Increasing Lung Cancer Screening Uptake Among Emergency Department Patients

April 27, 2026 updated by: University of Rochester

The objective of the proposed clinical trial is to determine if we can increase LCS among ED patients using a combination of facilitated referral to an LCS program plus text message reminders to get screened. Step 1 of the approach is to identify participants that are eligible for LCS. Step 2 is to randomize eligible study participants between two study arms: (1) basic referral for LCS (i.e.

verbal referral with written materials), and (2) facilitated referral for LCS (i.e. submission of a requisition to LCS program by staff) plus a subsequent series of text messages aimed at generating intention and motivation to get screened. The investigators' preliminary work showed this approach was feasible in the ED setting. The proposed study will build on this preliminary work with the goal of having a significant positive impact on LCS uptake.

A total of 300 individuals eligible for LCS will be recruited from a high-volume urban ED, randomized between study arms, and followed-up at 120 days to assess interval LCS uptake. The Specific Aims of the proposed project are, (1) Compare LCS uptake between the two study arms, (2) Identify predictors of individuals that are not up-to-date with LCS at the time of enrollment, and (3) Evaluate study participant feedback on (a) barriers and facilitators to getting screened and (b) acceptability and appropriateness of ED-based promotion of LCS. The study team is at the forefront of developing ED-based interventions to promote cancer screening. This project leverages the universal access setting of the ED to identify individuals at greatest risk for lung cancer and get them screened. A scalable ED-based intervention that increases LCS uptake would save lives.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
349

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14642
        • Recruiting
        • University of Rochester
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Nancy Wood
        • Principal Investigator:
          • David Adler
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Beau Abar

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 50 - 80
  • ≥ 20 pack-year smoking history
  • current smoker or quit within 15 years
  • English speaking
  • Current patient in URMC involved Emergency Department

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-English
  • Inability to provide consent (e.g. high clinical acuity, cognitive deficit)
  • Lack of text-capable mobile phone and/or inability to use text function
  • Not being a patient in URMC involved Emergency Department There are no restrictions for gender, racial and ethnic origins.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Basic Referral (enhanced control arm)
Participants assigned to Arm 1 will be referred to the UR Medicine LCS Program and their primary care provider (if they have one) to discuss LCS. They will also be provided with written materials that include telephone contact information for the LCS Program Navigator.
Behavioral: Basic Referral (enhanced control arm)
They will also be provided with written materials that include telephone contact information for the LCS Program Navigator. If contacted, the LCS Program Navigator will conduct a shared decision-making (SDM) discussion, schedule the screening CT scan at one of the 8 regional American College of Radiology-designated LCS centers and arrange follow-up as needed. Since determination of LCS needs is not routine during an ED visit, this "control arm" reflects an enhancement over usual care. It would not be ethical to identify a patient with screening needs without providing a referral.
Experimental: Facilitated Referral + Text Messaging
For participants assigned to Arm 2, an LCS requisition form will be submitted to the UR Medicine LCS Program on behalf of the participant during their ED visit. The participant's primary care provider (if they have one) will be CC'd on the requisition. Participants will be instructed that the LCS program will reach out to them to discuss LCS and, if decided upon, schedule screening. An LCS Program Navigator will call the participant by phone, conduct a shared decision-making discussion, and schedule the screening CT scan (assuming eligibility is confirmed and the discussion results in the participant's decision to schedule screening). In addition, participants in Arm 2 will receive a series of text messages, grounded in the TPB, SDT, and HBM aimed at generating intention and motivation to get LCS.
Behavioral: Facilitated referral and text messaging
Participants randomized to the experimental arm will be instructed that the LCS program will reach out to them to discuss LCS and, if decided upon, schedule screening. An LCS Program Navigator will call the participant by phone, conduct a shared decision-making discussion, and schedule the screening CT scan (assuming eligibility is confirmed and the discussion results in the participant's decision to schedule screening). In addition, participants in Arm 2 will receive a series of text messages, grounded in the TPB, SDT, and HBM aimed at generating intention and motivation to get LCS.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment for LCS Uptake and Downstream Care
Time Frame: From enrollment through participation with first assessment at ~ 120 days of participation.
The primary outcome, LCS uptake, will be assessed via telephone follow-up and EHR review.
From enrollment through participation with first assessment at ~ 120 days of participation.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Rochester

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 18, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 2, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 2, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 17, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 27, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • FP 9214

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings