Surveillance of Bleeding Peptic Ulcer Using Wireless Capsule Endoscopy

September 11, 2005 updated by: Chinese University of Hong Kong

Phase 3 Study on the Use of Capsule Endoscope for Surveillance and Detection of Peptic Ulcer Rebleeding After Therapeutic Endoscopy

To investigate the adjunctive role of "Capsule Endoscope" in continuous endoscopic monitoring and early detection of recurrent ulcer bleeding after endoscopic therapy in patients presenting with bleeding peptic ulcers

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background

Acute gastrointestinal bleeding is a common medical emergency worldwide. In Hong Kong it accounts for about 5% of all admissions through the Accident and Emergency Department1. The most common cause is bleeding from a peptic ulcer.

Ulcers bleed when an artery at the base of the ulcer is eroded, Bleeding from such an eroded artery may be intermittent, as the artery may be plugged by a thrombus. Dislodgement of the clot results in rebleeding. Rebleeding has long been recognized as one of the worse prognosticators for ulcer bleeding and is associated with a 6-10 fold increase in mortality. Rebleeding is associated with a major bleed manifested by hematemesis and hypotension, indicating that a large size vessel has been eroded. Such vessels, and the clot plugging them, may be visible endoscopically and have been named "stigmata of recent haemorrhage". Such stigmata are associated with a higher risk of rebleeding. High-risk stigmata, such as active bleeding, a protuberant "visible vessel", or an adherent clot, are now used to select patients who are liable to rebleed for endoscopic therapy. In recent years, with advances in endoscopic technology and expertise, therapeutic endoscopy has taken over as the first line therapy for bleeding5. Techniques such as injection therapy, thermal coagulation and clip application have been shown to be highly effective in controlling bleeding7.

Rebleeding after endoscopic therapy

Rebleeding is the most important prognostic factor in patients with ulcer haemorrhage. It carries a 10-fold increase in mortality. Rebleeding can be predicted by hematemesis and shock on admission. Before the era of therapeutic endoscopy traditional dogma recommends early surgery to preempt another catastrophic bleed in these patients. With the advent of effective endoscopic haemostasis the place of early surgery is less clear. Indeed a trial at our center indicates that repeat endoscopic therapy can salvage 75% of rebleeding patients without compromising patient safety10.

Scheduled repeat endoscopy at 24 hour intervals have been used to detect and retreat any remaining stigmata11. Such a policy also subjects many patients to unnecessary endoscopy and treatment but has not been shown to improve outcome. Re-endoscopy at 24-hour intervals misses rebleeding that occurs in the interim, but repeated endoscopy at closer intervals is impractical. Some authors has suggested combining clinical endoscopic data in a scoring system to select patients for repeat endoscopic re-treatment, and demonstrated improved outcome in a small series. Others have used Doppler signals in arteries in the ulcer base to predict failures of endoscopic treatment.

Recognition of rebleeding - Use of wireless endoscopy

Clinical rebleeding is usually defined as vomiting of red blood, hemodynamic instability or drop in the hemoglobin level after initial stabilization. These clinical features appear only after a significant amount of blood has been lost. There is, at present, no reliable method of detecting rebleeding in a timely fashion. If there is a reliable early warning system, analogous to ECG monitoring for arrhythmia in patients who has had a myocardial infarction, we may be able to intervene in time to preempt the harmful effects of further major blood loss in a patient who has already bled from the ulcer.

Endoscopy using a pill sized (11mm x 26mm, weight ~ 4 grams) capsule endoscope was first reported by Iddan. The capsule can be swallowed and transmit images from various part of the gastrointestinal tract as the capsule traverses the gastrointestinal tract. The main indication at present is the visualization of the small intestine, especially for locating sources of bleeding that are beyond the range of gastroscopy and colonoscopy. The battery of the capsule lasts for up to 8 hours.

We aimed to use the capsule endoscope to monitor the bleeding peptic ulcer after therapeutic endoscopy in order to detect rebleeding before clinical manifestation.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment

50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, China
        • Recruiting
        • Endoscopy Center, Prince of Wales Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Philip WY Chiu, MBChB, FRCSEd

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with bleeding peptic ulcers; ulcer actively bleeding or with major stigmata of visible vessels ( protuberant discolorations in ulcer bases) and clots (Forrest I, IIa and IIb ulcers) seen at endoscopy performed within 24 hours of their admissions.
  • Endoscopic hemostasis achieved (with defined endpoints).
  • Age > 18
  • Provision of an informed written consent signed by the patient.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The present of an intercurrent ulcer complication precluding endoscopic treatment such as gastric outlet obstruction or ulcer perforation mandating surgical intervention.
  • Patients with clinical suspicion of intestinal obstruction, stricture and fistula.
  • Patient with cardiac pacemaker, or any implanted electromedical device.
  • Age <18
  • Pregnancy
  • moribund patients e.g. patients with terminal malignancy
  • Patient unable to give written consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Defined Population
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Enders KW Ng, MD, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2003

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 11, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

September 14, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 14, 2005

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2005

Last Verified

September 1, 2005

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bleeding Peptic Ulcer

Clinical Trials on Endoscopic placement of Capsule endoscope adjacent to the peptic ulcer

3
Subscribe