Implementation Strategies for Caregiver and Teacher Use of Behavioral Interventions: Aim 2

February 4, 2026 updated by: Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
The purpose of this study is to pilot test for feasibility and initial promise an implementation strategy resource package that aims to support caregivers in using behavioral interventions for children with hyperactive, inattentive, or impulsive behaviors, when provided as an adjunct to a resource package for teachers. Participating children will be randomized at the classroom level to one of two conditions: a) their teacher and caregiver receive the resource package, or b) only their teacher receive the resource package. The research team will examine teacher and caregiver implementation outcomes and mental health outcomes for enrolled children.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Enrolling by invitation

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Evidence-based interventions for children with or at-risk for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) include antecedent- and consequence- based behavioral interventions in both the classroom and home settings as well as effective home-school communication approaches. Schools are a promising setting in which to provide early intervention for mental health challenges and to increase access to mental health care. Furthermore, stronger integration between home- and school- based interventions has the potential to meaningfully improve child outcomes. However, there are substantial implementation challenges to caregivers' use of these evidence-based interventions. The purpose of this study is to pilot test for feasibility and initial promise an implementation strategy resource package that aims to support caregivers in using behavioral interventions for children with hyperactive, inattentive, or impulsive behaviors, when provided as an adjunct to a resource package for teachers. Participating children will be randomized at the classroom level to one of two conditions: a) both teacher and caregiver receive the resource package, or b) only the teacher receive the resource package. The research team will examine teacher and caregiver implementation outcomes and mental health outcomes for enrolled children.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Gwendolyn Lawson, PhD
  • Phone Number: (267) 426-6612
  • Email: lawsong@chop.edu

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19146
        • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Teacher Inclusion criteria

  • A K-5 teacher at a participating school
  • Informed consent

Child Inclusion Criteria

  • Is in a K-5 (ages 4-13 years) class of a participating teacher
  • Nominated for participation by the participating teacher
  • Identified by their participating teacher as displaying functional impairment from ADHD symptoms, as measured by a score of a 3 or greater on the modified version of the Impairment Rating Scale.
  • Informed consent and assent if appropriate

Child Exclusion Criteria

  • Special education classification of 'intellectual disability'
  • Presents as in acute risk of harm to self or others, such that participation in the study is clinically inappropriate because the child warrants more intensive intervention
  • Students from families in which there is not a caregiver who speaks English will be excluded because the focus of this study is developing an English-language version of the resource package

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Intervention Group
Teachers in this group will receive an implementation support package and receive support in using it within their classroom management practice. Also within the intervention group (experimental), will be up to 2 students nested in the classroom and their caregivers. Caregivers in this group will receive an implementation support package and receive support in using it.
Behavioral: Positive Behavior Management Toolkit for Caregivers
The Positive Behavior Management Toolkit for Caregivers, or the implementation strategy resource package for caregivers, is a set of resources provided that aims to support their use of evidence-based behavior management practices and home-school communication strategies.
Other Names:
  • Implementation Strategy Resource Package for Caregivers
  • Supporting School Success - Caregiver Version (SSS-C)
Behavioral: Positive Behavioral Management Toolkit for Teachers
The Positive Behavior Management Toolkit for Teachers, or the implementation strategy resource package for teachers, is a set of resources provided that aims to support their use of evidence-based behavior management practices and home-school communication strategies.
Other Names:
  • Implementation Strategy Resource Package for Teachers
  • Supporting School Success - Teacher Version (SSS-T)
Active Comparator: Control Group
Teachers in this group will receive an implementation support package and receive support in using it within their classroom management practice. Also within the control group (active comparator) will be up to 2 students nested in the classroom and their caregivers. Caregivers in this group will not receive the implementation resource package.
Behavioral: Positive Behavioral Management Toolkit for Teachers
The Positive Behavior Management Toolkit for Teachers, or the implementation strategy resource package for teachers, is a set of resources provided that aims to support their use of evidence-based behavior management practices and home-school communication strategies.
Other Names:
  • Implementation Strategy Resource Package for Teachers
  • Supporting School Success - Teacher Version (SSS-T)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of Intervention Measure - Caregiver Report
Time Frame: Endpoint (i.e., at least 8 weeks from resource package receipt)
Caregiver-reported total score on the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM), which consists of 4 items on a 5-point Likert scale (from 1 = Completely Disagree to 5 = Completely Agree). The total score is the average of the 4 item scores (possible range: 1 through 5, where 5 is the best possible outcome).
Endpoint (i.e., at least 8 weeks from resource package receipt)
Feasibility of Intervention Measure - Teacher Report
Time Frame: Endpoint (i.e., at least 8 weeks from resource package receipt)
Teacher-reported total score on the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM), which consists of 4 items on a 5-point Likert scale (from 1 = Completely Disagree to 5 = Completely Agree). The total score is the average of the 4 item scores (possible range: 1 through 5, where 5 is the best possible outcome).
Endpoint (i.e., at least 8 weeks from resource package receipt)
Acceptability of Intervention Measure - Caregiver Report
Time Frame: Endpoint (i.e., at least 8 weeks from resource package receipt)
Caregiver-reported total score on the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), which consists of 4 items on a 5-point Likert scale (from 1 = Completely Disagree to 5 = Completely Agree). The total score is the average of the 4 item scores (possible range: 1 through 5, where 5 is the best possible outcome).
Endpoint (i.e., at least 8 weeks from resource package receipt)
Acceptability of Intervention Measure - Teacher Report
Time Frame: Endpoint (i.e., at least 8 weeks from resource package receipt)
Teacher-reported total score on the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), which consists of 4 items on a 5-point Likert scale (from 1 = Completely Disagree to 5 = Completely Agree). The total score is the average of the 4 item scores (possible range: 1 through 5, where 5 is the best possible outcome).
Endpoint (i.e., at least 8 weeks from resource package receipt)
Intervention Appropriateness Measure - Caregiver Report
Time Frame: Endpoint (i.e., at least 8 weeks from resource package receipt)
Caregiver-reported total score on the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), which consists of 4 items on a 5-point Likert scale (from 1 = Completely Disagree to 5 = Completely Agree). The total score is the average of the 4 item scores (possible range: 1 through 5, where 5 is the best possible outcome).
Endpoint (i.e., at least 8 weeks from resource package receipt)
Intervention Appropriateness Measure - Teacher Report
Time Frame: Endpoint (i.e., at least 8 weeks from resource package receipt)
Teacher-reported total score on the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), which consists of 4 items on a 5-point Likert scale (from 1 = Completely Disagree to 5 = Completely Agree). The total score is the average of the 4 item scores (possible range: 1 through 5, where 5 is the best possible outcome).
Endpoint (i.e., at least 8 weeks from resource package receipt)
Change in teacher-report child performance
Time Frame: Baseline, endpoint (i.e., at least 8 weeks from resource package receipt)
Teacher-reported performance items on the National Institute for Children's Health Quality Vanderbilt Scale - Teacher Version; These 8 items are rated on a 5-point scale (from 1 = Excellent to 5 = Problematic). The total score is the average of the 8 item scores (possible range 1 through 5, where 1 is the best possible outcome).
Baseline, endpoint (i.e., at least 8 weeks from resource package receipt)
Change in caregiver-report child performance
Time Frame: Baseline, endpoint (i.e., at least 8 weeks from resource package receipt)
Caregiver-reported performance items on the National Institute for Children's Health Quality Vanderbilt Scale - Parent Version; These 7 items are rated on a 5-point scale (from 1 = Excellent to 5 = Problematic). The total score is the average of the 7 item scores (possible range 1 through 5, where 1 is the best possible outcome).
Baseline, endpoint (i.e., at least 8 weeks from resource package receipt)
Change in teacher-reported parent-teacher relationship
Time Frame: Baseline, endpoint (i.e., at least 8 weeks from resource package receipt)
Teacher-reported items on a 5-item subscale from the Parent-Teacher Involvement Questionnaire. These 5 items are rated on a 5-point scale (from 0 to 4). The total score is the average of the 5 item scores (possible range 0 to 4, where 4 is the best possible outcome).
Baseline, endpoint (i.e., at least 8 weeks from resource package receipt)
Change in caregiver-reported parent-teacher relationship
Time Frame: Baseline, endpoint (i.e., at least 8 weeks from resource package receipt)
Caregiver-reported items on a 6-item subscale from the Parent-Teacher Involvement Questionnaire. These 6 items are rated on a 5-point scale (from 0 = "not at all" to 4 = "a great dael"). The total score is the average of the 6 item scores (possible range 0 to 4, where 4 is the best possible outcome).
Baseline, endpoint (i.e., at least 8 weeks from resource package receipt)
Change in academic productivity
Time Frame: Baseline, endpoint (i.e., at least 8 weeks from resource package receipt)
Teacher-reported Academic Productivity subscale score of the Academic Performance Rating Scale (APRS). The Academic Productivity subscale includes 12 items, each rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 to 5. Four items are reverse scored, and the total score is computed as the average of the 12 items (possible range: 1 through 5, where 5 is the best possible outcome).
Baseline, endpoint (i.e., at least 8 weeks from resource package receipt)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Caregiver-reported ADHD symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline, endpoint (i.e., at least 8 weeks from resource package receipt)
Caregiver-reported inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity symptoms scores on the National Institute for Children's Health Quality Vanderbilt Scale - Parent Version, which consists of 18 items, rated on 4-point scales (from 0 = Never to 3 = Very Often). The total score is calculated as the average of the of the 18 item scores (possible range 0 through 3, where 0 is the best possible outcome).
Baseline, endpoint (i.e., at least 8 weeks from resource package receipt)
Change in Teacher-reported ADHD symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline, endpoint (i.e., at least 8 weeks from resource package receipt)
Teacher-reported inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity symptoms scores on the National Institute for Children's Health Quality Vanderbilt Scale - Teacher Version, which consists of 18 items, rated on 4-point scales (from 0 = Never to 3 = Very Often). The total score is calculated as the average of the of the 18 item scores (possible range 0 through 3, where 0 is the best possible outcome).
Baseline, endpoint (i.e., at least 8 weeks from resource package receipt)
Change in Student-Teacher Relationship
Time Frame: Baseline, endpoint (i.e., at least 8 weeks from resource package receipt)
Teacher-reported total score on the Student-Teacher Relationship Scale - Short form, which consists of 15 items, rated on a 5-point scale (from 1 = Definitely does not apply to 5 = Definitely applies). Eight items are reverse scored and then the total score is computed as the average of the 15 item scores (possible range: 1 through 5, where 5 is the best possible outcome).
Baseline, endpoint (i.e., at least 8 weeks from resource package receipt)
Change in academic success
Time Frame: Baseline, endpoint (i.e., at least 8 weeks from resource package receipt)
Teacher-reported Academic Success subscale score of the Academic Performance rating Scale (APRS). The Academic Success subscale includes 7 items, each rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 to 5. One item is reverse scored, and the total score is computed as the average of the 7 items (possible range: 1 through 5, where 5 is the best possible outcome).
Baseline, endpoint (i.e., at least 8 weeks from resource package receipt)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 3, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 22, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 22, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 7, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 4, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 25-023858

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings