INSL3 as a Biomarker of Pubertal Activation: Role in Evaluating Precocious and Delayed Puberty (INSL3GNRH)

September 30, 2026 updated by: Federico Baronio, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

INSL3 as an Early Marker of Pubertal Activation: Evaluation of Its Potential Role as a New Biomarker in the Diagnosis of Central Precocious Puberty and Delayed Puberty.

This is an observational study in children up to 16 years old who are suspected of having central precocious puberty or delayed puberty. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Can the level of insulin-like peptide 3 (INSL3) predict if a child's puberty has truly started?
  • Can this marker help reduce the need for more complex and invasive tests?

Participants will:

  • Give one extra blood sample just before starting the standard gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) stimulation test (during the baseline blood draw).
  • Have this extra sample used to measure the INSL3 hormone.
  • Complete the rest of the GnRH test as prescribed by their doctor.

Researchers will compare the INSL3 hormone levels in children who have a positive GnRH test to those who have a negative test. This will help researchers learn if INSL3 can be used as a new, simple tool to diagnose early or delayed puberty.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Diagnosing the exact onset of puberty, especially in its early stages, is a clinical challenge. Currently, the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) stimulation test is the gold standard for evaluating hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis activation. However, this test is invasive, time-consuming, expensive, and may have limited sensitivity during the very early phases of Central Precocious Puberty (CPP) or Delayed Puberty (DP).

INSL3 is produced constitutively by Leydig cells in males and theca cells of growing antral follicles in females. Unlike other hormones which are secreted with acute and pulsatile patterns, INSL3 exhibits minimal circadian variation and reflects the continuous maturation of gonadal tissues.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate INSL3 as an early marker of pubertal activation. By correlating basal INSL3 levels, measured via ELISA, with the outcomes of standard GnRH tests and other clinical parameters, the investigators hope to determine if INSL3 can accurately predict HPG axis activation. Ultimately, validating this biomarker could lead to a simpler, single-sample diagnostic approach, reducing the burden of dynamic stimulation testing in pediatric practice.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Italy
      • Bologna, Italy, 40138
        • Recruiting
        • IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Bologna 40138
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

1 second to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Pediatric patients of both sexes, aged 0 to 16 years, who are followed for suspected Central Precocious Puberty (CPP) or suspected Delayed Puberty (DP) at the Pediatric Endocrinology Unit of the IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria of Bologna. These patients must have a clinical indication to undergo a standard GnRH stimulation test as part of their routine diagnostic workup for pubertal evaluation.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 0 and 16 years at the time of enrollment.
  • Males with suspected Central Precocious Puberty (CPP), defined by a testicular volume ≥4 mL before 9 years of age.
  • Females with suspected CPP, defined by the onset of thelarche before 8 years of age.
  • Males with suspected Delayed Puberty (DP), defined by testicular volume <4 mL by 14 years of age.
  • Females with suspected DP, defined by the absence of thelarche by 13 years of age.
  • Written informed consent for study participation and personal data processing provided by the parents/legal guardians, with the assent of the participating minor.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of congenital or acquired conditions known to primarily alter pubertal development or gonadal function, regardless of HPG axis physiology (e.g., disorders of sex development, anorchia, previous ovariectomy, uncorrected bilateral cryptorchidism, previous iatrogenic gonadotoxicity).
  • Primary endocrine diseases interfering with hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis regulation (e.g., congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, panhypopituitarism).
  • Use of hormonal therapies or drugs capable of modifying gonadal function or the response to the GnRH test (e.g., exogenous sex steroids, androgens/anabolic steroids).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: COHORT
  • Time Perspectives: PROSPECTIVE

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Suspected Central Precocious Puberty (CPP)

Pediatric patients (males under 9 years, females under 8 years) with clinical signs of early pubertal onset, undergoing a standard GnRH stimulation test.
Suspected Delayed Puberty (DP)

Pediatric patients (males 14 years and older, females 13 years and older) with absent signs of puberty, undergoing a standard GnRH stimulation test.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Baseline INSL3 Concentration as a Predictor of GnRH Test Outcome
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to GnRH test administration)

Assessment of baseline Insulin-like peptide 3 (INSL3) levels (measured in pg/ml) and their association with the gonadotropin response to the standard GnRH stimulation test (evaluated by peak LH, peak FSH in mU/ml, and LH/FSH ratio) to determine Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Gonadal (HPG) axis activation in patients with suspected precocious or delayed puberty.
Baseline (prior to GnRH test administration)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic Accuracy of Combined INSL3 and Clinical Parameters
Time Frame: Baseline

Evaluation of whether integrating baseline INSL3 (pg/ml) with other clinical and laboratory parameters (bone age in years, uterine longitudinal diameter in cm and volume in ml, basal LH/FSH in mU/ml, estradiol in pg/ml, and testosterone in ng/ml) improves the ability to distinguish patients with a positive GnRH test from those with a negative test.
Baseline
Correlation Between INSL3 and Pubertal Development Parameters
Time Frame: Baseline

Assessment of the correlation between baseline INSL3 levels (pg/ml) and key physiological parameters of pubertal development, including bone age, baseline gonadotropins, sex steroids, and, in females, uterine dimensions.
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 2, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 30, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 30, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 6, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 30, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • INSL3GNRH

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data (IPD) underlying the results of this study will be shared upon reasonable request to the Principal Investigator. The shared data will include clinical, auxological, biochemical, and instrumental parameters used for the analyses, provided in a completely anonymous format to protect participant privacy.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Following the publication of the study results.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data will be shared upon reasonable request submitted to the Principal Investigator.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings