Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: the HOOD Technique Versus Standard Anterior Reconstruction
Early Functional Outcomes After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective Comparison of the HOOD Technique Versus Standard Anterior Reconstruction
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
- Ankara Universtity School of medicine department of urology
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- life expectancy >10 years,
- clinically organ confined disease (cT1-cT2),
- biopsy ISUP GG ≤3,
- total serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤10 ng/ml
- normal preoperative continence and potency
Exclusion Criteria:
- high risk prosatate cancer
- cN1
- M1 prostate cancer (according to preoperative GA68 PSMA PET CT)
- pre-existing urinary incontinence,
- previous prostatic, urethral, bladder neck surgery
- neoadjuvant therapy
- prior pelvic radiotherapy
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: HOOD technique
|
Prostatectomy with the HOOD (Hood technique) is a nerve-sparing approach in which the anterior periprostatic structures, including the detrusor apron and puboprostatic ligaments, are preserved to maintain anterior urethral support and neurovascular integrity, with the aim of improving early urinary continence and functional recovery after radical prostatectomy.
|
|
Active Comparator: Anterior-Posterior reconstruction
|
Prostatectomy with anterior-posterior reconstruction involves restoration of both the posterior musculofascial plate and the anterior periurethral support structures during vesicourethral anastomosis, aiming to re-establish normal pelvic anatomy and improve early postoperative urinary continence following radical prostatectomy.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Functional outcomes
Time Frame: 3 weeks , 6 weeks and 12 weeks after surgery.
|
The Urinary continance recovery rates at the catheter removal, and subsequently at 3 weeks , 6 weeks and 12 weeks after surgery.
|
3 weeks , 6 weeks and 12 weeks after surgery.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Heesakkers J, Farag F, Bauer RM, Sandhu J, De Ridder D, Stenzl A. Pathophysiology and Contributing Factors in Postprostatectomy Incontinence: A Review. Eur Urol. 2017 Jun;71(6):936-944. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.09.031. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
- Mandel A, Choudhary M, Tillu N, Maheshwari A, Kolanukuduru K, Wagaskar V, Tewari A. Hood Technique for Radical Prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2025 Mar;39(S1):S35-S38. doi: 10.1089/end.2024.0303.
- Turkolmez K, Akpinar C, Kubilay E, Suer E. Retzius-Sparing vs Modified Anatomical Structure Preserving and Retzius-Repairing Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective Randomized Comparison on Functional Outcomes with a 1-Year Follow-Up. J Endourol. 2022 Sep;36(9):1214-1222. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0073. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
- Tewari AK, Bigelow K, Rao S, Takenaka A, El-Tabi N, Te A, Vaughan ED. Anatomic restoration technique of continence mechanism and preservation of puboprostatic collar: a novel modification to achieve early urinary continence in men undergoing robotic prostatectomy. Urology. 2007 Apr;69(4):726-31. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.12.028.
- Student V Jr, Vidlar A, Grepl M, Hartmann I, Buresova E, Student V. Advanced Reconstruction of Vesicourethral Support (ARVUS) during Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: One-year Functional Outcomes in a Two-group Randomised Controlled Trial. Eur Urol. 2017 May;71(5):822-830. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.032. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
- Porpiglia F, Bertolo R, Manfredi M, De Luca S, Checcucci E, Morra I, Passera R, Fiori C. Total Anatomical Reconstruction During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Implications on Early Recovery of Urinary Continence. Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):485-95. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.005. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
- Mather JS. Impossible direct laryngoscopy in achondroplasia. A case report. Anaesthesia. 1966 Apr;21(2):244-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1966.tb02607.x. No abstract available.
- Cambio AJ, Evans CP. Minimising postoperative incontinence following radical prostatectomy: considerations and evidence. Eur Urol. 2006 Nov;50(5):903-13; discussion 913. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.08.009. Epub 2006 Aug 28.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Urogenital Diseases
- Genital Diseases
- Genital Neoplasms, Male
- Urogenital Neoplasms
- Neoplasms by Site
- Neoplasms
- Genital Diseases, Male
- Prostatic Diseases
- Male Urogenital Diseases
- Neoplasms by Histologic Type
- Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial
- Carcinoma
- Prostatic Neoplasms
- Adenocarcinoma
- Surgical Procedures, Operative
- Urologic Surgical Procedures
- Urogenital Surgical Procedures
- Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male
- Prostatectomy
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- İ01-86-26
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.