The Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Venlafaxine for Prevention of Postherpetic Neuralgia in Patients With Acute Herpes Zoster

August 31, 2026 updated by: Fang Luo, Beijing Tiantan Hospital

The Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Oral Medications (Venlafaxine) for Prevention of Postherpetic Neuralgia in Acute Herpes Zoster

Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is the most common complication of herpes zoster (HZ) and represents a major clinical challenge due to its chronicity and impact on quality of life. Current treatments for acute HZ pain have limited efficacy in preventing PHN, highlighting the need for effective preventive strategies targeting early pathophysiological mechanisms. Venlafaxine as a plausible and clinically relevant candidate for early intervention to prevent the transition from acute HZ pain to PHN.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
832

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
      • Beijing, China
        • Recruiting
        • Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, Beijing 100070
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Ages more than 18 years;
  • 2. Patients with onset of HZ rash less than 30 days;
  • 3. Experiencing moderate to severe HZ pain with an average pain score of at least 4 on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0 = no pain, 10 = worst possible pain);
  • 4. Aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels less than twice the upper limit of normal;
  • 5. Estimated glomerular filtration rate of 30 mL/min per 1.73 m2 or higher;
  • 6. Willing to sign the informed consent form and possessing sufficient cognitive and language abilities to comply with all the study requirements.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. HZ with head, neck, ocular, mucous membrane, cranial nerve, or central nervous system involvement or generalized HZ;
  • 2.Known hypersensitivity to venlafaxine;
  • 3. Previous antiviral treatment that did not comply with guideline recommendations;
  • 4. History of herpes zoster vaccination before enrollment;
  • 5.History of major depressive disorder requiring antidepressant therapy;
  • 6.History of systemic immune diseases, organ transplantation, or cancers;
  • 7.Pregnancy or lactation;
  • 8.Presence of acute or chronic pain disorders other than HZ.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Conventional therapy group
Drug: Conventional therapy
The control group will receive conventional therapy alone before 90 days after rash onset. After 90 days from rash onset, treatment will be standardized across both groups. Participants who develop persistent pain consistent with PHN will receive guideline-based management, including gabapentinoids, tricyclic antidepressants, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, and topical agents such as lidocaine or capsaicin, as clinically indicated.
Experimental: Venlafaxine combined with conventional therapy group
Drug: Venlafaxine combined conventional therapy
Venlafaxine will be initiated at 75 mg once daily and titrated based on pain response and tolerability before 90 days after rash onset. All participants will receive standardized analgesic management following the World Health Organization pain ladder. In addition, the group will contain conventional treatment for HZ, including NSAIDs, opioids, antiviral drugs and so on. After 90 days from rash onset, treatment will be standardized across both groups. Participants who develop persistent pain consistent with PHN will receive guideline-based management, including gabapentinoids, tricyclic antidepressants, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, and topical agents such as lidocaine or capsaicin, as clinically indicated.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of PHN
Time Frame: at 90 days after rash onset
PHN will be defined as persistent pain in the affected dermatome at 90 days after rash onset that is clinically meaningful, operationalized as an average pain score ≥ 3 on the NRS.
at 90 days after rash onset

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neuropathic Pain Scale
Time Frame: at or after 90 days following rash onset
Neuropathic pain characteristics will be assessed using the Neuropathic Pain Scale in participants with developing PHN. The Neuropathic Pain Scale consists of 10 numeric rating items, each scored from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater neuropathic pain severity. The scale assesses pain intensity, unpleasantness, and 8 specific pain qualities, including sharp, hot, dull, cold, sensitive, itchy, deep, and surface pain.
at or after 90 days following rash onset
The average daily pain intensity
Time Frame: at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 52
The numeric rating scale (NRS) score is a way to quantify the degree of subjective feelings such as pain using numbers. Generally, 0 represents no pain, and 10 represents the most severe pain. A higher score indicates more severe pain.
at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 52
The worst numeric rating scale score
Time Frame: at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 52
The numeric rating scale (NRS) score is a way to quantify the degree of subjective feelings such as pain using numbers. Generally, 0 represents no pain, and 10 represents the most severe pain. A higher score indicates more severe pain.
at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 52
Proportion of Patients Achieving Pain Reduction
Time Frame: at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 52
The proportion of patients achieving a ≥ 50% and ≥ 30% reduction in mean baseline pain intensity
at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 52
Average weekly consumption of each analgesic class
Time Frame: at weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, and 52
at weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, and 52
Herpes Zoster Severity of Illness Index
Time Frame: at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12
The HZSOI is a severity-by-duration measure of overall pain burden associated with HZ and is typically calculated as the area under the curve of the worst pain scores over a defined period after rash onset.
at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12
The 12-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) score
Time Frame: at weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, and 52
The SF-12 score assesses the health-related quality of life, capturing preferences across various health states. It assesses 8 dimensions: physical functioning, physical role limitations due to physical health, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, emotional role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Scores range from 0 to 100 for each dimension, with higher scores indicating better health status.
at weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, and 52
The Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS)
Time Frame: at weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, and 52
The MOS is a questionnaire comprising 12 items that assess various aspects of sleep using a 6-point ordinal scale (1 indicating permanence and 6 indicating absence).
at weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, and 52
Adverse events
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 52 weeks
The incidence and proportion of adverse events will be recorded and categorized as mild, moderate, severe, or life-threatening. AEs are defined as events that arise during treatment, were absent before treatment, or worsen relative to the pretreatment state.
Through study completion, an average of 52 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
Zhongnan Hospital
Jilin Provincial People's Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 15, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 13, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 21, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 23, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 31, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • KY2025-369-02-3

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after de-identification (text, tables, figures and appendices) are available. Derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author Fang Luo on request.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings