DCB Outcomes After Non-Compliant Balloon Vessel Preparation With or Without Scoring in Patients With Femoropopliteal Arterial Disease (DASBAD-NC)
Drug-coated Balloon Angioplasty After Non-Compliant Balloon Vessel Preparation With or Without Scoring for Femoropopliteal Arterial Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial
The aim of this clinical trial is to determine whether vessel preparation with a non-compliant scoring balloon before drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty provides superior procedural and clinical outcomes compared with vessel preparation using a non-compliant plain balloon in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) undergoing femoropopliteal endovascular intervention.
The main questions the study aims to answer are:
- Does non-compliant scoring balloon vessel preparation reduce the need for bailout stenting during the index procedure?
- Does it improve primary patency after DCB angioplasty?
- Does it improve clinically relevant outcomes such as wound healing, freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularisation, limb salvage and health-related quality of life?
- Does it provide procedural and economic advantages compared with non-compliant plain balloon vessel preparation?
Participants will be randomly assigned to undergo vessel preparation using either a non-compliant plain balloon or the DKutting™ non-compliant scoring balloon, followed by angioplasty with the Legflow XP™ drug-coated balloon. Patients will undergo clinical, duplex ultrasound and quality-of-life follow-up for 24 months.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The DASBAD-NC trial is a prospective, multicentre, randomised, patient-blinded, controlled clinical investigation designed to compare two vessel preparation strategies before drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty for femoropopliteal arterial disease in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (Rutherford classification 4-5).
Eligible patients with significant atherosclerotic femoropopliteal disease (≥50% stenosis or chronic total occlusion) will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio, after successful guidewire crossing of the target lesion and confirmation of all eligibility criteria, to one of two treatment strategies:
- Vessel preparation using a non-compliant plain balloon (PBA arm), followed by Legflow XP™ drug-coated balloon angioplasty.
- Vessel preparation using the DKutting™ non-compliant scoring balloon (SB arm), followed by Legflow XP™ drug-coated balloon angioplasty.
Vessel preparation will be performed using a 1:1 balloon-to-reference vessel diameter ratio with a minimum inflation time of 180 seconds. Predilatation with a smaller balloon will only be permitted if the allocated study balloon cannot cross the lesion. Drug-coated balloon angioplasty will subsequently be performed using the Legflow XP™ drug-coated balloon according to the study protocol. Bailout stenting will only be permitted in the presence of residual stenosis ≥30% and/or flow-limiting dissection after DCB treatment.
The co-primary endpoints are bailout stenting during the index procedure and primary patency at 12 months. Secondary endpoints include freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularisation, target limb major amputation, all-cause mortality, wound healing, health-related quality of life, procedural success, slow-flow phenomenon, procedural costs and other prespecified clinical and imaging outcomes.
Duplex ultrasound follow-up examinations will undergo blinded central review by an independent duplex ultrasound core laboratory. Procedural angiographic outcomes will undergo an independent blinded quality assurance review after database lock by experienced investigators according to the prespecified study methodology. Clinical events will be adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee according to prespecified endpoint definitions.
Patients will be followed for 24 months after the index procedure.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Marc Sirvent, PhD
- Phone Number: 2575 +34938425000
- Email: msirvent@fphag.org
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- ≥18 years of age.
- Rutherford class 4-5.
- Estimated life expectancy >1 year, per investigator's judgment.
- Significant atherosclerotic lesions (≥50% stenosis or chronic total occlusion) in the femoropopliteal segment, including in-stent restenosis.
- Signed informed consent.
- Willingness to comply with follow-up visits.
- ≥1 patent infragenicular artery (<50% stenosis) at the end of the procedure.
- Target vessel diameter ≤8 mm.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant or planning pregnancy during the study.
- Participation in another drug/device trial.
- Inability to cross the target lesion with a guidewire. Successful crossing is defined as advancement of the guidewire tip distal to the target lesion without vessel perforation or flow-limiting dissection.
- Inadequate treatment of proximal lesion (>30% residual stenosis).
- Severe calcification of the target vessel [group 4 of Fanelli classification17 defined as circumferential calcification (270º-360º)], evidenced before contrast injection or digital subtraction angiography.
- Thrombus in the target vessel.
- Anastomotic stenosis of a bypass.
- Use of atherectomy, thrombectomy, laser, or similar devices.
- Prior or planned above-the-ankle amputation of the target limb.
- Coagulopathy, hypercoagulable state, bleeding diathesis, platelets <80 000/µL or >700 000/µL, or other blood disorder.
- Gastrointestinal bleeding requiring transfusion within 3 months.
- Contraindication to antiplatelet/anticoagulant/thrombolytic therapy.
- Acute coronary syndrome within 30 days.
- Stroke or TIA within 90 days.
- Hypersensitivity/contraindication to nitinol.
- Comorbidities precluding treatment or follow-up (per investigator).
- Hypersensitivity/allergy to contrast not manageable medically.
- Hypersensitivity/allergy to heparin, aspirin, paclitaxel, clopidogrel, or other antiplatelet/anticoagulant agents.
- Contraindication to dual antiplatelet therapy.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Non-compliant plain balloon (PBA)
|
The intervention consists of preparing the artery with a non-compliant plain balloon before using the DCB (Legflow XP™; Manufacturer: Cardionovum GmbH Bonn, Germany).
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Scoring balloon (SB)
|
The intervention consists of preparing the artery with a non-compliant scoring balloon (DKutting™; Manufacturer: DK Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China) before using the DCB (Legflow XP™; Manufacturer: Cardionovum GmbH Bonn, Germany) as definitve treatment.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Bailout stenting
Time Frame: At index procedure
|
The need for bailout stenting during the index procedure, defined as stent implantation due to residual stenosis >30% or a flow-limiting dissection (type C according to the Kobayashi classification)
|
At index procedure
|
|
Primary Patency
Time Frame: At 12 months
|
Primary patency at 12 months defined as absence of ≥50% restenosis (peak systolic velocity ratio<2.5)
and no clinically driven target lesion revascularisation (CD-TLR), as adjudicated by the duplex core laboratory and the Clinical Events Committee.
|
At 12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Device success
Time Frame: During the index procedure
|
Device success, defined as successful delivery, inflation, and retrieval of the assigned balloon catheter, resulting in a residual stenosis <30% without flow-limiting dissection (FLD) on final angiography.
|
During the index procedure
|
|
Technical success
Time Frame: During the index procedure.
|
Technical success, defined as successful use of a device or technique to re-establish vessel patency with a residual stenosis <30% by visual estimation and <50% by duplex during the index procedure.
|
During the index procedure.
|
|
Procedural cost
Time Frame: During the index procedure
|
Procedural cost, defined as the total acquisition cost (€) of all lesion preparation balloons (including adjunctive predilatation balloons, if required) and bailout stents used during the index procedure for the target lesion.
|
During the index procedure
|
|
Slow-flow phenomenon
Time Frame: During the index procedure
|
Slow-flow phenomenon, defined as an angiographic reduction in antegrade flow occurring after DCB inflation compared with the immediately preceding angiogram, in the absence of residual stenosis >30%, flow-limiting dissection, or vasospasm.
The presence or absence of slow-flow phenomenon will be determined by the independent blinded angiographic review.
|
During the index procedure
|
|
Procedural success
Time Frame: Occurring <24 hours and <1 month of the index procedure.
|
Procedural success, defined as technical success with absence of rupture, distal embolization, thrombosis, access complications, or major adverse cardiovascular events.
These events should be listed as occurring <24 hours and <1 month of the procedure.
|
Occurring <24 hours and <1 month of the index procedure.
|
|
Freedom from device and procedure-related death
Time Frame: Until 30 days post-procedure
|
Freedom from device and procedure-related death through 30 days post-procedure.
|
Until 30 days post-procedure
|
|
Freedom from Major Adverse Events (MAE)
Time Frame: Up to 24 months post-procedure
|
Freedom from Major Adverse Events (MAE) up to 24 months post-procedure. MAE are defined as the composite of:
|
Up to 24 months post-procedure
|
|
Primary patency
Time Frame: At 6 and 24 months post-procedure
|
Primary patency at 6 and 24 months post-procedure, defined as absence of ≥50% restenosis (peak systolic velocity ratio<2.5)
and no CD-TLR, as adjudicated by the duplex core laboratory and the Clinical Events Committee (CEC).
|
At 6 and 24 months post-procedure
|
|
Freedom from CD-TLR
Time Frame: Up to 24 months post-procedure
|
Freedom from CD-TLR up to 24 months post-procedure.
|
Up to 24 months post-procedure
|
|
Change in EQ-5D questionnaire
Time Frame: Up to 24 months post-procedure
|
Change in EQ-5D questionnaire from baseline up to 24 months post-procedure
|
Up to 24 months post-procedure
|
|
Amputation free survival
Time Frame: Up to 24 months post-procedure.
|
Amputation free survival up to 24 months post-procedure. • Amputation free survival is defined as survival without above-the-ankle amputation of the target limb. |
Up to 24 months post-procedure.
|
|
Wound healing evolution
Time Frame: Up to 24 months post-procedure
|
Wound healing evolution up to 24 months post-procedure, assessed according to the following predefined ordinal classification:
|
Up to 24 months post-procedure
|
|
Wound healing time
Time Frame: Days from the index procedure to complete epithelialisation of the target wound
|
Wound healing time is defined as the number of days from the index procedure to complete epithelialisation of the target wound, without drainage or need for dressing, as assessed by the treating physician. • Major amputation of the index limb or death prior to complete wound healing will be considered failure of the wound healing endpoint. |
Days from the index procedure to complete epithelialisation of the target wound
|
|
Change in Rutherford classification
Time Frame: Up to 24 months post-procedure.
|
Change in Rutherford classification up to 24 months post-procedure.
|
Up to 24 months post-procedure.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Vascular Diseases
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Pathologic Processes
- Chronic Disease
- Disease Attributes
- Atherosclerosis
- Arteriosclerosis
- Arterial Occlusive Diseases
- Peripheral Vascular Diseases
- Ischemia
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia
- Peripheral Arterial Disease
- Investigative Techniques
- Epidemiologic Research Design
- Epidemiologic Methods
- Research Design
- Methods
- Control Groups
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- DASBAD-NC
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.