Home Care Management of Pediatric Pain

June 7, 2012 updated by: Kimberly A. Sutters, University of California, San Francisco
The purpose of this study is to determine whether around-the-clock dosing of pain medication, with or without nurse coaching, increases the effectiveness of pain management (i.e., decreased pain intensity scores with and without swallowing, increased use of pain medication, improved sleep, increased oral intake of fluids, decreased negative behaviors, and the same degree of side effects), over time, compared to standard care with "as needed" dosing.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The undertreatment of postoperative pain in children remains a critical problem. Only recently have clinical trials begun to evaluate the efficacy of pharmacologic interventions in the management of postoperative pain beyond the immediate postoperative recovery period and after discharge home following tonsillectomy. Given the fact that approximately 50% of pediatric surgeries are done on an outpatient basis, this study has the potential to improve the home pain management of thousands of children. This study is one of the first to evaluate in a systematic fashion the use of an around-the-clock dosing of a weight appropriate dose of a nonopioid/opioid combination analgesic compared to as needed dosing. Because the study will evaluate the effectiveness of both a behavioral intervention and two different pharmacologic interventions, it will provide important information that should have a direct clinical application in the management of children's pain.

The consent form is written according to the standards outlined by the Committee on Human Research, including: 1) an explanation of the purposes of the research and the expected duration of the subject's participation; 2) a description of the procedures to be followed; 3) a description of any foreseeable risks or benefits to the subject, and any alternative courses of treatment; 4) a statement describing the extent to which confidentiality of records will be maintained; 5) a statement whether compensation will be provided and medical treatment made available if injury occurs; 6) the name and number of the Chair of the Committee on Human Research; 7) a statement that participation is voluntary, and that the subject may discontinue participation at any time; and 8) a statement indicating that the subject has received a copy of the consent document and related materials. A separate form is signed to authorize access to their health care information.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

211

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Madera, California, United States, 93638-8762
        • Children's Hospital Central California

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years to 15 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Outpatient tonsillectomy, with or without other minor procedures (e.g., ear tube placement); parental consent; child assent (age-appropriate); ability of the child to speak English; ability of the parents to read, write, and speak English; and, access to a telephone.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of severe obstructive sleep apnea (causing the child to stop breathing repeatedly during sleep); known problems with vision, hearing, control and coordination of movement, or thinking ability.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group B
standard care
ATC dosing of a weight-appropriate dose of a nonopioid/opioid combination analgesic, every 4 hours around-the-clock for the first 3 days following surgery
Experimental: Group C
ATC dosing of a weight-appropriate dose of a nonopioid/opioid combination analgesic, every 4 hours around-the-clock for the first 3 days following surgery
The structured pain management program consisted of a nurse coaching intervention which included an evaluation of the child's current condition, review of the pain intensity scores, verification that the child was taking the pain medication, re-education regarding the rationale for ATC dosing, review of strategies to facilitate medication administration, and re-education about potential side effects associated with analgesic administration.
Active Comparator: Group A
standard care
"As needed" analgesic dosing with a weight-appropriate dose of a nonopioid/opioid combination analgesic, every 4 hours as needed for pain.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Determine the effectiveness of pain management "over time", compared to standard care with "as needed" dosing.
Time Frame: Morning and evening for 3 days following surgery
Morning and evening for 3 days following surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Pain intensity
Time Frame: Morning and evening for 3 days following surgery
Morning and evening for 3 days following surgery
Severity of opioid-related adverse effects (i.e., nausea, vomiting, constipation, daytime sedation, lightheadedness or feeling dizzy, and nightmares)
Time Frame: Every evening for 3 days following surgery
Every evening for 3 days following surgery
Volume and number of times pain medication administered
Time Frame: with each dose for 3 days following surgery
with each dose for 3 days following surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kimberly A Sutters, RN, PhD, Children's Hospital Central California

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2000

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 8, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

November 10, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 8, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2012

Last Verified

June 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CHR #H7097-14918-13
  • R01NR004826 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tonsillectomy

Clinical Trials on Standard Care

3
Subscribe