Pyrocarbon Hemiarthroplasty Versus Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis
Hemiarthroplasty Versus Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis: The Impact of Modern Implant Options
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Missouri
-
St Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
- Washington University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Fluent in English language
- Willing to sign an informed consent form
- Willing to comply with all study procedures and be available for the duration of the study
- Age 40 to 65 years
- In good general health as evidenced by medical history
- Surgical indication of glenohumeral osteoarthritis 7. In the opinion of the surgeon, there is clinical equipoise for the subject to be implanted with a humeral hemiarthroplasty with pyrocarbon or anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of Walch Type C or D glenoid
- Presence of a glenoid that could not be reconstructed with the anatomic glenoid resurfacing components
- Presence of extreme preoperative glenoid deformity including uniplanar retroversion deformity >30 o or severe biplanar deformity (retroversion >20 o and inclination > 10 o).
- Workers' compensation case
- Presence of full-thickness rotator cuff tear
- Known allergic reactions to components of the study product(s)
- History of consistent narcotic use within three months of surgery
- History of chronic oral corticosteroid use
- History or current drug or alcohol abuse
- In the surgeon's opinion, the subject will be non-compliant with the study protocol.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Hemiarthroplasty with pyrocarbon
|
Hemiarthroplasty with pyrocarbon
|
|
Active Comparator: Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty
|
Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score
Time Frame: 2-years
|
Assess shoulder pain and function.
The score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a better shoulder function and less pain.
|
2-years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
American Shoulder and Elbow Visual Analog Pain Score
Time Frame: 2-weeks, 3-months, 6-months, 1-year, 2-years, 5-years, 10-years
|
Assess pain relief.
Range: 0-10.
Zero is equivalent to no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain
|
2-weeks, 3-months, 6-months, 1-year, 2-years, 5-years, 10-years
|
|
Forgotten Joint score
Time Frame: 2-weeks, 3-months, 6-months, 1-year, 2-years, 5-years, 10-years
|
Assess shoulder function.
The total score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high degree of forgetting the artificial joint.
|
2-weeks, 3-months, 6-months, 1-year, 2-years, 5-years, 10-years
|
|
Range of motion
Time Frame: 2-weeks, 3-months, 6-months, 1-year, 2-years, 5-years, 10-years
|
Assess shoulder motion.
Subjects will have their shoulder range of motion measured in degrees.
|
2-weeks, 3-months, 6-months, 1-year, 2-years, 5-years, 10-years
|
|
Assess rates of glenoid erosion
Time Frame: 2-years, 5-years, 10-years
|
Assess rates of glenoid erosion associated with pyrocarbon hemiarthroplasty
|
2-years, 5-years, 10-years
|
|
Assess rates of aseptic glenoid loosening
Time Frame: 2-years, 5-years, 10-years
|
Assess rates of aseptic glenoid loosening associated with anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty
|
2-years, 5-years, 10-years
|
|
Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation Score
Time Frame: 5-years, 10-years
|
Assess shoulder pain and function.
The score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a better shoulder function and less pain.
|
5-years, 10-years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Benjamin Zmistowski, MD, Washington University School of Medicine
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 202501233
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.