A Single-arm Clinical Study Evaluating Pirfenidone and Sintilimab in Combination With Standard Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer Patients With Peritoneal Metastasis.

November 25, 2025 updated by: Guoxiang Cai

A Single-arm Clinical Trial of Pirfenidone Plus Sintilimab Combined With Standard Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients With Colorectal Cancer Peritoneal Metastasis

Assuming that the objective response rate (ORR) of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer peritoneal metastasis is approximately 0.40 , a total sample size of 30 patients is required.

Step 1:

Ten patients will be initially enrolled. If the number of responders (CR/PR) is < 2, the study will be terminated early for futility.

If the number of responders is > 8, the treatment regimen will be considered effective, and the study may be concluded early.

Step 2:

If the number of responders in Step 1 is between 2 and 8, the study will continue to enroll an additional 20 patients until completion.

Treatment regimen: CapeOX + Pirfenidone + Sintilimab

CapeOX:

Oxaliplatin (L-OHP) 130 mg/m², IV infusion over 2 hours on Day 1 Capecitabine 1,000 mg/m² orally, twice daily for 14 consecutive days Repeated every 3 weeks

Pirfenidone:

Oral administration, 200 mg three times daily, taken on an empty stomach (low-dose regimen)

Sintilimab:

200 mg per dose, IV infusion once every 3 weeks The first 4 cycles are provided free of charge. After the fourth cycle, tumor response will be assessed; if continued use is required, a "buy 2, get 2 free" policy will apply.

Tumor response evaluation will be performed after 4 treatment cycles.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age between 18 and 75 years;
  2. Radiologically (CT/MRI/PET-CT/FAPI-PET) or pathologically confirmed peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer;
  3. Planned to receive first-line chemotherapy;
  4. ECOG performance status of 0-1;

  5. Adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function:

    1. Neutrophil count ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L
    2. Platelet count ≥ 100 × 10⁹/L
    3. Hemoglobin ≥ 8.0 g/dL
    4. Creatinine clearance > 30 mL/min
    5. For patients without liver metastasis: AST and ALT ≤ 2.5 × upper limit of normal (ULN)
    6. Total bilirubin ≤ 2 × ULN
    7. APTT and PT ≤ 1.5 × ULN

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Individuals with a tendency to bleed, hereditary bleeding disorders, or evidence of coagulation abnormalities;
  2. Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or women of childbearing potential who are not using effective contraception;
  3. Expected survival ≤ 3 months;
  4. Participation in another investigational drug trial within the past 4 weeks;
  5. Prior treatment with any anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, anti-PD-L2, or anti-CTLA-4 antibodies (or any other antibodies targeting T-cell co-stimulation or immune checkpoint pathways);
  6. Uncontrolled neurological or psychiatric disorders that may affect compliance or the ability to report treatment responses;
  7. Known allergy to any study drug.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: pirfenidone plus sintilimab combined with standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Drug: pirfenidone plus sintilimab combined with standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Treatment regimen: CapeOX + Pirfenidone + Sintilimab

CapeOX:

Oxaliplatin (L-OHP) 130 mg/m², IV infusion over 2 hours on Day 1 Capecitabine 1,000 mg/m² orally, twice daily for 14 consecutive days Repeated every 3 weeks

Pirfenidone:

Oral administration, 200 mg three times daily, taken on an empty stomach (low-dose regimen)

Sintilimab:

200 mg per dose, IV infusion once every 3 weeks The first 4 cycles are provided free of charge. After the fourth cycle, tumor response will be assessed; if continued use is required, a "buy 2, get 2 free" policy will apply.

Tumor response evaluation will be performed after 4 treatment cycles.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ORR
Time Frame: 3months
Objective Response Rate (ORR) is defined as the proportion of patients who achieve a best overall response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) during neoadjuvant therapy, as assessed by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1 criteria.
3months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival
Time Frame: 2years
2years
Safety
Time Frame: 6months
The severity of adverse events was determined using the NCI-CTC AE 5.0 standard. During the trial, the adverse event record form should be filled in truthfully, including the time of occurrence, severity, relevance to the study treatment, duration, measures taken, and outcome of the adverse event.
6months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Guoxiang Cai

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 25, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 25, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 8, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 8, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 25, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • FDCRC0724

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings