- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01090726
Intubation With Storz Videolaryngoscope® Versus Airtraq® - in an Infant Population
December 10, 2010 updated by: Rigshospitalet, Denmark
The purpose of the pilot study is to compare new laryngoscopes for infants by assessing the equipment best suited to assist the intubation, with the best overview, shortest time to intubation and use these numbers to make a sample size calculation for the full protocol.
The investigators hypothesis is that the Storz videolaryngoscope® has a better success rate than infants (<2 years).
The patients will be optimally anaesthetized with neuromuscular blockade for the intubation.
All patient will be evaluated with af Macintosh blade laryngoscope, with an Airtraq® or a Storz videolaryngoscope®, and finally intubated with the other one of the later, which the patient was randomized to.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
10
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Copenhagen, Denmark, 2100
- Department of Anaesthesia, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
1 month to 2 years (Child)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Elective surgical patients ASA-class 1-2 below the age of 2 years, with indication for intubation.
- Informed consent from parent.
- The parents must have legal custody of the child.
- The parents must be able to read and understand Danish.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Expected difficult airway.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Storz videolaryngoscope
Macintosh overview followed by Airtraq overview followed by Storz videolaryngoscope overview and intubation.
|
Storz videolaryngoscope being used for the actual intubation
|
|
Active Comparator: Airtraq
Macintosh overview followed by Storz videolaryngoscope overview followed by Airtraq overview and intubation.
|
Airtraq being used for the actual intubation
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Success rate
Time Frame: 5 minutes
|
Succes is defined by intubation being executed in the first try.
|
5 minutes
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Cormack evaluation
Time Frame: 5 minutes
|
5 minutes
|
|
|
Time to intubation
Time Frame: 5 minutes
|
5 minutes
|
|
|
Number of intubation attempts
Time Frame: 5 Minutes
|
5 Minutes
|
|
|
Quality of laryngeal overview before intubation
Time Frame: 5 Minutes
|
Evaluated by Cormack score
|
5 Minutes
|
|
Prevalence of post intubation stridor
Time Frame: 12 hours
|
12 hours
|
|
|
Intubation conditions
Time Frame: 5 Minutes
|
5 Minutes
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
March 1, 2010
Primary Completion (Actual)
October 1, 2010
Study Completion (Actual)
October 1, 2010
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 18, 2010
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 19, 2010
First Posted (Estimate)
March 22, 2010
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
December 13, 2010
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 10, 2010
Last Verified
March 1, 2010
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1A-INF-STORZ-AIR
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Intubation
-
National Cheng-Kung University HospitalNot yet recruitingIntubation; Complication | Intubation Intraesophageal | Intubation Depth | Intubation, Nasogastric | Intubation Times
-
Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research HospitalRecruitingIntubation | Intubation, Endotracheal | Intubation Complications | Rapid Sequence Induction and Intubation | Delayed Sequence IntubationTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Spanish Network for Research in Infectious DiseasesCompletedIntubation | Intubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult or FailedSpain
-
University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandSociété Française d'Anesthésie-Réanimation (SFAR)CompletedEndotracheal Intubation | Intubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult or FailedFrance
-
Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)RecruitingIntubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult | Failed or Difficult Intubation, SequelaUnited States, Canada, Japan, New Zealand, Singapore, Australia, Austria, India, United Kingdom, Italy, Germany
-
Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial...CompletedIntubation, Nasotracheal IntubationTaiwan
-
Emory UniversityTerminatedAirway Morbidity | Intubation Complication | Anesthesia Intubation Complication | Tracheal Intubation Morbidity | Failed or Difficult Intubation, SequelaUnited States
-
Catharina Ziekenhuis EindhovenCompletedAnesthesia Intubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult | Failed or Difficult Intubation | Failed or Difficult Intubation, Initial EncounterNetherlands
-
NHS LothianMedtronicNot yet recruitingIntubation Complications | Intubation Skill | Intubation With Uncuffed Endotracheal TubeUnited Kingdom
-
Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsCompletedIntubation Complication | Intubation;Difficult | Failed or Difficult Intubation, SequelaUnited States, Canada, Singapore
Clinical Trials on Storz videolaryngoscope
-
Catharina Ziekenhuis EindhovenCompletedAnesthesia Intubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult | Failed or Difficult Intubation | Failed or Difficult Intubation, Initial EncounterNetherlands
-
St. Justine's HospitalCompletedIntubation, IntratrachealCanada
-
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfCompletedGeneral Anesthesia | Intubation; Difficult or Failed | VideolaryngoscopyGermany
-
Hospital General Universitario de ValenciaFIPSERecruitingDifficult Intubation | Anesthesia Intubation ComplicationSpain
-
Acibadem UniversityCompletedEducational Problems | Financial HardshipTurkey
-
Rigshospitalet, DenmarkCompletedPatients With One or More Predictors of Difficult AirwayDenmark
-
Kocaeli UniversityCompletedAssessment | Difficult Airway Intubation | PreoperativeTurkey
-
Catharina Ziekenhuis EindhovenWithdrawnIntubation Complication | Injury of EpiglottisNetherlands
-
Catharina Ziekenhuis EindhovenCompletedIntubation Complication | Abrasion of Soft PalateNetherlands
-
Ajou University School of MedicineCompletedIntubation Time | Intubation Difficulty ScaleKorea, Republic of