Comparison of Awake Tracheal Intubation Methods (ATI)
A Comparison of Three Difficult Intubation Techniques in Patients With Anticipated Difficult Intubation: A Prospective, Randomized, Parallel-group Clinical Trial
The aim of this study was to compare three different awake tracheal intubation technique
-fiberoptic bronchoscopy (ATI:FB), videolaryngoscopy (ATI:VL), and fiberoptic bronchoscopy via a supraglottic airway device (ATI:SAD)- in terms of success rates, intubation times, and complications. Additionally, the study aims to evaluate the reliability of the SAD-assisted ATI method and its potential to contribute to the literature.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Awake tracheal intubation (ATI) is a technique considered the gold standard for managing anticipated difficult airways. The success of ATI is based on two key physiological advantages: the preservation of spontaneous breathing and the maintenance of airway tone. Traditionally, ATI is performed using a flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope (ATI:FB). However, in recent years, ATI techniques performed using video laryngoscopy (ATI:VL) have also become widespread and have particularly stood out for their shorter intubation times.
Although randomized studies directly comparing ATI:FB and ATI:VL techniques are limited in the literature, an increasing number of studies are evaluating the comparative efficacy of these techniques. On the other hand, while supraglottic airway devices (SADs) are traditionally used as rescue ventilation devices, current guidelines indicate that they can also serve as a channel for awake intubation in conjunction with fiberoptic bronchoscopy . Various case series and small-scale observational studies exist on this topic. However, there are no prospective studies directly comparing SAD use during ATI with traditional methods such as ATI:FB and ATI:VL. This gap in the literature forms the primary rationale for our study.
The ATI:SAD method currently used in our clinic is a technique in which the Aintree catheter and fiberoptic bronchoscope are utilized via SAD. This method offers advantages such as the ability to continuously monitor spontaneous breathing and maintain uninterrupted oxygenation. In this context, our study aims not only to demonstrate the efficacy of the ATI:SAD method but also to contribute this method to the literature.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Mehmet Yılmaz, Assoc. Prof.
- Phone Number: +905052174432
- Email: drmyilmaz33@gmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Ayşe Z Turan Cıvraz, Assoc.Prof.
- Phone Number: 05054695850
- Email: ayse.zeynep@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
Kocaeli
-
İzmit, Kocaeli, Turkey (Türkiye), 41060
- Kocaeli City Hospital
-
Contact:
- Ayşe Turan Cıvraz, Assoc.Prof
- Phone Number: 05054695850
- Email: ayse.zeynep@gmail.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patients aged 18 and older
- Patients classified as ASA I-II according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification
- Patients scheduled for elective surgery
- Patients expected to require difficult mask ventilation, difficult laryngoscopy, or difficult tracheal intubation; patients expected to have short apnea periods (Planjuan goiter); patients at risk of aspiration; patients expected to require difficult rescue techniques; and patients with a reported history of difficult intubation
- Patients scheduled for intubation using the awake tracheal intubation (ATI) method
- Individuals who have agreed to participate in the study by signing an informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with a mouth opening <1.5 cm
- Patients requiring emergency intubation or emergency surgery (situations where there is insufficient time to administer ATI)
- Patients who cannot cooperate (mental incapacity, impaired consciousness, inability to communicate, etc.)
- Patients with known allergies to lidocaine or other local/topical anesthetic agents used
- Pregnancy
- Patients with a history of severe cardiac arrhythmia or hemodynamic instability (due to increased risk during intubation)
- Patients who have previously undergone tracheostomy or whose airway is technically obstructed due to anatomical deformity
- Patients who refuse to participate in the study or who do not provide informed consent
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy (ATI: FOB)
Intubation will be perform via fiberoptic bronchoscopy
|
awake tracheal intubation will be perform via FOB
|
|
Active Comparator: Videolaryngoscopy (ATI:VL)
Intubation will be perform via videolaryngoscopy
|
Awake tracheal intubation will be perform via videolaryngoscopy
|
|
Active Comparator: Aintree catheter loaded fiberoptic bronchoscopy via Supraglottic Airway Device (ATI:SAD)
Intubation will be perform via aintree catheter loaded fiberoptic bronchoscopy through supraglottic airway device
|
Awake tracheal Intubation will be perform via aintree catheter loaded FOB through supraglottic airway device
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Success rate of chosen awake intubation method
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 year
|
The primary endpoint of the study is the success rate of the selected awake intubation technique, with the intubation method to be chosen via randomization.
|
Through study completion, an average of 2 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- KŞH-MY-01
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Videolaryngoscopy
-
NCT06881589Recruiting
-
NCT06925009Recruiting
-
NCT02787629CompletedIntubation | Videolaryngoscopy
-
NCT05767099RecruitingDifficult Videolaryngoscopy
-
NCT03908775CompletedChildren | Intubation | Videolaryngoscopy
-
NCT06972394CompletedDifficult Airway | Videolaryngoscopy
-
NCT03571295CompletedComparison of Videolaryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy in Pediatric Airway Management (LearnaBlade)Airway Management | Videolaryngoscopy
-
NCT01090726CompletedIntubation | Infant | Videolaryngoscopy