Telemedicine Treatment for Veterans With Gulf War Illness

June 2, 2017 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development
Effective treatments have been developed to ameliorate symptom-related distress and reduce unnecessary healthcare utilization using cognitive-behavioral techniques (CBT) . However there is a major limitation of this treatment is that patients must attend sessions in person. The specific aims of the study are to: (1) Determine the clinical efficacy of Telephone CBT for veterans with GWI who are frequent consumers of ambulatory medical care; (2) Determine whether CBT for veterans with GWI leads to a reduction in the cost of VA health care; and (3) Develop a statistical model of treatment seeking in veterans with GWI who are frequent consumers of ambulatory medical care.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

At least as far back as the American Civil War, soldiers have reported nonspecific ailments that could not be attributed to an underlying medical cause. The most frequent symptoms include persistent fatigue, palpitations, headache, muscle or joint pain, disturbed sleep, and cognitive difficulties. Recent epidemiologic studies suggest that war-related syndromes are exceptionally common in deployed personnel and may affect 45% to 60% of returning soldiers. These post-deployment symptoms have substantial consequences that include increased medical visitation, increased physical disability, and increased psychological distress. The number of veterans at risk is likely to increase rather than decrease in the years ahead. In order to address this anticipated increase, new and more efficient treatments for symptom-based illness are urgently needed to augment or replace standard VA care. An effective treatment using cognitive-behavioral techniques (CBT) has been developed to ameliorate symptom-related distress and reduce unnecessary healthcare utilization. Despite convincing evidence of therapeutic efficacy, a major limitation of this treatment is that patients must attend sessions in person. This requirement may undermine the effectiveness of CBT since fewer than half of those who need treatment will attend. A recent trial of CBT for veterans with Gulf War Illness found that only 38% were treatment adherent. Any sudden increase in the number of veterans seeking care could overwhelm the limited resources of a local VA healthcare center. The proposed study will address this important public health problem by testing a cost-effective and innovative strategy for delivering CBT over the phone.

The specific aims of the study are to: (1) Determine the clinical efficacy of Telephone CBT for veterans with GWI who are frequent consumers of ambulatory medical care; (2) Determine whether CBT for veterans with GWI leads to a reduction in the cost of VA health care; and (3) Develop a statistical model of treatment seeking in veterans with GWI who are frequent consumers of ambulatory medical care.

Participation is limited to veterans who satisfy a validated case definition of GWI and whose utilization is at (or above) the 80th percentile. A long-term goal of the proposed research is to make specialized Telephone CBT services widely available to veterans regardless of their geographic location. A previously validated CBT program for GWI has been adapted in consultation with Dr. Charles Engel. The proposed study represents the first randomized (multicenter) trial of Telephone CBT designed to ameliorate GWI and reduce unnecessary reliance on VA health care services. A total of 150 eligible veterans will be assigned to one of three groups: (I) Telephone CBT + Customary Medical Care; (II) In-Person CBT + Customary Medical Care; or (III) Customary Medical Care only.

Revised study procedures were developed and approved by our local IRB. CBT manual was refined and adapted for telephone use. Two postdoctoral fellows were recruited, trained in CBT, and study assessment techniques. A large pool of high utilizing veterans was identified. Of the first 1000 veteran names, 523 were not viable after chart review (outside catchment area; medical rule out; moved; deceased; etc); of 477 remaining 147 were not reachable; 102 declined; 46 were deemed ineligible after initial screening; 49 were eligible and scheduled for psychiatric interview. As of December 2006 a total of 116 veterans have been enrolled in the study and randomized to treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

128

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New Jersey
      • East Orange, New Jersey, United States, 07018
        • East Orange Campus of the VA New Jersey Health Care System, East Orange, NJ

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Top 20% of medical care utilizers;
  • Satisfies criteria for multisymptom illness;
  • Enrolled in the New Jersey VA Healthcare System for at least one year

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Psychotic disorders;
  • Dementia or other cognitive disorders;
  • Brain damage;
  • Anorexia/other eating disorders;
  • Pregnancy;
  • Heart failure;
  • Cancer;
  • Chronic renal insufficiency;
  • Severe hepatic disease;
  • Active Substance Abuse/Dependence

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Telemedicine treatment
Psychotherapy delivered by telephone
The investigators adapted two previously validated CBT manuals for use in both Telephone and In-Person groups (the "Personal Health Improvement Program" and Dr. Charles Engel's group treatment for GWI). Treatment included the following standard components of CBT: Didactic or educational material about the causes of GWI and an explanation of how thinking can cause stress ("ABC" model); Assessment of psychological distress and behavioral problems that may be targets of therapeutic intervention (e.g. symptom-related anxiety); Assessment of "thinking errors" that lead to psychological distress and trigger behavioral problems (e.g. catastrophizing); Cognitive restructuring to teach disputing skills or how to correct thinking errors; Cognitive and behavioral homework assignments (e.g. written self-disclosure); Didactic homework assignments (e.g. listen to previous treatment session).
This description is the same as the experimental treatment only disseminated in person rather than over the telephone.
Active Comparator: In-Person treatment
Psychotherapy delivered in-person
The investigators adapted two previously validated CBT manuals for use in both Telephone and In-Person groups (the "Personal Health Improvement Program" and Dr. Charles Engel's group treatment for GWI). Treatment included the following standard components of CBT: Didactic or educational material about the causes of GWI and an explanation of how thinking can cause stress ("ABC" model); Assessment of psychological distress and behavioral problems that may be targets of therapeutic intervention (e.g. symptom-related anxiety); Assessment of "thinking errors" that lead to psychological distress and trigger behavioral problems (e.g. catastrophizing); Cognitive restructuring to teach disputing skills or how to correct thinking errors; Cognitive and behavioral homework assignments (e.g. written self-disclosure); Didactic homework assignments (e.g. listen to previous treatment session).
This description is the same as the experimental treatment only disseminated in person rather than over the telephone.
No Intervention: Assessment only
No intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Frequency of medical visitation
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
quality of life
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mia M Downing, PhD, East Orange Campus of the VA New Jersey Health Care System, East Orange, NJ

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 22, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 9, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

August 11, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 6, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2017

Last Verified

June 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gulf War Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

3
Subscribe