Effects of Sacral Release Technique and Lumbar Mobilization in Primary Dysmenorrhea.

May 4, 2026 updated by: Riphah International University

Comparative Effects of Sacral Release Technique and Lumbar Mobilization in Pain, Symptoms Severity and Quality of Life in Primary Dysmenorrhea.

The aim of this study is to determine the comparative effects of sacral release technique and lumbar mobilization in pain, symptoms severity and quality of life in primary dysmenorrhea.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This will be a randomized clinical trial, the study will be conducted at First Care Medical Complex, over 10 month duration, involving a 46 adolescent females aged 13-19 years diagnosed with primary dysmenorrhea selected through a non-probability convenience sampling technique. Participants will be randomly assigned to two intervention groups. Group A (n=23) will receive the Sacral Release Technique and Group B (n=23) will undergo Lumbar Mobilization. Interventions will provide for 6 weeks, 3 sessions per cycle for two consecutive menstrual cycles. Pain intensity will be measured by using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and menstrual symptom severity will be evaluated using a structured symptom rating tool, and quality of life will be measured using EuroQOL. Data will be analyzed using SPSS version 25, and with p-value of <0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
46

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Pakistan
    • Punjab Province
      • Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan, 6400
        • Recruiting
        • Ittefaq Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Tanzila Nasrullah, MSPT(WH)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Unmarried female
  • Diagnosed with primary dysmenorrhea through WaLIDD Score
  • Regular menstrual cycles (21-35 days)
  • Pain score of > 4 on the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) during menstruation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any pelvic inflammatory disease
  • Obesity
  • PCOS
  • Spinal deformity
  • Lumber radiculopathy
  • Heavy menstrual bleeding (menorrhagia)
  • Irregular menstrual cycles
  • Spine trauma and coccyx pain
  • History of pelvic or spinal surgery currently on hormonal therapy or other ongoing physiotherapy for dysmenorrhea

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: SACRAL RELEASE TECHNIQUE
The sacral release technique is a gentle, non-invasive method used to relieve tension in the sacral area, improve pelvic alignment, and enhance overall comfort, particularly during pregnancy
Other: SACRAL RELEASE TECHNIQUE
The therapist will maintain gentle, sustained holds for 3 to 5 minutes per repetition, with 2 to 3 repetitions per session. Each session lasted 15 to 20 minutes. 3 times per week over a period of two consecutive menstrual cycles, for six-weeks period
Active Comparator: LUMBAR MOBILIZATION
Lumbar mobilization is a manual therapy technique used to relieve pain, restore joint motion, and improve mobility in the lower spine.
Other: LUMBAR MOBILIZATION
Treatments will be administered three times per menstrual cycle over a six-weeks period

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Time Frame: 6th week
The Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is a unidimensional scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). The NPRS demonstrates excellent test-retest reliability, with Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) typically above 0.90, indicating stability of responses over time. Its internal consistency has been shown to be high, with Cronbach's alpha values ranging from 0.86 to 0.95, reflecting a strong degree of reliability. The tool also has validity as it correlates significantly with other pain-related outcome measures domains of quality-of-life instruments
6th week
Menstrual Symptom Questionnaire (MSQ)
Time Frame: 6th week
It is a validated instrument designed to assess the frequency and intensity of common menstrual-related symptoms, including pain, mood changes, fatigue, bloating, and general discomfort. It provides a comprehensive overview of both physical and emotional aspects of menstruation, making it suitable for evaluating the effectiveness of interventions in conditions like primary dysmenorrhea. The scale demonstrates acceptable internal consistency, with a reported Cronbach's alpha of 0.78, indicating reliable measurement across diverse symptom domain
6th week
EuroQol-5 Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D)
Time Frame: 6th week
The EuroQol-5 Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D) is assessing health-related quality of life in women with primary dysmenorrhea. The internal consistency of the EQ-5D in related populations have reported a Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.70 to 0.89, indicating acceptable to excellent reliability
6th week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Riphah International University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: sobia ghafoor, t-DPT, Riphah International University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • Gottschewsky, N., D. Kraft, and T.J.B.o.s.D. Kaufmann, Menarche, pubertal timing and the brain: female-specific patterns of brain maturation beyond age-related development. 2024. 15(1): p. 25.
  • Wu, X., et al., Age at Menarche, Menopause Status and Metabolic Syndrome and its Components: Findings from the Henan Rural Cohort Study. 2023. 131(09): p. 463-471.
  • Qureshi, M.A., et al., Coping Mechanisms of Menopausal Women and Its Impact on the Quality of Life at Mohan Pura, Rawalpindi. 2025. 15(3): p. 197-202
  • Rana, M.Y., et al., Factors influencing the age of menopause among Pakistani women. 2021. 11(3): p. 214-216.
  • Keshwani, N., et al., Update in Adolescent Medicine, in Update in Pediatrics. 2024, Springer. p. 3-57.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 4, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 4, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 8, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 4, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • REC/RCR & AHS/25/0505

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dysmenorrhea

Clinical Trials on SACRAL RELEASE TECHNIQUE

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings