Effects of IAS in Men With Localized Biochemical Relapsed Prostate Cancer (IAS)

August 3, 2018 updated by: Celestia Higano, University of Washington

A Prospective Study of Intermittent Androgen Suppression (IAS) in Men With Localized Prostate Cancer Who Have Biochemical Relapse After Radiation Therapy or Radical Prostatectomy

This study was a prospective analysis in men with localized prostate cancer who had rising Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) levels after definitive treatment with surgery or radiation. Patients received Intermittent Androgen Suppression (IAS) in 9 month cycles until they became metastatic, became castrate resistant, or withdrew from the study. Subjects were monitored for time to development of Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC) and overall survival. They were also monitored for the impact of IAS on a variety of neuro-psychiatric assessments and on bone density.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The standard first line treatment for men with early stage newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer is a surgical removal of the prostate, localized external beam radiation, brachytherapy, or a combination of surgery and radiation. In most patients Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) levels will decline after these localized treatments, demonstrating a response to these therapies. However despite an initial response to localized treatment, some men will go on to later develop a rise in PSA levels, an indicator of Biochemical Relapsed Prostate Cancer (BRPC). For BRPC patients who have not yet developed metastasis, the standard treatment is Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) to decrease levels of Testosterone, subsequently decreasing PSA levels. A low value for the PSA is more desirable as it may indicate no tumor growth.

ADT may be administered as a continuous treatment (Continuous Androgen Suppression, or CAS) or as intermittent treatment (Intermittent Androgen Suppression, or IAS). This treatment is continued until the development of Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC), indicated by a rise in PSA despite ADT. Giving the hormone therapy intermittently (in cycles of treatment and off treatment periods) appears to delay the change of prostate cancer to a type of prostate cancer that resists hormone therapy, prolonging efficacy of ADT monotherapy. IAS may also decrease the impact of ADT on mental status.

This study evaluated the effect of intermittent androgen suppression on time to androgen independent progression (the development of castration resistant disease) and overall survival in men with localized prostate cancer. Subjects were also evaluated for the effects of intermittent androgen suppression on a variety of neuro-psychiatric assessments and on bone density.

The subjects in this study had a rising PSA value after definitive therapy either with radical prostatectomy or external beam irradiation for the treatment of prostate cancer. All subjects were males at or over the age of 21 years.

New subjects were introduced to this study protocol (along with other non-study treatment options) during a clinic visit with Dr. Higano or another sub-investigator. After informed consent was obtained, subjects underwent the following screening procedures before starting treatment: Bone density scan (DEXA), Technetium-99 bone scan, CT scan of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis, blood draw, and neuro-psychiatric assessments. Subjects then began androgen suppression with a two-week lead-in of Flutamide, followed by 9 monthly injections of Leuprolide Acetate. During the treatment, they had quarterly clinic visits and blood draws. Their PSA levels were monitored monthly, and if their PSA reached the appropriate nadir at by month 9, the androgen suppression was interrupted. At the end of each treatment cycle, subjects underwent another bone density test, blood draw, problem solving test, and neuro-psychiatric assessments.

During the "off treatment" phase, the subject will again had quarterly clinic visits, blood draws, and neuro-psychiatric assessments. PSA and testosterone were be monitored monthly. Once the PSA reached the appropriate threshold, the subject performed another set of screening procedures and resumed treatment for another 9 months. This cycle continued until the patient withdrew from the study, was taken off the study due to toxicities or the decision of the investigator, or until the treatment with IAS was no longer effective in controlling the prostate cancer. The neuro-psychiatric assessments were only performed during the subject's first cycle of treatment (consisting of the 9 months on treatment, and at month 3 of the off treatment period afterwards).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

102

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98109
        • Seattle Cancer Care Alliance

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Biochemical relapse (rising PSA) after initial treatment (radiation therapy, brachytherapy, or radical prostatectomy) for histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate
  • Clinical stage A2, B, C, D1
  • Age: older than 21 years old
  • Performance status of 0 or 1
  • Pretreatment serum testosterone, normal range (or no clinical evidence of testosterone deficiency).
  • If less than 30 months since completion of radiation therapy, biopsy of prostate suggested within 6 months of study entry. If more than or equal to 30 months since completion of radiation therapy, biopsy of prostate suggested within 1 year.
  • Written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Abnormal bone scan suggestive of metastatic osseous disease.
  • Previous hormonal manipulation including orchiectomy or any medication with significant antiandrogenic activity (combined androgen suppression over 9 months, monotherapy antiandrogens, estrogens, ketoconazole). *Neoadjuvant androgen suppression therapy of less than or equal to 3 months is allowed, if this androgen suppression therapy was completed more than or equal to 1 year prior to study enrollment AND if the Testosterone level is within the normal ranges.
  • Any systemic chemotherapy or curative radiotherapy within 6 months.
  • Hepatic dysfunction:

    • Total bilirubin greater than 2.0 mg/dl
    • Aspartate transaminase (AST; SGOT) greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal range
    • Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal range).
  • Renal dysfunction:

    • Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) greater than 40 mg/dl
    • Serum Creatinine greater than 2.0 mg/dl.
  • History or presence of other malignancy within the last 5 years (except treated squamous/basal cell carcinoma of the skin or superficial bladder carcinoma).
  • Hypersensitivity to flutamide or leuprolide.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Intermittent Androgen Suppression (IAS)

Intermittent Androgen Suppression in 9 month cycles with a combination of a two-week lead-in of Flutamide, followed by 9 monthly injections of Leuprolide Acetate.

Flutamide dosed as 250mg orally three times a day for 14 days prior to the initiation of Leuprolide Acetate.

Leuprolide Acetate dosed as 7.5mg intramuscular (IM) injections once per month for a total of 9 months.

Flutamide dosed at 250mg orally three times a day for 14 days prior to the initiation of Leuprolide Acetate.
Other Names:
  • Eulexin
Leuprolide Acetate dosed at 7.5mg intramuscular (IM) injections once per month for a total of 9 months.
Other Names:
  • Lupron
  • Lupron Depot
  • Eligard

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Androgen Independence of Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)
Time Frame: From date of first treatment until the date of development of CR, metastatic progression, or study withdrawal, whichever came first, assessed up to 16 years.
Monthly Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) testing to assess the point at which each patient's disease stops responding to Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT). Androgen Independence (AI), also know as Castrate Resistance (CR), was defined as 2 serial rises in PSA while on ADT with Testosterone levels <50 ng/dL.
From date of first treatment until the date of development of CR, metastatic progression, or study withdrawal, whichever came first, assessed up to 16 years.
Effect of IAS on Overall Survival.
Time Frame: From date of first treatment until the date of death or study withdrawal, whichever came first, assessed up to 16 years.
Assessment of overall survival measured as median time from completion of first full cycle of IAS until date of death from any cause.
From date of first treatment until the date of death or study withdrawal, whichever came first, assessed up to 16 years.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Standardized Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of the Spine During IAS
Time Frame: From screening prior to first dose of ADT through the start of the second cycle of ADT.
Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans were performed prior to first cycle of ADT, after completion of the first cycle of ADT, and prior to the start of the second cycle of ADT. Bone Mineral Density (BMD) was a assessed in g/cm^2 as a indicator of bone health for each patient at each time point.
From screening prior to first dose of ADT through the start of the second cycle of ADT.
Change in Standardized Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of the Left Hip During IAS
Time Frame: From screening prior to first dose of ADT through the start of the second cycle of ADT.
Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans were performed prior to first cycle of ADT, after completion of the first cycle of ADT, and prior to the start of the second cycle of ADT. Bone Mineral Density (BMD) was a assessed in g/cm^2 as a indicator of bone health. Percent change was assess for each patient at each time point.
From screening prior to first dose of ADT through the start of the second cycle of ADT.
Development of Osteopenia (Bone Loss) During IAS
Time Frame: From screening prior to first dose of ADT through the start of the second cycle of ADT.
Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans were performed prior to first cycle of ADT, after completion of the first cycle of ADT, and prior to the start of the second cycle of ADT. Bone Mineral Density (BMD) was a assessed in g/cm^2 as a indicator of bone health for each patient at each time point. This measure was defined as the percentage of participants with normal BMD scores at baseline who developed Osteopenia after the first cycle of ADT.
From screening prior to first dose of ADT through the start of the second cycle of ADT.
Testosterone Levels During IAS
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12
Testosterone was measured at baseline, and at Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12 after the start of the first cycle of ADT.
Baseline, Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12
Estradiol Levels During First Cycle of IAS
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12
Estradiol was measured at baseline, and at Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12 after the start of the first cycle of ADT.
Baseline, Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12
Score on Spatial Ability Test (Block Design) During First Cycle of IAS
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12
Spatial Ability was assessed at baseline, and at Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12 after the start of the first cycle of ADT. This assessment was based on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised, Block Design sub-test and measures participants' ability to analyze and construct abstract figures from their component parts. The test allows a time limit of 3 minutes per design, for a total of nine designs. Score is based on total number of designs completed (max 9, min 0).
Baseline, Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12
Score on Spatial Ability Test (Mental Rotation) During First Cycle of IAS
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12
Spatial Ability (Mental Rotation) was assessed at baseline, and at Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12 after the start of the first cycle of ADT. This assessment was based on the Vandenberg & Kuse (1978) Mental Rotation Test. Subjects are presented with line drawings of complex, three dimensional cubes on a computer screen. The subject must compare the two drawings and decide if they match. Score is based on number of correctly identified figures.
Baseline, Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12
Score on Executive Function Testing (Stroop Task) During First Cycle of IAS
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12
Executive Function was assessed at baseline, and at Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12 after the start of the first cycle of ADT. This assessment was based on the Stroop Color Word Interference Task. Subjects are asked to read 100 color words (red, green, blue), followed by identification of color blocks followed by reading the color of the ink and ignoring the word (e.g., the word 'blue' printed in green letters). Assessment was based on the amount of time needed to time to complete the assessment.
Baseline, Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12
Score on Verbal Memory Testing (Proactive Interference) During First Cycle of IAS
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12
Verbal Memory was assessed at baseline, and at Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12 after the start of the first cycle of ADT via the Proactive Interference (PI) task. The PI task involves participants listening to a list of 10 words from the same semantic category (e.g., articles of clothing), and then recalling as many of these words as possible.The procedure is repeated for a total of 4 trials. Assessment is based on the total number of words recalled.
Baseline, Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12
Score on Visual Working Memory Test During First Cycle of IAS
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12
Visual Working Memory was assessed at baseline, and at Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12 after the start of the first cycle of ADT. This task is based on the Subject Ordered Pointing Task (SOPT). The participant is shown a grid array of 10, 12 or 16 abstract designs and they must choose a new design with each refresh of the screen. Assessment is based on total number of errors.
Baseline, Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12
Score on Verbal Memory Testing (Story Recall) During First Cycle of IAS
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12
Verbal Memory was assessed at baseline, and at Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12 after the start of the first cycle of ADT via Story Recall. This task is based on the well known Wechsler Memory Scale -Revised Logical Memory task. Participants listened to two brief narratives (stories) and were asked to recall as much as possible immediately after hearing each story and following a 20-minute delay. Assessment was based on number of correctly recalled pieces of information after a delay.
Baseline, Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12
Score on Spatial Memory Testing During First Cycle of IAS
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12
Spatial Memory was assessed at baseline, and at Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12 after the start of the first cycle of ADT using the Puget Sound Route Learning Test. This test measured the ability to navigate a short route within a room. Three trials were administered followed by three trials of a new route using pictures placed on the floor as landmarks. A delayed recall is administered after twenty minutes. Performance was assessed based on number of correctly recalled sequences after a delay.
Baseline, Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12
Score on Verbal Ability/Fluency Testing During First Cycle of IAS
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12
Verbal Ability/Fluency was assessed at baseline, and at Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12 after the start of the first cycle of ADT. Participants were asked to verbally generate as many words beginning with a particular letter (e.g. P) within a 60 second period. Two trials were administered with two different letters. The total number of words generated was recorded for each letter and summed and analyzed.
Baseline, Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 8, 1997

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 6, 2012

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

September 6, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 16, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2005

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 22, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 7, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trials on Flutamide

3
Subscribe