Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: the HOOD Technique Versus Standard Anterior Reconstruction

February 11, 2026 updated by: Araz Musaev

Early Functional Outcomes After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective Comparison of the HOOD Technique Versus Standard Anterior Reconstruction

This prospective, non-randomized cohort study included consecutive patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) between January 2024 and January 2026 following ethics committee approval. Patients with clinically localized prostate cancer eligible for bilateral nerve-sparing surgery were enrolled. Two surgical techniques-anterior-posterior reconstruction (APR) and the HOOD technique-were compared. All procedures were performed by a single high-volume surgeon at a tertiary referral center. The primary endpoint was early urinary continence recovery, assessed at catheter removal and at 3, 6, and 12 weeks postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications, positive surgical margin rates, and early oncological outcomes.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
        • Ankara Universtity School of medicine department of urology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • life expectancy >10 years,
  • clinically organ confined disease (cT1-cT2),
  • biopsy ISUP GG ≤3,
  • total serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤10 ng/ml
  • normal preoperative continence and potency

Exclusion Criteria:

  • high risk prosatate cancer
  • cN1
  • M1 prostate cancer (according to preoperative GA68 PSMA PET CT)
  • pre-existing urinary incontinence,
  • previous prostatic, urethral, bladder neck surgery
  • neoadjuvant therapy
  • prior pelvic radiotherapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: HOOD technique
Prostatectomy with the HOOD (Hood technique) is a nerve-sparing approach in which the anterior periprostatic structures, including the detrusor apron and puboprostatic ligaments, are preserved to maintain anterior urethral support and neurovascular integrity, with the aim of improving early urinary continence and functional recovery after radical prostatectomy.
Active Comparator: Anterior-Posterior reconstruction
Prostatectomy with anterior-posterior reconstruction involves restoration of both the posterior musculofascial plate and the anterior periurethral support structures during vesicourethral anastomosis, aiming to re-establish normal pelvic anatomy and improve early postoperative urinary continence following radical prostatectomy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional outcomes
Time Frame: 3 weeks , 6 weeks and 12 weeks after surgery.
The Urinary continance recovery rates at the catheter removal, and subsequently at 3 weeks , 6 weeks and 12 weeks after surgery.
3 weeks , 6 weeks and 12 weeks after surgery.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 11, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 11, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 18, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 18, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 11, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer (Adenocarcinoma)

Clinical Trials on Prostatectomy with HOOD techinque

Subscribe