrollment procedures. If the time between the first dose and the planned bedtime of the participant is greater than 6 hours, participants will be instructed to take the second dose at bedtime on the day of enrollment. If the time between the first dose and the planned bedtime of the participant is less than 6 hours participants will be instructed to take the second dose before bedtime on the day following enrollment. Following the initial dosing on the day of enrollment, all participants will be instructed to take a dose of study medication before bedtime until they have completed 14 days of treatment.
Drug: Placebo
Placebo taken sublingually (under the tongue) in the ED and at bedtime over 2 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in ASD Score
Time Frame: Week 1, 3 after MVC
Individuals are asked to complete the 14-item Acute Stress Disorder Scale (ASDS) self-report inventory where each item is rated on a 5-point scale (0= Not at all; 1= Mildly; 2= Medium; 3= Quite a bit; 4= Very Much) that indexes acute stress disorder (ASD). Range of possible total scores is 0-56, with higher total scores indicating greater acute stress symptoms.
Week 1, 3 after MVC

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Median reaction time of correct responses (general cognitive function)
Time Frame: Min 30, Hour 1, 6, 12, Day 1, 2, 3, Week 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 11, 12 after MVC
General cognitive function will be assessed using the Test My Brain Digit Symbol Matching Test. Participants will be asked to match symbols and numbers using a symbol-number key shown on screen. General cognitive function is assessed via measuring median reaction time of correct responses (medianRTc) to 'test' trials. Range for medianRTc (ms) is 0-30000.
Min 30, Hour 1, 6, 12, Day 1, 2, 3, Week 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 11, 12 after MVC
Median reaction time of correct responses (procedural reaction time)
Time Frame: Min 30, Hour 1, 6, 12, Day 1, 2, 3, Week 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 11, 12 after MVC
Procedural reaction time will be assessed using the Test My Brain Choice Reaction Time Test. Participants see a set of three arrows, where one arrow is a different color from the rest. The participant presses left or right to indicate the direction of the odd colored arrow. Reaction time is assessed via measuring median reaction time of correct responses (medianRTc) to 'test' trials. Range for medianRTc (ms) is 0-5000.
Min 30, Hour 1, 6, 12, Day 1, 2, 3, Week 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 11, 12 after MVC
Proportion of targets correctly identified (visuospatial processing and attention)
Time Frame: Min 30, Hour 1, 6, 12, Day 1, 2, 3, Week 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 11, 12 after MVC
Visuospatial processing and attention will be assessed using the Test My Brain Multiple Object Tracking Test. In this test of visuospatial processing and attention, participants have to track a set of target circles around the screen (amidst a field of distractors) that move at increasing speed with each trial. Once the circles stop moving, participants select which were targets must identify targets instead of distractors. Visuospatial processing and attention are assessed via the proportion of targets correctly identified. Range for measure is 0-1.
Min 30, Hour 1, 6, 12, Day 1, 2, 3, Week 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 11, 12 after MVC
Change in Pain Symptom Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, 3, 6, 12 after MVC
The Regional Pain Scale (RPS) will be used to assess the extent of body pain. 13 items will be scored on a 0-10 pain scale where 0 is no pain and 10 is severe pain. Range of possible total scores is 0-130, with higher total scores indicative of greater pain symptoms
Baseline, Week 1, 3, 6, 12 after MVC
Change in Depressive Symptoms Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, 3, 6, 12 after MVC
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression Short Form 8b; an 8-item scale, and one question from the PROMIS Depression Item Bank will be aggregated/combined to assess depression. Each item is scored on a 5-point scale where 0 is "none of the time" and 5 means "all or almost all of the time". Range of possible total scores is 0-45, with higher total scores indicative of greater depressive symptoms.
Baseline, Week 1, 3, 6, 12 after MVC
Change in PTSD Symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, 3, 6, 12 after MVC
The PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) assesses PTSD symptoms as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5th Edition (DSM-5). 20 items will be scored on a five-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("extremely"). Range of possible total scores is 0-80, with higher total scores indicative of greater PTSD symptoms.
Baseline, Week 1, 3, 6, 12 after MVC
d-prime identification (psychomotor vigilance)
Time Frame: Min 30, Hour 1, 6, 12, Day 1, 2, 3, Week 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 11, 12 after MVC
Psychomotor vigilance will be assessed via the Test My Brain Gradual Onset Continuous Performance Test. In this task, participants monitor a stream of city and mountain images that rapidly fade from one to the next with no interstimulus interval. Participants are asked to press/touch for each city image and to withhold for each mountain image. Vigilance is assessed via measuring d-prime for identification of each city image, a signal detection-based measure that takes into account both hits and false alarms to provide an unbiased estimate of performance where higher values reflect better performance. Response inhibition is defined as the suppression of actions that are inappropriate in a given context. Response inhibition is assessed using results from the above, by measuring the number of commission errors (failure to withhold responses) where most positive scores reflect more impulsive responding. Range for measure is -4.2279 to 4.2279.
Min 30, Hour 1, 6, 12, Day 1, 2, 3, Week 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 11, 12 after MVC
Change in Somatic Symptom Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, 3, 6, 12 after MVC
The Pennebaker Inventory of Limbic Languidness (PILL) assesses the frequency of common physical symptoms and sensations. The investigators will use a version with adapted response options for greater consistency across measures, greater precision in response levels, and to allow administration via self-report. 20 items will be scored on a 0-10 scale where 0 is "no problem" and 10 means "major problem". Range of possible total scores is 0-200, with higher total scores indicative of greater somatic symptoms.
Baseline, Week 1, 3, 6, 12 after MVC

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Washington University School of Medicine
United States Department of Defense
University of Florida
Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR)
Rhode Island Hospital
Mclean Hospital
Vanderbilt University School of Medicine

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Samuel McLean, MD, University of North Carollina at Chapel Hill
  • Principal Investigator: Stacey House, MD, Washington University School of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 23, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 29, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 29, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 15, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 16, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 24, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 14, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 9, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 25-0345

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 12 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC).

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 12 months following publication and continuing for 36 months.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Investigator has approved IRB, IEC, or REB and an executed data use/sharing agreement with UNC.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings