Memantine and Comprehensive, Individualized Management of Alzheimer's Disease and Caregiver Training

September 15, 2016 updated by: NYU Langone Health

Memantine and Comprehensive, Individualized, Patient Centered Management of Alzheimer's Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a comprehensive, individualized management approach with caregiver training and medication with memantine will alleviate symptoms in community dwelling patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Presently some 4.5 million people are afflicted with Alzheimer's disease in the United States. At present pharmacologic treatment, although beneficial, is not curative. Certain nonpharmacologic treatments have assisted caregivers of AD patients by reducing their stress and burden, and others have aided patients, by improving their mood and physical functioning. Comprehensive, individualized approaches to improving Alzheimer's patients' symptomatology and caregiver stress and burden have not been systematically investigated in Alzheimer's patient care. This study seeks to train and counsel caregivers as well as develop an individualized, comprehensive management program that will seek to enhance the functioning of each patient participant.

Patients are randomly placed into one of two groups. Both groups receive memantine and comprehensive evaluations at baseline, 4, 12,28 and 52 weeks. Additionally, group 1 receives an individualized management program, which consists of home visits to get the patient exercising, doing enjoyable activities and cognitive stimulation, educational sessions for caregivers on coping with difficult situations and a caregiver support group to help with questions and emotional concerns.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • Fisher Alzheimer's Program, New York University School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients, 50 years of age or greater, residing in the community
  • Presence of a family and/or professional caregiver willing and able to participate in all aspects of this study
  • A diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's disease by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV) and NINCDS-ADRDA (McKhann,et al., Neurology,1984;34: 939-944) criteria
  • A CT or MRI brain scan and medical work up compatible with the DSM-IV and NINCDS-ADRDA diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease
  • Mini-Mental State Examination scores of 3-14
  • Global Deterioration Scale stages of 5 or 6
  • A stage of 6a or greater on the Functional Assessment Staging instrument signifying the presence of dementia deficits in the ability to perform one or more basic activities of daily living

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-English speaking patients and/or caregivers
  • Subjects with a diagnosis of dementia due to conditions other than Alzheimer's disease.
  • Subjects with a diagnosis of vascular dementia or a score greater than 4 on the modified Hachinski Ischemic Rating scale
  • Patients with a major depressive disorder
  • Patients with clinically significant laboratory abnormalities
  • Patients receiving investigational pharmacologic agents

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group 1
Individualized Management including caregiver training and Memantine
Individualized management program: consists of home visits to get the patient exercising, doing enjoyable activities and cognitive stimulation, educational sessions for caregivers on coping with difficult situations and a caregiver support group to help with questions and emotional concerns.
Other Names:
  • Exercise
  • Namenda
  • Activity therapy
  • Cognitive stimulation therapy
  • Caregiver support
  • Alzheimer's
  • Alzheimer's Disease
Patients receive 10 milligrams of memantine twice daily.
Other Names:
  • Namenda
Active Comparator: Group 2
Only Memantine
Patients receive 10 milligrams of memantine twice daily.
Other Names:
  • Namenda

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Clinician Interview-Based Assessment of Change Plus Caregiver Input (CIBIC-Plus) Global Score (New York Univeristy Version)
Time Frame: Baseline to 28 weeks
CIBIC-Plus is measured in units on a scale ranging from 1 to 7, where 1 is markedly improved, 4 is unchanged, and 7 is markedly worse
Baseline to 28 weeks
Change From Baseline in Clinician Interview-Based Assessment of Change Plus Caregiver Input (CIBIC-Plus) Global Score (New York Univeristy Version)
Time Frame: Baseline to 52 weeks
CIBIC-Plus is measured in units on a scale ranging from 1 to 7, where 1 is markedly improved, 4 is unchanged, and 7 is markedly worse
Baseline to 52 weeks
Change From Baseline of The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Activities of Daily Living Inventory Modified for Severe Dementia Abbreviated Version (ADCS-ADLsev-abv)
Time Frame: Baseline to 28 weeks
The ADCS-ADLsev-abv is a structured questionnaire where each item consists of a series of hierarchical questions designed to determine a patient's ability to perform the activities of daily living as assessed by the caregiver. Possible scores range from 0 to 39, where a higher score is indicative of greater capacities.
Baseline to 28 weeks
Change From Baseline of The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Activities of Daily Living Inventory Modified for Severe Dementia Abbreviated Version (ADCS-ADLsev-abv)
Time Frame: Baseline to 52 weeks
The ADCS-ADLsev-abv is a structured questionnaire where each item consists of a series of hierarchical questions designed to determine a patient's ability to perform the activities of daily living as assessed by the caregiver. Possible scores range from 0 to 39, where a higher score is indicative of greater capacities.
Baseline to 52 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline of the Severe Impairment Battery (SIB)
Time Frame: Baseline to 28 weeks
The SIB evaluates cognitive performance. It is a 51 item scale which assesses social interaction, memory, language, orientation, attention, praxis, visuospacial ability and construction. Scores range from 0 (greatest impairment) to 100 (least impairment).
Baseline to 28 weeks
Change From Baseline of the Severe Impairment Battery (SIB)
Time Frame: Baseline to 52 weeks
The SIB evaluates cognitive performance. It is a 51 item scale which assesses social interaction, memory, language, orientation, attention, praxis, visuospacial ability and construction. Scores range from 0 (greatest impairment) to 100 (least impairment).
Baseline to 52 weeks
Change From Baseline of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
Time Frame: Baseline to 28 weeks
The MMSE is a graded on a 30 point scale that measures cognitive functioning. A lower score indicates a higher level of impairment. Complete scale range is -no cognitive impairment=24-30; mild cognitive impairment=18-23; severe cognitive impairment=0-17.
Baseline to 28 weeks
Change From Baseline of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
Time Frame: Baseline to 52 weeks
The MMSE is a graded on a 30 point scale that measures cognitive functioning. A lower score indicates a higher level of impairment. Complete scale range is -no cognitive impairment=24-30; mild cognitive impairment=18-23; severe cognitive impairment=0-17.
Baseline to 52 weeks
Change From Baseline of the Functional Assessment Staging Disability Score (FAST-DS)
Time Frame: Baseline to 28 weeks

The FAST-DS assesses the magnitude of progressive functional deterioration by identifying characteristic progressive disabilities in participants with AD. Scores range from 1.0 (normal) to 7f (severe loss of ability, not even able to hold up head independently). Scores are made up of stages (1 through 7) and substages (from a to e for stage 6; from a to f for stage 7). The following scoring for substages is applied: 6a=6.0, 6b=6.2, 6c=6.4, 6d=6.6, 6e=6.8, 7a=7.0, 7b=7.2, 7c=7.4, 7d=7.6, 7e=7.8, 7f=8.0. Additionally, non-consecutive deficits are noted and scored as follows: full stage non-consecutive deficit=1.0, non-consecutive substage deficit=0.2.

The overall FAST-DS score = (FAST Stage Score) + (Each Non-Consecutive FAST disability scored as described)

Baseline to 28 weeks
Change From Baseline of the Functional Assessment Staging Disability Score (FAST-DS)
Time Frame: Baseline to 52 weeks

The FAST-DS assesses the magnitude of progressive functional deterioration by identifying characteristic progressive disabilities in participants with AD. Scores range from 1.0 (normal) to 7f (severe loss of ability, not even able to hold up head independently). Scores are made up of stages (1 through 7) and substages (from a to e for stage 6; from a to f for stage 7). The following scoring for substages is applied: 6a=6.0, 6b=6.2, 6c=6.4, 6d=6.6, 6e=6.8, 7a=7.0, 7b=7.2, 7c=7.4, 7d=7.6, 7e=7.8, 7f=8.0. Additionally, non-consecutive deficits are noted and scored as follows: full stage non-consecutive deficit=1.0, non-consecutive substage deficit=0.2.

The overall FAST-DS score = (FAST Stage Score) + (Each Non-Consecutive FAST disability scored as described)

Baseline to 52 weeks
Change From Baseline of The Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease Frequency Weighted Severity Scale (BEHAVE-AD-FW)
Time Frame: Baseline to 28 weeks
The BEHAVE-AD-FW measures the frequency and severity of 25 behavioral symptoms with a total score and global rating. Individual behavioral assessments are rated for severity (0=none to 3-most severe) and frequency (1=least frequent to 4=most frequent) which are then multiplied; scores for each of the 25 items are then summed. Possible total scores range from 0 to 297. The global rating is scored from 0 (not dangerous to patient, not troubling to caregiver) to 3 (dangerous to patient, highly troubling to caregiver). Global rating was not analyzed for this study. The higher the score the worse the outcome.
Baseline to 28 weeks
Change From Baseline of The Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease Frequency Weighted Severity Scale (BEHAVE-AD-FW)
Time Frame: Baseline to 52 weeks
The BEHAVE-AD-FW measures the frequency and severity of 25 behavioral symptoms with a total score and global rating. Individual behavioral assessments are rated for severity (0=none to 3-most severe) and frequency (1=least frequent to 4=most frequent) which are then multiplied; scores for each of the 25 items are then summed. Possible total scores range from 0 to 297. The global rating is scored from 0 (not dangerous to patient, not troubling to caregiver) to 3 (dangerous to patient, highly troubling to caregiver). The higher the score the worse the outcome.
Baseline to 52 weeks
Change From Baseline of the Revised Memory and Behavior Problems Checklist (RMBPC): Frequency
Time Frame: Baseline to 28 weeks
The RMBPC is a 24 item rating scale of the frequency of memory and behavioral problems in the AD subject and of how upset or "bothered" their caregivers react. Frequency is rated from 0 (least frequent) to 4 (most frequent) and caregiver reaction is rated from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely bothered or upset). Higher scores indicate more frequent memory and behavioral problems in the subject with AD as well as a more upset or bothered caregiver. Possible scores range from 0 to 96.
Baseline to 28 weeks
Change From Baseline of the Revised Memory and Behavior Problems Checklist (RMBPC): Caregiver Reaction
Time Frame: Baseline to 28 weeks
The RMBPC is a 24 item rating scale of the frequency of memory and behavioral problems in the AD subject and of how upset or "bothered" their caregivers react. Frequency is rated from 0 (least frequent) to 4 (most frequent) and caregiver reaction is rated from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely bothered or upset). Higher scores indicate more frequent memory and behavioral problems in the subject with AD as well as a more upset or bothered caregiver. Possible scores range from 0 to 96.
Baseline to 28 weeks
Change From Baseline of the Revised Memory and Behavior Problems Checklist (RMBPC): Frequency
Time Frame: Baseline to 52 weeks
The RMBPC is a 24 item rating scale of the frequency of memory and behavioral problems in the AD subject and of how upset or "bothered" their caregivers react. Frequency is rated from 0 (least frequent) to 4 (most frequent) and caregiver reaction is rated from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely bothered or upset). Higher scores indicate more frequent memory and behavioral problems in the subject with AD as well as a more upset or bothered caregiver. Possible scores range from 0 to 96.
Baseline to 52 weeks
Change From Baseline of the Revised Memory and Behavior Problems Checklist (RMBPC): Caregiver Reaction
Time Frame: Baseline to 52 weeks
The RMBPC is a 24 item rating scale of the frequency of memory and behavioral problems in the AD subject and of how upset or "bothered" their caregivers react. Frequency is rated from 0 (least frequent) to 4 (most frequent) and caregiver reaction is rated from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely bothered or upset). Higher scores indicate more frequent memory and behavioral problems in the subject with AD as well as a more upset or bothered caregiver. Possible scores range from 0 to 96.
Baseline to 52 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Barry Reisberg, M.D., NYU Langone Health
  • Study Director: Sunnie Kenowsky, D.V.M., NYU Langone Health

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 12, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

July 19, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 25, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2016

Last Verified

September 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alzheimer's Disease

Clinical Trials on Individualized management of AD including caregiver training

3
Subscribe