Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia for Open Liver Resection

August 17, 2026 updated by: Nguyen Toan Thang

Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy Between Erector Spinae Plane Block and Thoracic Epidural Analgesia in Open Hepatectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Open liver resection is associated with severe postoperative pain. While thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is considered the gold standard for pain control, its clinical application is often limited by postoperative coagulation profile derangement, which increases the risk of epidural hematoma. Continuous erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has emerged as a promising, safer alternative with a lower risk of bleeding complications. Objective: This study aims to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy, safety profiles, and impacts on respiratory function between ultrasound-guided continuous ESPB and TEA in patients undergoing elective open liver resection. Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that continuous ESPB using a programmed intermittent bolus (PIB) regimen is non-inferior to TEA regarding 72-hour postoperative pain scores at rest, while offering superior hemodynamic stability and fewer technique-related risks.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a randomized, controlled, parallel-group, non-inferiority clinical trial conducted at Bach Mai Hospital. Eligible patients scheduled for elective open liver resection will be randomly allocated into one of two groups at a 1:1 ratio: 1. ESPB Group (n = 30): Patients will receive bilateral erector spinae plane catheters placed at the T7 level under ultrasound guidance prior to anesthesia induction. A bolus of 20 mL Ropivacaine 0.2% will be administered on each side. Postoperative analgesia will be maintained for 72 hours using a Programmed Intermittent Bolus (PIB) regimen of Ropivacaine 0.1%: 20 mL every 3 hours on the right side and 20 mL every 3 hours on the left side. 2. TEA Group (n = 30): Patients will receive a thoracic epidural catheter inserted at the T7-T8 interspace. An initial bolus of 10 mL Ropivacaine 0.2% will be given, followed by a continuous basal infusion of Ropivacaine 0.1% at 5-8 mL/h for 72 hours. Multimodal Analgesia: All patients in both groups will receive a standardized general anesthesia protocol and systemic multimodal analgesia, including intravenous paracetamol (1 g every 6 hours) and nefopam (20 mg every 6 hours). Outcomes Evaluation: The primary outcome is the postoperative pain intensity measured by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at rest 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include NRS pain scores at rest and during coughing at multiple time points up to 72 hours, cumulative 24-hour morphine consumption, hemodynamic parameters, and incidence of adverse events (e.g., hypotension, postoperative nausea and vomiting, hematoma, or catheter failure)

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
63

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Vietnam
    • Kim Lien
      • Hà Nội, Kim Lien, Vietnam
        • Department of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation, Bach Mai Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • * Patients aged between 18 and 80 years old.

    • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification I to III.
    • Scheduled to undergo elective open liver resection (open hepatectomy).
    • Patient provides written informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe coagulation profile derangement prior to surgery (defined as International Normalized Ratio [INR] > 1.5 or 2.0, or Platelet count [PLT] < 50 G/L or 100 G/L).

    • Severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class C).
    • Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD GOLD stage III-IV).
    • Severe cardiac dysfunction with an ejection fraction (EF) < 35%.
    • Severe obesity with a Body Mass Index (BMI) > 40 kg/m².
    • Localized infection at the planned puncture/needle insertion site.
    • Known allergy or hypersensitivity to local anesthetics (e.g., Ropivacaine) or opioids (e.g., Morphine).
    • Pregnancy or current lactation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Erector Spinae Plane Block Group
Patients will receive ultrasound-guided continuous bilateral erector spinae plane block at the T7 level with a programmed intermittent bolus (PIB) regimen of Ropivacaine 0.1% (18 mL/3h on the right side and 18 mL/3h on the left side) for 72 hours postoperatively, combined with systemic multimodal analgesia
Procedure: Continuous Erector Spinae Plane block
Patients will receive ultrasound-guided continuous bilateral erector spinae plane block at the T7 level with a programmed intermittent bolus (PIB) regimen of Ropivacaine 0.1% (18 mL/3h on the right side and 18 mL/3h on the left side) for 72 hours postoperatively, combined with systemic multimodal analgesia
Active Comparator: Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Group
Patients will receive a thoracic epidural catheter inserted at the T7-T8 interspace with a continuous basal infusion of Ropivacaine 0.1% at a rate of 5-8 mL/h for 72 hours postoperatively, combined with systemic multimodal analgesia
Procedure: Thoracic Epidural Analgesia (TEA)
Patients will receive a thoracic epidural catheter inserted at the T7-T8 interspace with a continuous basal infusion of Ropivacaine 0.1% at a rate of 5-8 mL/h for 72 hours postoperatively, combined with systemic multimodal analgesia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative Pain Intensity at Rest at 24 Hours
Time Frame: At 24 hours postoperatively
Postoperative pain intensity evaluated using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst imaginable pain. The score will be recorded at rest exactly 24 hours after the completion of the surgery
At 24 hours postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cumulative Morphine Equivalent Consumption
Time Frame: From 0 to 24 hours postoperatively
The total amount of intravenous morphine equivalents (in milligrams) administered as rescue analgesia to the patient during the first 24 hours after surgery
From 0 to 24 hours postoperatively
Postoperative Pain Intensity at Rest and During Coughing up to 72 Hours
Time Frame: At 0, 1, 3, 6, 12, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively
Pain intensity scores assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10) both at rest and during coughing at multiple scheduled postoperative time intervals
At 0, 1, 3, 6, 12, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively
Incidence of Postoperative Complications and Adverse Events
Time Frame: Up to 72 hours postoperatively
The percentage of patients experiencing technique-related complications (such as local hematoma, catheter dislodgement, block failure) or opioid-related side effects (including postoperative nausea and vomiting, pruritus, urinary retention), as well as pulmonary complications (atelectasis, pneumonia) and hemodynamic instability (hypotension, bradycardia)
Up to 72 hours postoperatively
Time to Gastrointestinal Recovery
Time Frame: Up to 72 hours postoperatively
Evaluation of bowel function recovery, measured by the time (in hours) from the end of surgery to the first passage of flatus (first anal exhaust), and the time (in hours) to the first tolerance of oral intake (solid or liquid food)
Up to 72 hours postoperatively
First Postoperative Night Sleep Quality
Time Frame: On the first postoperative night
The patient's subjective sleep quality during the first night after surgery, evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS for sleep) or the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) subscale, where sleep disruption and total sleep duration are assessed
On the first postoperative night
Postoperative Length of Hospital Stay
Time Frame: From the day of surgery to hospital discharge (estimated up to 14 days)
The total number of days from the completion of the surgical procedure to the day the patient is officially discharged from the hospital, meeting predefined standard discharge criteria
From the day of surgery to hospital discharge (estimated up to 14 days)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Nguyen Toan Thang

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 15, 2026

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 15, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 15, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 8, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 8, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 11, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 19, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 17, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB-BMH-ĐT.RG-2026.12.Đ11

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The individual patient data will not be shared publicly to maintain patient confidentiality and privacy in accordance with local institutional regulations. The aggregated results will be published in the final thesis and scientific journals

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings