Observational Study of OROSEDAL in Sore Throat and Minor Oral Lesions

May 27, 2026 updated by: Laboratoires Elerte

Relief of Sore Throat Pain or Minor Mouth Lesions, Including Minor Aphthous Ulcers, in Children and Adults Treated With OROSEDAL: An Observational Study

This prospective, multicenter, national, observational, non-interventional post-market clinical follow-up study will evaluate the performance and safety of OROSEDAL in children and adults with sore throat or minor oral lesions, including minor aphthous ulcers and histologically confirmed oral lichen planus. OROSEDAL is prescribed in routine practice before inclusion. Patients will be followed for 6 ± 1 days and will complete self-assessments of pain, swallowing discomfort, treatment use, and adverse events.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

OROSEDAL is a CE-marked medical device intended to relieve sore throat, aphthous ulcers, oral lichen planus, and minor mouth lesions through a mechanical barrier and hydrating effect. The study is conducted in French general practice under real-life conditions of use. The decision to prescribe OROSEDAL is made independently from study participation. Eligible patients aged 8 years or older with sore throat or minor oral lesions evolving for less than 15 days and baseline global pain intensity >40 mm on a 0-100 mm visual analog scale will be enrolled. Data will be collected at inclusion, through a daily self-assessment diary, and at Day 6 ± 1 day or early termination. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with a reduction >20 mm in global pain intensity over the previous 24 hours between Day 0 and Day 1 evening. Secondary endpoints assess pain response at Day 6, immediate pain relief after first use, daily pain evolution, swallowing discomfort, global patient-rated effectiveness, associated symptoms, safety/tolerability, device deficiencies, and compliance.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
124

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Multiple Locations, France
        • Recruiting
        • Multiples facilities
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Children and adults aged 8 years or older consulting French general practitioners for sore throat or minor oral lesions, including minor aphthous ulcers or histologically confirmed oral lichen planus, for whom OROSEDAL has been prescribed in routine care.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 8 years or older, including adults.
  • Sore throat or minor mouth lesion, including minor aphthous ulcer or histologically confirmed oral lichen planus, evolving for less than 15 days.
  • Global pain intensity over the previous 24 hours, spontaneous and/or during chewing or swallowing, >40 mm on a 0-100 mm visual analog scale.
  • OROSEDAL prescription decided by the investigator before inclusion.
  • Written informed consent from the patient or from one parent for minors.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • More than 3 visible oral mucosal lesions.
  • Post-intubation sore throat.
  • Corticosteroid use ongoing or within 3 days before inclusion.
  • NSAID use ongoing or within 3 days before inclusion.
  • Local treatment on the lesion ongoing or within 3 days before inclusion.
  • Non-opioid analgesics, including paracetamol, ongoing or within 3 days before inclusion, unless continued for at least 24 hours at the same daily dose as during the 24 hours before inclusion.
  • Weak or strong opioid analgesics ongoing or within 3 days before inclusion.
  • Signs suggesting a condition requiring additional investigations according to the investigator, except rapid streptococcal throat testing.
  • Signs suggesting a condition requiring corticosteroid prescription according to the investigator.
  • Systemic disease, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, or Behçet disease.
  • Any contraindication listed in OROSEDAL instructions for use.
  • Known allergy to any OROSEDAL component, including glycerol, tamarind extract, mallow extract, benzyl alcohol, orange blossom flavoring, or xylitol.
  • Non-compliance with precautions for use listed in the instructions for use.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Patients treated with OROSEDAL
Children and adults aged 8 years or older consulting a general practitioner for sore throat or a minor oral lesion, for whom OROSEDAL has been prescribed in routine care before study inclusion.
Device: OROSEDAL
OROSEDAL is an oral spray medical device used according to its instructions for use or according to the physician's prescription. It acts mechanically through barrier-forming and hydrating effects intended to soothe irritation and relieve pain in sore throat, aphthous ulcers, oral lichen planus, and minor mouth lesions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain responder rate at Day 1
Time Frame: Day 1 evening
Percentage of patients with a reduction >20 mm in global pain intensity over the previous 24 hours, measured on a 0-100 mm visual analog scale, between baseline Day 0 and the evening assessment at Day 1. The question asks the patient to rate the global pain over the previous 24 hours related to the sore throat or mouth lesion, with 0 corresponding to no pain and 100 to worst imaginable pain.
Day 1 evening

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain responder rate at Day 6 or end of study
Time Frame: Day 6 ± 1 day or early termination.
Percentage of patients with a reduction >20 mm in global pain intensity over the previous 24 hours, measured on a 0-100 mm visual analog scale, between Day 0 and Day 6 ± 1 day or early termination.
Day 6 ± 1 day or early termination.
Immediate change in instantaneous pain intensity after first application
Time Frame: Day 0: before first application, then 5 minutes, 10 minutes, and 60 minutes after first application.
Change in instantaneous pain intensity related to the sore throat or mouth lesion, measured on a 0-100 mm visual analog scale. The patient rates current pain "at the present moment," with 0 corresponding to no pain and 100 to worst imaginable pain.
Day 0: before first application, then 5 minutes, 10 minutes, and 60 minutes after first application.
Change in global pain intensity over the study period
Time Frame: Day 0 to Day 6 ± 1 day or early termination.
Evolution of global pain intensity over the previous 24 hours, measured repeatedly on a 0-100 mm visual analog scale at inclusion, in the daily self-assessment diary from Day 1 to the day before Day 6, and at Day 6 ± 1 day or early termination.
Day 0 to Day 6 ± 1 day or early termination.
Change in swallowing discomfort
Time Frame: Day 0 to Day 6 ± 1 day or early termination.
Evolution of swallowing discomfort measured on a 5-point numerical scale from 0 to 4: 0 = no discomfort; 1 = mild discomfort; 2 = moderate discomfort; 3 = severe discomfort; 4 = very severe discomfort.
Day 0 to Day 6 ± 1 day or early termination.
Patient global assessment of effectiveness
Time Frame: Day 6 ± 1 day or early termination.
Patient-rated global effectiveness assessed using a 5-point numerical scale: 0 = not effective at all; 1 = very slightly effective; 2 = slightly effective; 3 = fairly effective; 4 = very effective.
Day 6 ± 1 day or early termination.
Evolution of associated clinical signs
Time Frame: Day 0 to Day 6 ± 1 day or early termination
Change in associated signs reported or observed during the study, including fever, headache, and other associated symptoms.
Day 0 to Day 6 ± 1 day or early termination
Adverse events, serious adverse events, incidents, and device deficiencies
Time Frame: From inclusion to Day 6 ± 1 day or early termination.
Number and description of adverse events, serious adverse events, incidents, and device deficiencies reported by the patient in the diary or collected by the investigator at visits. Device deficiencies include any malfunction or inadequacy of the medical device when applicable.
From inclusion to Day 6 ± 1 day or early termination.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Laboratoires Elerte

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Clin-Experts

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Dominique DELSART

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 5, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 27, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 27, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 2, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 27, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2025-A00279-40

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sore Throat

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings