Station 4L Lymph Node Dissection Versus No Dissection in Clinical Stage I Solid Nodule-Type Invasive NSCLC

August 28, 2026 updated by: Haiquan Chen, Fudan University

A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Station 4L Lymph Node Dissection Versus No Dissection in Clinical Stage I Solid Nodule-Type Invasive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

This multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial will enroll adults aged 18 to 75 years with resectable clinical stage I (T1-T2aN0M0) invasive non-small cell lung cancer presenting as a single solid nodule (consolidation-to-tumor ratio 1.0) in the left lung. After intraoperative frozen-section confirmation of invasive non-small cell lung cancer and completion of standard lung resection and systematic mediastinal lymph node dissection, participants will be randomly assigned 1:1 either to undergo station 4L lymph node dissection or to omit station 4L dissection. The primary hypothesis is that omitting station 4L dissection is noninferior to performing it with respect to 3-year disease-free survival. Secondary outcomes include 3-year overall survival, perioperative complications, 90-day mortality, and station 4L nodal metastasis.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Station 4L lymph nodes are located in a technically challenging area near the aortic arch, left pulmonary artery, thoracic duct, and left recurrent laryngeal nerve. Dissection may improve nodal staging but may also increase operative complexity and complications. This study will evaluate whether station 4L dissection can be omitted without compromising long-term outcomes in patients with early-stage left-sided invasive non-small cell lung cancer.

Eligible participants will undergo complete resection by segmentectomy or lobectomy and systematic mediastinal lymph node dissection. After intraoperative frozen-section confirmation of invasive non-small cell lung cancer, participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to station 4L lymph node dissection or no station 4L dissection. Randomization is stratified by tumor lobe. The planned enrollment is 384 participants, including 258 with left upper lobe tumors and 126 with left lower lobe tumors.

Participants will be followed every 6 months for 3 years after surgery. The primary comparison is 3-year disease-free survival. Secondary assessments include 3-year overall survival, surgery-related complications within 30 days, all-cause mortality within 90 days, and the frequency of station 4L nodal metastasis among participants assigned to station 4L dissection.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
384

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Xuhui
      • Shanghai, Xuhui, China, 200000
        • Recruiting
        • Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 to 75 years.
  • A single solid pulmonary nodule (consolidation-to-tumor ratio of 1.0) located in the left lung.
  • Resectable clinical stage I (T1-T2aN0M0) non-small cell lung cancer, with a maximum tumor diameter of 4 cm or less, evaluated by positron emission tomography/computed tomography.
  • Planned complete lung resection by segmentectomy or lobectomy with systematic mediastinal lymph node dissection.
  • Intraoperative frozen-section pathological confirmation of invasive non-small cell lung cancer before randomization.
  • Able to provide written informed consent and willing to complete the protocol-specified follow-up.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Intraoperative or postoperative pathology indicates noninvasive non-small cell lung cancer.
  • Surgical procedure other than segmentectomy or lobectomy.
  • Incomplete tumor resection or residual tumor.
  • History of another malignant tumor.
  • History of previous lung surgery.
  • Previous radiotherapy or chemotherapy for the current lung cancer.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Station 4L Lymph Node Dissection
Participants undergo complete lung resection and systematic mediastinal lymph node dissection, including surgical dissection of station 4L lymph nodes.
Procedure: Station 4L Lymph Node Dissection
During complete lung resection and systematic mediastinal lymph node dissection, all lymphatic and fatty tissue in the station 4L region is surgically removed and submitted for pathological examination. Other mediastinal stations are dissected according to the study protocol in both arms.
No Intervention: No Station 4L Lymph Node Dissection
Participants undergo complete lung resection and systematic mediastinal lymph node dissection, but station 4L lymph nodes are not surgically removed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
3-Year Disease-Free Survival
Time Frame: From enrollment to 3 years
Proportion of participants alive without disease recurrence. A disease-free survival event is the first documented recurrence of non-small cell lung cancer or death from any cause.
From enrollment to 3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
3-Year Overall Survival
Time Frame: From enrollment to 3 years
Proportion of participants alive 3 years after enrollment. Death from any cause is counted as an event.
From enrollment to 3 years
30-Day Surgery-Related Complication Rate
Time Frame: From surgery through postoperative day 30
Proportion of participants with at least one surgery-related complication, graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0.
From surgery through postoperative day 30
90-Day All-Cause Mortality
Time Frame: From surgery through postoperative day 90
Proportion of participants who die from any cause within 90 days after surgery.
From surgery through postoperative day 90
Station 4L Lymph Node Metastasis Rate
Time Frame: At postoperative pathological assessment, up to 30 days after surgery
Among participants assigned to station 4L lymph node dissection, the proportion with pathologically confirmed metastasis in resected station 4L lymph nodes.
At postoperative pathological assessment, up to 30 days after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Fudan University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Haiquan Chen, Fudan University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 15, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 15, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 15, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 28, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 28, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 3, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 3, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 28, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ECTOP-1034

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings