Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Versus High Power Laser for Diabetic Neuropathy (HBOT-HPLT-DPN)

September 25, 2026 updated by: Mostafa Mahmoud Mohamed Youssef Khalifa, Cairo University

Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Versus High Power Laser Therapy On Sensorimotor Functions In Patients With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical effects of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT) versus High-Intensity Laser Therapy (HPLT) on sensorimotor functions and nerve conduction in patients suffering from painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Participants are divided into three equal groups. The first group receives a traditional physiotherapy program focused on ankle and foot exercises. The second group receives hyperbaric oxygen therapy sessions in addition to the traditional program. The third group receives high-power MLS laser therapy alongside the traditional program. Investigators look at whether either advanced intervention shows superiority in improving nerve functionality and reducing neuropathic pain.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a major microvascular complication of diabetes leading to progressive nerve damage and neuropathic pain. This randomized controlled trial evaluates and compares the efficacy of two non-pharmacological interventions: Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT) and High-Intensity Laser Therapy (HPLT).

A total of 66 medically controlled patients with painful diabetic neuropathy are randomly assigned into three equal parallel groups (22 patients per group):

  • Control Group (A): Receives a traditional physiotherapy program including foot and ankle ROM exercises, strengthening, and functional walking training for 5 sessions per week for 3 weeks.
  • Study Group (B): Receives Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (100% oxygen at 2.5 ATA for 60 minutes, totaling 90 minutes per session) for 15 sessions over 3 weeks, combined with the traditional physiotherapy program.
  • Study Group (C): Receives High-Power Laser Therapy using a Multiwave Locked System (MLS) laser device (1500 Hz frequency) applied every other day for 9 sessions over 3 weeks, combined with the traditional physiotherapy program.

Assessments are conducted before and after the 3-week treatment period using objective Nerve Conduction Studies (NCS) for the sural and common peroneal nerves, and subjective screening via the Arabic Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) score.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

66

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Cairo Governorate
      • Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt, 11771
        • Kobri El Koba Military Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus for more than 5 years.
  • Presence of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy lasting for more than 6 months.
  • Presence of sensory abnormalities, burning pain, and impaired nerve conduction velocity in the lower extremities.
  • Medically controlled glycemic status.
  • Sufficient cognitive abilities with a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score greater than 24.
  • Fit for hyperbaric pressure therapy with a cardiac ejection fraction (CEF) equal to or greater than 50% and blood pressure equal to or less than 150/90 mmHg.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Peripheral neuropathy resulting from causes other than diabetes (e.g., vitamin B12 deficiency, alcohol abuse, or trauma).
  • Severe vascular insufficiency in the lower limbs.
  • Uncontrolled medical conditions such as tumors or thyroid dysfunction.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Presence of metallic implantations or cardiac pacemakers.
  • Severe visual, auditory, or cognitive impairment (MMSE score less than 24).
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or other contraindications to hyperbaric oxygen therapy.
  • History of other neurological diseases (e.g., stroke or multiple sclerosis).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional Physiotherapy

Foot and ankle range of motion (ROM) exercises, strengthening exercises, functional exercises, and walking training (5 sessions per week for 3 weeks).

Foot and ankle range of motion (ROM) exercises, strengthening exercises, functional exercises, and walking training (5 sessions per week for 3 weeks)

Experimental: Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT)

Conventional physiotherapy program plus HBOT sessions (100% oxygen at 2.5 ATA for 60 minutes, with 15 minutes gradual compression and 15 minutes decompression, totaling 90 minutes per session). 15 sessions over 3 weeks.

100% oxygen inhalation at 2.5 ATA pressure for 60 minutes inside a hyperbaric chamber.

Other Names:
  • HPOT
Experimental: High-Power Laser Therapy (HPLT)

Conventional physiotherapy program plus HPLT (MLS laser, M6). Applied every other day for 9 sessions over 3 weeks. Includes a remote foot scan followed by contact application on 7 specific lower extremity areas.

MLS laser (M6 device) at 1500 Hz frequency, applied every other day for 9 sessions over 3 weeks. Includes a remote foot scan followed by contact application on 7 specific lower extremity areas.

Other Names:
  • HPLT

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) score
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 weeks post-treatment

The Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) questionnaire was used to assess symptoms of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Abnormal responses were summed to obtain the total score. The questionnaire score ranges from 0 to 13, with higher scores indicating greater neuropathic symptom burden.

Baseline and 3 weeks post-treatment
Change in right sural nerve distal sensory latency
Time Frame: Baseline and after 3 weeks of treatment

Right sural nerve distal sensory latency was assessed using nerve conduction studies and measured in milliseconds (ms).

Baseline and after 3 weeks of treatment
Change in left sural nerve distal sensory latency
Time Frame: Baseline and after 3 weeks of treatment

Left sural nerve distal sensory latency was assessed using nerve conduction studies and measured in milliseconds (ms).

Baseline and after 3 weeks of treatment
Change in right sural nerve sensory amplitude
Time Frame: Baseline and after 3 weeks of treatment

Right sural nerve sensory amplitude was assessed using nerve conduction studies and measured in microvolts (µV).

Baseline and after 3 weeks of treatment
Change in left sural nerve sensory amplitude
Time Frame: Baseline and after 3 weeks of treatment

Left sural nerve sensory amplitude was assessed using nerve conduction studies and measured in microvolts (µV).

Baseline and after 3 weeks of treatment
Change in right sural nerve conduction velocity
Time Frame: Baseline and after 3 weeks of treatment

Right sural nerve conduction velocity was assessed using nerve conduction studies and measured in meters per second (m/s).

Baseline and after 3 weeks of treatment
Change in left sural nerve conduction velocity
Time Frame: Baseline and after 3 weeks of treatment

Left sural nerve conduction velocity was assessed using nerve conduction studies and measured in meters per second (m/s).

Baseline and after 3 weeks of treatment
Change in right peroneal nerve distal motor latency
Time Frame: Baseline and after 3 weeks of treatment

Right peroneal nerve distal motor latency was assessed using nerve conduction studies and measured in milliseconds (ms).

Baseline and after 3 weeks of treatment
Change in left peroneal nerve distal motor latency
Time Frame: Baseline and after 3 weeks of treatment

Left peroneal nerve distal motor latency was assessed using nerve conduction studies and measured in milliseconds (ms).

Baseline and after 3 weeks of treatment
Change in right peroneal nerve motor amplitude
Time Frame: Baseline and after 3 weeks of treatment

Right peroneal nerve motor amplitude was assessed using nerve conduction studies and measured in millivolts (mV).

Baseline and after 3 weeks of treatment
Change in left peroneal nerve motor amplitude
Time Frame: Baseline and after 3 weeks of treatment

Left peroneal nerve motor amplitude was assessed using nerve conduction studies and measured in millivolts (mV).

Baseline and after 3 weeks of treatment
Change in right peroneal nerve motor conduction velocity
Time Frame: Baseline and after 3 weeks of treatment

Right peroneal nerve motor conduction velocity was assessed using nerve conduction studies and measured in meters per second (m/s).

Baseline and after 3 weeks of treatment
Change in left peroneal nerve motor conduction velocit
Time Frame: Baseline and after 3 weeks of treatment

Left peroneal nerve motor conduction velocity was assessed using nerve conduction studies and measured in meters per second (m/s).

Baseline and after 3 weeks of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 6, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

July 6, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 31, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

September 30, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 30, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2026

Last Verified

September 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • P.T.REC/012/005181

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will not be shared outside the research team to maintain patient privacy and data confidentiality in accordance with institutional guidelines.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.