Telbivudine Versus Lamivudine in Adults With Decompensated Chronic Hepatitis B and Evidence of Cirrhosis

August 4, 2011 updated by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Randomized, Double-Blind Trial of Telbivudine Versus Lamivudine in Adults With Decompensated Chronic Hepatitis B and Evidence of Cirrhosis

This research study was conducted to compare the safety and effectiveness of the investigational medication, LdT (Telbivudine) versus Lamivudine, a drug currently approved by the US, European and Asian Health Authorities for the treatment of Hepatitis B infection. The results for patients taking LdT will be compared to results for patients taking lamivudine.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Multicenter, multinational, randomized, double-blind study designed to compare the safety and efficacy of telbivudine (600 mg/day) versus lamivudine (100 mg/day) for 104 weeks in adults with decompensated chronic hepatitis B and evidence of cirrhosis. Patients were pre-stratified by screening Child-Turcotte-Pugh score (CTP score < 9 or ≥ 9) and ALT level (within normal limits (WNL) or > 1.0 x ULN) to help assure similar degrees of hepatic insufficiency and liver inflammation on both treatment arms. After 104 weeks of treatment, participants were followed-up with for an additional 16 weeks.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

232

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Heidelburg, Australia
      • Winnipeg, Canada
      • Hong Kong, China
      • Villejuif Cedex, France
      • Hannover, Germany
      • New Delhi, India
        • Novartis
      • Tel Aviv, Israel
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
      • Riga, Latvia
        • Novartis
      • Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
        • Novartis
      • Auckland, New Zealand
      • Krakow, Poland
        • Novartis
      • Moscow, Russian Federation
        • Novartis
      • Singapore, Singapore
      • Barcelona, Spain
      • Taipei, Taiwan
      • Bangkok, Thailand
      • Istanbul, Turkey
        • Novartis
      • London, United Kingdom
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States
    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States
      • Hanoi, Vietnam
        • Novartis

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 70 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Documented decompensated chronic hepatitis B defined by all of the following: 1. Clinical history compatible with decompensated chronic hepatitis B related cirrhosis; 2. Child-Turcotte-Pugh score > 7 points.
  • Evidence of hepatic cirrhosis or portal hypertension.

Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is pregnant or breastfeeding.
  • Patient is coinfected with hepatitis C virus (HCV), hepatitis D virus (HDV), or Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
  • Patient previously received lamivudine, adefovir, or an investigational anti-hepatitis B virus (HBV) nucleoside or nucleotide analog at any time
  • Patient has received interferon or other immunomodulatory treatment for HBV infection in the 12 months before Screening for this study.

Other protocol-defined exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Telbivudine 600 mg
Participants received Telbivudine 600 mg and a matching lamivudine placebo orally once a day for up to 104 weeks. Participants were followed-up for 16 weeks post-treatment.
600mg/day oral tablet for 104 weeks
Other Names:
  • LDT600
Telbivudine matching placebo or lamivudine matching placebo tablet.
Active Comparator: Lamivudine 100 mg
Lamivudine 100 mg and a Telbivudine matching placebo orally once a day for up to 104 weeks. Participants were followed-up for 16 weeks post-treatment.
Telbivudine matching placebo or lamivudine matching placebo tablet.
100mg/day oral tablet for 104 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Clinical Response
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 52
Clinical response defined as achieving all of the following 3 criteria on at least 2 consecutive visits or at the last on-treatment visit: Serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA < 4 log10 copies/mL, normal Alanine transaminase (ALT) level (ALT ≤ Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)), and improvement (a 2- point or greater reduction in Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score) or stabilization (not more than a 1-point change in CTP score), compared to the baseline value. CTP scores range from 5-15, higher scores indicate more liver impairment. For Improvement/Stabilization, either of the individual criteria were met.
From Baseline to Week 52

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Initial Clinical Response
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 104
Time to Clinical Response defined as the number of days elapsed from the baseline visit to achieving initial Clinical Response.
From Baseline to Week 104
Duration of Initial Clinical Response
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 104
Kaplan-Meier method was used. The duration was calculated as: date of last visit before initial loss of clinical response - date of initial clinical response occurred+1. If a patient did not lose clinical response, it was then censored at the efficacy overall censoring date.
Baseline to Week 104
Number of Participants With Improvement, Stabilization, and Worsening in Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) Score at Week 52 and Week 104
Time Frame: From Baseline to weeks 52 and 104
Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) uses 2 clinical variables, ascites and encephalopathy, and 3 laboratory parameters, serum bilirubin, albumin, and prothrombin time. Each variable is assigned a score from 1 to 3, with the combined score comprising the CTP score range of 5 to 15 points. Higher scores indicate more impaired liver function. "Worsening" of CTP score was defined as a 2-point or greater increase from baseline, "improvement" in CTP score was defined as a 2-point or greater reduction from baseline, and "stabilization" of CTP score was defined as a change of 1-point or less from baseline.
From Baseline to weeks 52 and 104
Number of Participants With Improvement, Stabilization, and Worsening in a Modified (3-component) CTP Score
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 104
Modified CTP was calculated using the 3 biochemical-components (serum bilirubin, albumin, and prothrombin). Total scores range from 3-9; higher scores indicate more liver impairment. Improvement was defined as 2-point or greater reduction in score from baseline. Stabilization comprises a score change of 1-point or less from baseline. Worsening of CTP score was defined as a 2-point or greater increase from baseline. The rationale for assessing changes in this modified (3-component) CTP score is that this maneuver removed the two subjective components of CTP scoring (ascites and encephalopathy).
Baseline and Week 104

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • E.J. Gane, H.L. Chan, G. Choudhuri, D.J. Suh4, A. Chutaputti, R. Safadi, T. Tanwandee, S. Thongsawat, N. Assy, S.K. Sarin, W. Bao, A. Trylesinski, C. Avila. TREATMENT OF DECOMPENSATED HBV-CIRRHOSIS: RESULTS FROM 2-YEARS RANDOMIZED TRIAL WITH TELBIVUDINE OR LAMIVUDINE. Journal of Hepatology 52, Supplement 1, Page S4. April 2010

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2003

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 20, 2004

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 21, 2004

First Posted (Estimate)

January 22, 2004

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 5, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2011

Last Verified

August 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatitis

Clinical Trials on Telbivudine

3
Subscribe