Adapting Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) for Chinese Americans

February 7, 2013 updated by: Wei-Chin Hwang, Claremont McKenna College

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)

The goals of this study were to a) test whether cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is effective in treating depressed Chinese Americans, b) to develop and test the effectiveness of culturally adapt CBT, and c) to test the differential outcomes of the two treatments.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

It is now known that ethnic minorities are less likely to receive quality health services and evidence worse treatment outcomes when compared with other groups (IOM, 1999; USDHHS, 2001). Moreover, there continues to be a shortage of systematic investigations examining the efficacy of evidence-based treatments (EBTs) with ethnic minorities, especially among Chinese Americans. Developing interventions that are both empirically grounded and that are culturally sensitive and compatible with Chinese culture is one promising strategy that may improve treatment outcomes for this understudied group. The goal of this study is to culturally adapt a cognitive-behavioral therapy manual for use with depressed Chinese American patients. This study will be among the first to develop a culturally adapted EBT for use with this ethnic group and will involve three study phases. Phase I of the study will focus on modifying and refining a CBT intervention protocol into a manualized treatment for Chinese Americans. Phase two involves a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing the effects of the culturally adapted CBT treatment manual with nonadapted CBT. Phase three will involve further refinement of the treatment manual, data analysis, and report writing. Patients will be recruited from an ethnic-specific mental health center that specializes in treating Asian American clientele to participate in the study. Patients will be randomly assigned to either the adapted CBT treatment or the nonadapted CBT treatment. Moreover, feedback from patients and therapists in both conditions will be used to further refine the new treatment manual, provide valuable information about salient issues in treating depressed Chinese Americans, and will provide initial estimates of treatment parameters that will be used in preparing a larger R01 proposal to further test the adapted intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

61

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Claremont, California, United States, 91711
        • Claremont McKenna College

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • depression, Chinese American

Exclusion Criteria:

  • bipolar, psychotic disorder, primary substance abuse problem, severe medical conditions that induce depression

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Psychotherapy
Psychotherapy arm that consists of a randomization into 12 session manualized cognitive behavioral therapy or culturally adapted cognitive behavioral therapy for Chinese Americans.
cognitive behavioral therapy. 12 sessions.
culturally adapted cognitive behavioral therapy for Chinese Americans. 12 sessions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (Change is being assessed)
Time Frame: baseline, session 4, 8, 12, and three months follow-up
most commonly used depression rating scale
baseline, session 4, 8, 12, and three months follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Wei-Chin Hwang, PhD, Claremont McKenna College

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 5, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

February 8, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 8, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2013

Last Verified

February 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • R34MH073545 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Major Depression

Clinical Trials on cognitive behavioral therapy

3
Subscribe