Programmable Timer in the Bladder Rehabilitation Treatment of OAB

June 13, 2008 updated by: University of Aarhus

The Effect of Programmable Timer in Bladder Rehabilitation Treatment of Idiopathic Overactive Bladder in Children

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of bladder rehabilitation in a non-selected group of children with idiopathic overactive bladder and to clarify whether the effect of the treatment can be increased by addition of a programmable timer

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Daytime urinary incontinence is common in children. At the age of 7 a prevalence of 2-9 % has been reported. Daytime urinary incontinence is a heterogenic multifactorial illness where the the symptoms has several degrees of severity and can be caused by different mechanisms. Daytime urinary incontinence can be etiologically classified in the rare neurogenic and structural forms and the common functional or idiopathic form (where no neurological or structural cause of the bladder dysfunction can be identified.

The symptom based diagnosis OAB (overactive bladder) is most often used to describe daytime urinary incontinence in children. OAB is defined as a symptom syndrome including urgency with or without urge incontinence in combination with frequency.

When urinary tract infection and neurogenic and structural causes has been excluded the nonpharmacological bladder rehabilitation is first line treatment in children with OAB. It is expected that approximately 50 % of the children can be relieved of symptoms by this treatment. The treatment consist of instruction in good micturition habits including toilet position, sufficient fluid intake and voidings at predefined intervals. The treatment effect is to a large degree dependent upon the ability of the children to void at fixed intervals. Children at the age of 5-10 yrs generally find this difficult and a programmable timer seems be an useful instrument in order to remind the child of voiding at fixed times. However there has not been published studies of the effect of programmable timer.

Hypothesis:

  • Daytime urinary incontinence in children aged 5-15 with idiophatic OAB can in 50 % of cases be cured by bladder rehabilitation
  • The compliance of the bladder rehabilitation treatment can for each individual be increased by adding a programmable timer to the treatment.

Material and methods:

100 children with idiopathic OAB will be recruited from the Center of Child Incontinence, Skejby University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

After a run-in period of at least 4 weeks the children will be randomized to 12 weeks of bladder rehabilitation with or without programmable timer.

The effect of the treatment will be estimated based on home recordings.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Aarhus N
      • Aarhus, Aarhus N, Denmark, 8200
        • Department of pediatrics, University hospital of Aarhus, Skejby Sygehus

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years to 15 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Daytime urinary incontinence with at least 1 episode of at least 1 ml per week
  • More than 6 voidings per day
  • Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known diseases of the kidneys or urinary tract besides OAB
  • Receiving treatment with drugs that have an effect on the urine production or bladder function

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Clinical effects evaluated by home registrations of incontinence episodes and frequency volume charts at specified intervals.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Bladder capacity measure before and after treatment.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Soeren Hagstroem, MD, University of Aarhus

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2006

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 12, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

October 13, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 17, 2008

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2008

Last Verified

June 1, 2008

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Overactive Bladder

Clinical Trials on Bladder rehabilitation

Subscribe