Research on the Molecular Mechanism of Cognitive Differences Between Williams Syndrome and Autism Spectrum Disorder (WS and ASD)

March 29, 2026 updated by: Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
Williams Syndrome (WS) is a rare neurodevelopmental disorder, usually caused by microdeletions of approximately 26 genes in the long arm (7q11.23) region of chromosome 7. Children with this syndrome often exhibit distinctive facial features, mild to moderate intellectual disability, impaired spatial cognition, pronounced social extraversion, and relatively reserved language-expression characteristics. Although individuals with WS often demonstrate strong social interest and prosocial behaviors, significant deficiencies in abstract thinking, executive function, and visuospatial ability are frequently observed. At present, treatment for WS mainly focuses on behavioral intervention and educational rehabilitation, and clear molecular or pharmacological treatment methods remain limited. Due to the "opposite but related" social-cognitive profile observed in comparison with autism spectrum disorder, in-depth exploration of neural and molecular mechanisms underlying these differences has substantial scientific significance for understanding the biological basis of social-cognitive impairment.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
75

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Shandong
      • Jinan, Shandong, China, 250012
        • Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Source of research participants: WS research participants, ASD research participants and normal children controls who visited the pediatric health rehabilitation clinic

Description

Participants for Williams Syndrome Study

Inclusion criteria must all be met:

  1. Age 3-12 years old.
  2. Clinically diagnosed and confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) test, with a typical microdeletion of approximately 1.55 Mb in the chromosome 7q11.23 region.
  3. Their legal guardians fully understand the study content and voluntarily sign the informed consent form, agreeing for the study participants to undergo blood sampling and genetic testing.

Participants for Autism Spectrum Disorder Study

Inclusion criteria must all be met:

  1. Age 3-12 years old.
  2. Clinically diagnosed according to the second edition of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS-2) criteria.
  3. Their legal guardians fully understand the study content and voluntarily sign the informed consent form, agreeing for the study participants to undergo blood sampling and genetic testing.

Participants for Healthy Children Study

Inclusion criteria must all be met:

  1. Age 3-12 years old, with gender as close as possible to the participants in the above two groups.
  2. No history of neurodevelopmental disorders, mental illnesses or major neurological diseases.
  3. Their legal guardians fully understand the study content and voluntarily sign the informed consent form, agreeing for the study participants to undergo blood sampling and genetic testing.

Common Exclusion Criteria for All Study Participants

Any of the following conditions must be met to be excluded from the study:

  1. Specific medical conditions:
  2. For the Williams Syndrome group: Known or suspected presence of other pathogenic gene mutations/syndromes other than the 7q11.23 microdeletion.
  3. For the Autism Spectrum Disorder group: Co-occurring other clearly diagnosed neurodevelopmental disorders (such as Rett syndrome, fragile X syndrome, etc.).
  4. Brain structural abnormalities: According to recent cranial MRI and interpretation by neuro-radiology experts, significant brain structural lesions are found (for the patient group, referring to lesions unrelated to Williams Syndrome or autism; for the healthy group, referring to any clinically significant abnormalities).
  5. Major systemic diseases: Presence of diseases with clinical significance as judged by the researchers, which may: affect the interpretation of study results, or endanger the safety of the study participants.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Williams Syndrome
After clinical diagnosis and confirmation through fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing, a typical microdeletion of approximately 1.55 Mb in the chromosome 7q11.23 region was identified.
Autism Spectrum disorder
It meets the clinical diagnostic criteria of the Second Edition of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Scale (ADOS-2).
healthy children
There is no history of neurodevelopmental disorders, mental illness or major neurological diseases

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The score of Motor Quotient in Peabody Developmental Motor Scales, Second Edition (PDMS-2)
Time Frame: Baseline
Motor development will be assessed using the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales, Second Edition (PDMS-2). The endpoint is the Motor Quotient (range: 50-150). Higher scores indicate better motor functioning (i.e., better outcome). Group differences will be evaluated across WS, ASD, and typically developing controls.
Baseline
The score of Developmental Quotient (DQ) in Gesell Developmental Schedules (GDS)
Time Frame: Baseline
Neurodevelopmental level will be assessed using the Gesell Developmental Schedules (Gesell Developmental Scale). The endpoint is the Developmental Quotient (DQ) (range: 0-130). Higher scores indicate better developmental functioning (i.e., better outcome). Group differences will be evaluated across WS, ASD, and typically developing controls.
Baseline
Fractional Anisotropy (FA)
Time Frame: baseline
White matter microstructural integrity will be quantified using DTI-derived fractional anisotropy (FA). FA values range from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating greater directional diffusion and typically better white matter integrity (i.e., better outcome). Group differences will be evaluated across WS, ASD, and typically developing controls. Unit of Measure : mm²/s (typically reported as ×10-³ mm²/s)
baseline
The score pf Social Responsiveness Scale, Second Edition (SRS-2)
Time Frame: baseline
Social communication will be assessed using the Social Responsiveness Scale, Second Edition (SRS-2). The primary endpoint is the SCI T-score (range: 0-100). Higher scores indicate worse social communication impairment (i.e., poorer outcome). Group differences will be compared across WS, ASD, and typically developing controls.
baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Axial Diffusivity (AD)
Time Frame: Baseline
White matter microstructural properties will be quantified using DTI-derived axial diffusivity (AD). AD will be summarized as the mean AD within prespecified white matter regions of interest (ROIs) (or whole-brain white matter skeleton, if applicable). Higher AD indicates greater diffusion along the principal axis; interpretation (better/worse) is direction-dependent and will be interpreted in the context of neurodevelopmental findings. Unit of Measure: mm²/s (typically reported as ×10-³ mm²/s)
Baseline
Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Mean Diffusivity (MD)
Time Frame: Baseline
DTI-derived mean diffusivity (MD) will be calculated and summarized as the mean MD within prespecified white matter ROIs (or whole-brain white matter skeleton, if applicable). Higher MD indicates greater overall water diffusion and is commonly interpreted as reduced microstructural integrity (worse outcome). Unit of Measure: mm²/s (typically reported as ×10-³ mm²/s)
Baseline
Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Radial Diffusivity (RD)
Time Frame: Baseline
DTI-derived radial diffusivity (RD) will be calculated and summarized as the mean RD within prespecified white matter ROIs (or whole-brain white matter skeleton, if applicable). Higher RD indicates greater diffusion perpendicular to the principal axis and is often interpreted as poorer myelination or reduced microstructural integrity (worse outcome).Unit of Measure: mm²/s (typically reported as ×10-³ mm²/s)
Baseline
Structural MRI (sMRI) Cortical Volume
Time Frame: Baseline
Cortical morphology will be quantified from T1-weighted structural MRI. Cortical volume will be computed using an automated cortical reconstruction pipeline (e.g., FreeSurfer) and summarized as mean cortical volume (mm³) within prespecified cortical ROIs (or total cortical gray matter volume, if applicable). Higher cortical volume indicates greater cortical tissue volume. Unit of Measure: mm³
Baseline
Structural MRI (sMRI) Cortical Thickness
Time Frame: Baseline
Cortical morphology will be quantified from T1-weighted structural MRI. Cortical thickness will be computed and summarized as mean cortical thickness (mm) within prespecified cortical ROIs (or mean global cortical thickness, if applicable). Higher thickness indicates greater cortical thickness;Unit of Measure: mm
Baseline
Structural MRI (sMRI) Subcortical Structure Volume
Time Frame: Baseline
Subcortical anatomy will be quantified from T1-weighted structural MRI. Subcortical structure volumes (e.g., amygdala, hippocampus, thalamus, caudate, putamen, pallidum) will be computed using an automated segmentation pipeline (e.g., FreeSurfer) and summarized as volume (mm³) for prespecified subcortical regions. Higher volume indicates greater structure volume; Unit of Measure: mm³
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 23, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 29, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 3, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 3, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 29, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • QL000007

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings