Use of a Mobile Brain-Body Imaging Approach to Evaluate the Effects of Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation on Gait and Brain Function in Alzheimer's Disease

June 17, 2026 updated by: Lou Awad, PT, DPT, PhD, Boston University Charles River Campus
Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is associated with impairments in both gait and cognition, significantly increasing fall risk. Falls are a leading cause of injury-related disability in older adults, and individuals with AD experience a nearly threefold higher rate of falls compared to neurotypical older adults. There is an urgent need for fall prevention interventions tailored to the unique deficits of individuals with AD. Converging evidence suggests that interventions aiming to reduce fall risk in AD should target both gait and cognition. Rhythmic music interventions, such as Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation (RAS) can harness global brain activation and auditory-motor entrainment to facilitate high-intensity exercise to alleviate AD-related neurocognitive and gait dysfunction. This study aims to assess the neural correlates of gait dysfunction in people with AD, evaluate if baseline neurocognitive impairment is predictive of the effects of RAS, and evaluate RAS benefits for individuals with AD.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

  1. Background and Scientific Rationale: Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by the accumulation of amyloid-beta plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles, leading to widespread cortical and subcortical atrophy. While memory impairment is the most recognized clinical feature, AD also profoundly disrupts motor systems - particularly gait - through degeneration of frontal-subcortical circuits that govern attentional control of movement. Gait deficits in AD include reduced speed, shortened stride length, increased stride variability, and disproportionate cognitive-motor interference during dual-task conditions. These impairments reflect underlying disruptions in prefrontal-motor connectivity and are strongly predictive of fall events.

    Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation (RAS) is an interventional technique that harnesses the coupling between the auditory and motor systems. Rhythmic auditory cues delivered as an isochronous beat (with or without music) activate auditory-motor entrainment pathways, recruiting motor planning circuits in the basal ganglia, supplementary motor area, and cerebellum to promote more stable and efficient gait. RAS has demonstrated efficacy in improving gait parameters in neurological populations including Parkinson's disease and stroke. Its application in AD is motivated by evidence that music-based rhythmic stimuli elicit broad, cross-regional brain activation, including areas relatively spared in early AD, and may therefore provide a viable sensory scaffold for augmenting motor control even as cognitive reserve declines.

  2. Study Design and Overview: This is a single-session, non-randomized clinical trial enrolling 40 subjects -- 20 adults with a clinical diagnosis of AD (restricted to mild cognitive impairment, MCI) and 20 neurotypical older adults serving as a healthy comparison group. All participants complete one study visit conducted at the Boston University Neuromotor Recovery Laboratory (NRL) and/or affiliated BU clinical research facilities.

  3. Specific Aims

    The study pursues three primary aims:

    1. To characterize the neural correlates of gait dysfunction in people with AD using simultaneous brain-body imaging during walking under typical and challenging conditions.
    2. To evaluate whether baseline neurocognitive profile (degree and domain of impairment) predicts individual responsiveness to RAS during walking.
    3. To quantify the acute effects of RAS on gait and functional brain connectivity in individuals with AD compared to neurotypical older adults.
  4. Measurement Framework & Outcome Measures: Mobile Brain-Body Imaging (MoBI): A defining feature of this study is the use of a Mobile Brain-Body Imaging (MoBI) framework consisting of the concurrent capture of neural and biomechanical data during real-time ambulation. Brain activity is measured using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), a non-invasive optical neuroimaging technique that quantifies changes in cortical hemodynamics (oxy- and deoxy-hemoglobin concentration) as a proxy for regional neural activation. Unlike traditional neuroimaging modalities, fNIRS is tolerant of movement artifact, making it well-suited for ambulatory paradigms. Biomechanical gait data are collected concurrently using inertial measurement units (IMUs).
  5. Walking Conditions: Participants will walk overground under multiple conditions designed to vary cognitive and sensorimotor demand: a) walking with and without RAS and b) walking on an altered, gait-destablizing surface (foam mat or rocker-bottom footwear) to increase sensorimotor challenge. These conditions are intended to elicit a gradient of gait and neural responses and to probe the extent to which RAS can attenuate dual-task interference and cognitive-motor coupling deficits characteristic of AD.
  6. Cognitive Assessment: A standardized neuropsychological battery will be administered to all participants with AD to characterize baseline cognitive status and confirm MCI diagnosis. This battery includes the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE), Consortium to Establish a Registry in Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) delayed recall, Boston Naming Test (short form), Trail Making Test A and B, and verbal fluency measures. These assessments will be used to examine relationships between neurocognitive impairment profile and the magnitude of RAS benefit observed during walking.
  7. Significance: This study will generate foundational data linking neural mechanisms of gait dysfunction in AD with behavioral responsiveness to an accessible, non-pharmacological auditory-motor intervention in a population at high fall risk and with limited therapeutic options. Findings are intended to inform participant selection criteria and outcome measure development for future RAS-based clinical trials targeting fall prevention in AD.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Regina Sloutsky, PT, DPT, PhD
  • Phone Number: 617-500-3645
  • Email: reginas@bu.edu

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Louis N Awad, PT, DPT, PhD
  • Phone Number: 617-500-3645
  • Email: louawad@bu.edu

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Recruiting
        • Boston University Neuromotor Recovery Laboratory
        • Contact:
          • Louis N Awad, PT, DPT, PhD
          • Phone Number: 617-500-3645
          • Email: gaitlab@bu.edu

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

General Inclusion (both healthy and AD populations):

  • Community-dwelling
  • Capable of walking short community distances (approximately 10-15 minutes at a time) without assistance from another person or a device (such as a cane).
  • Able to communicate with researchers
  • Age 50-90 (inclusive)

Population-specific Inclusion criteria:

  • Healthy -

    • No diagnosis of AD
  • AD population-

CERAD score of <1.5 SD from age + education adjusted norms on delayed recall domain or one or more other cognitive domains (i.e. language, attention).

MoCA score between 20-30 MMSE score between 25-30

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of significant hearing impairment
  • Current orthopedic, neurologic or other medical condition that limits the ability to walk.

The MOCA, MMSE and CERAD tests will be completed in-person after the participant consents into the study. If the participant is determined to be ineligible based on their performance on these tests (compared to inclusion requirements listed above), they will be informed that they are not eligible for this study and the study visit will be cancelled. They will then be withdrawn from the study; their clinical tests and study documentation will be maintained for the purposes of completeness, but will not be used for any study analyses.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Effects of RAS on gait quality on brain activity in individuals with and without AD
Participants will complete overground walking assessments with and without rhythmic auditory stimulation (RAS) under varying sensorimotor conditions while gait and cortical activity are measured using wearable sensors (IMUs) and portable neuroimaging (fNIRS).
Device: Metronome
Rhythmic Auditory stimulation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional brain network connectivity
Time Frame: within session: baseline (no RAS) and RAS-assisted walking
Functional connectivity between the Dorsal Attention Network and Default Mode Network measured using fNIRS during walking.
within session: baseline (no RAS) and RAS-assisted walking
Stride time variability
Time Frame: within session: baseline (no RAS) and RAS-assisted walking
Variability in stride timing measured using inertial measurement units during walking.
within session: baseline (no RAS) and RAS-assisted walking
Gait speed
Time Frame: within session: baseline (no RAS) and RAS-assisted walking
Average walking speed measured in meters per second during overground walking.
within session: baseline (no RAS) and RAS-assisted walking

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Boston University Charles River Campus

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute on Aging (NIA)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Louis N Awad, PT, DPT, PhD, Boston University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 15, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 17, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 22, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 17, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 8203
  • 5U24AG084436-02 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in publications arising from this study will be made available. Shared data may include participant demographics, clinical characteristics, gait and biomechanical measures, neurophysiological measures, metronome settings for delivery of RAS, and other study variables necessary to reproduce published findings. Data will be de-identified prior to sharing in accordance with applicable regulations and institutional policies.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will become available following publication of the primary study results or within 12 months of study completion, whichever occurs first, and will remain available for at least 5 years thereafter.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

De-identified data and supporting documentation will be made available to qualified researchers for scientifically sound research purposes. Requests will be reviewed by the study investigators and may require a data use agreement. Access will be provided in accordance with participant consent, institutional policies, and applicable regulations.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)

Clinical Trials on Metronome

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings