Comparison of Two Protocols to Prevent the Acquisition of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus.

January 9, 2006 updated by: Rennes University Hospital

Evaluation of Two Protocols to Prevent the Acquisition of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus in Intensive Care Units.

Nosocomial infections is a major problem in intensive care units due to both growing incidence and pathogens implicated which become increasingly resistant to antibiotics. According to the Center for Disease Control (USA), Staphylococcus aureus is responsible for approximately 10% of cases. In Europe, 79% of the S.aureus strains are resistant to methicillin, a routinely used antibiotic. Recommendations for the prevention of transmission of these resistant bacteria are rarely based on controlled trials. Therefore the aim of our study is to evaluate two protocols to prevent the acquisition of methicillin-resistant S. Aureus in intensive care units: either a reinforced isolation precautions protocol or a standard precautions protocol.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Recommendations for the prevention of transmission of resistant bacteria in intensive care units (ICU) are rarely based on controlled trials. For this reason, we compared a reinforced isolation precautions protocol (RIPP) with a standard precautions protocol (SPP) for the acquisition of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in 2 intensive care units.

Evaluation: the risk for MRSA carriage was defined on admission if 1 of 3 criteria were met: hospitalization in the past year, transfer with prior length of stay ≥2 days, prior history of MRSA in the 5 past years.

Intervention: Randomization 1/1 of a total of 500 patients to either protocol; MRSA screening was performed at the sites of carriage and colonization at inclusion, every week and at ICU discharge in all patients; the results were given to the clinicians only for the patients of the RIPP group.

Protocols: the SPP was consistent with the CDC recommendations and included transmission-based isolation precautions to patients with clinical samples involving resistant bacteria (including MRSA) or highly transmissible organisms. The RIPP included the extension of isolation precautions (1) to patients at risk for MRSA on admission until screening results proved negative and (2) to MRSA-positive patients on screening or clinical samples until further negative samples, in whom nasal mupirocin decontamination was added. Compliance with the recommendations of each protocol was controlled by an audit.

The efficacy is assessed on the proportion of patients who acquired MRSA at any site.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment

500

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Rennes, France, 35033
        • Service de Maladies Infectieuses et Réanimation Médicale - Hôpital Pontchaillou
      • Tours, France, 37000
        • Service de Réanimation Médicale - Hôpital Bretonneau

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults over 18 years
  • Expected length of stay > 48h in intensive care unit
  • Informed written consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cerebral death
  • Care limitation
  • Neutropenia
  • Documented MRSA on admission
  • Patients receiving antistaphylococcal topical antibiotics on admission

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Proportion of patients who acquired MRSA at any site during their hospitalization in intensive care unit.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
- Rate of nosocomial MRSA infections
- Rate of nosocomial infections due to other pathogens
- Rate of nosocomial infections according to the site
- Death rate at the exit of intensive care unit
- Additional cost due to reinforced isolation protocol
- Antistaphylococcal antibiotics use in both protocols
- Number of days of antibiotherapy
- Time and cause of septic isolation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christophe CAMUS, MD, Rennes University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2002

Study Completion

February 1, 2004

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 8, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 8, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

September 9, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 10, 2006

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2006

Last Verified

January 1, 2006

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AFSSAPS 020551
  • PHRC/01-07
  • CIC0203/010

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nosocomial Infections

Clinical Trials on Reinforced isolation + Muciprocine

3
Subscribe