Tamoxifen or Letrozole in Treating Women With Ductal Carcinoma in Situ

November 10, 2020 updated by: University of California, San Francisco

Primary Hormonal Therapy for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Exploration of a Novel Approach to the Clinical Management of Noninvasive Breast Cancer

RATIONALE: Estrogen can cause the growth of breast cancer cells. Hormone therapy using tamoxifen or letrozole may fight breast cancer by blocking the use of estrogen by the tumor cells or by lowering the amount of estrogen the body makes.

PURPOSE: This clinical trial is studying how well tamoxifen or letrozole work in treating women with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

OBJECTIVES:

  • Determine the clinical response in women with estrogen receptor-positive ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) treated with neoadjuvant hormonal therapy comprising tamoxifen or letrozole, by evaluating the maximal change in tumor diameter on mammography and MRI following treatment.
  • Identify those cellular antigens which are altered by hormonal therapy.
  • Determine which cellular antigens are predictive of clinical response to hormonal therapy.
  • Evaluate whether genomic changes or gene expression in DCIS are altered by hormonal therapy and find candidate genes which are correlated with response to treatment.

OUTLINE: This is a pilot study.

Patients who are premenopausal receive oral tamoxifen once daily for 3 months in the absence of unacceptable toxicity. Patients who are post menopausal receive oral letrozole once daily for 3 months in the absence of unacceptable toxicity.

After 3 months of hormonal therapy, patients undergo lumpectomy or mastectomy.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed every 6 months for 5 years and then annually thereafter.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 40 patients will be accrued for this study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

79

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94143
        • University of California, San Francisco

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) on core biopsy
  • No evidence of contralateral breast disease or palpable masses on breast examination
  • No presence or suspicion of invasive cancer, including contralateral invasive cancer, on core biopsy and MRI
  • No documented ipsilateral axillary adenopathy
  • Planning to undergo lumpectomy or mastectomy
  • Estrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumor by immunohistochemistry

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Female patient
  • Premenopausal or postmenopausal

    • Postmenopausal is defined by any of the following:

      • No spontaneous menses for >= 1 year
      • Bilateral oophorectomy
      • Radiation castration and amenorrheic for >= 3 months
      • Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) > 20 IU/L AND off all hormonal therapy (e.g., hormone replacement therapy or birth control pills) for >= 1 month
  • Not pregnant or nursing
  • Negative pregnancy test
  • Fertile patients must use effective contraception
  • No co-morbidities contraindicating the use of tamoxifen, including any of the following:

    • Prior history of thrombotic events
    • History of hypercoagulable state
    • History of endometrial hyperplasia
    • Abnormal vaginal bleeding
  • No history of contrast dye-related allergies/reactions
  • No history of metal-containing prostheses or implants

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

  • See Disease Characteristics

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: tamoxifen or letrozole
tamoxifen or letrozole work in treating women with ductal carcinoma in situ

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Median Change in 6-month Tumor Volume Compared to Baseline Using Mammography
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
Change in size of Ductal Carcinoma in situ (DCIS) for participants on hormonal therapy, as determined by mammography are determined by (1) largest diameter of tumor, as visualized on mammography (2) extent of disease on mammography (3) quantification of mammographically-detected change from baseline to 6-month and used to generate the change in tumor volume of mammographic extent of disease from baseline. Since values were not normally distributed, the median change was calculated, and Wilcoxon sign rank tests were used to evaluate the significance of these changes
Baseline and 6 months
Median Change in 6-month Tumor Volume Compared to Baseline Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
Change in size of Ductal Carcinoma in situ (DCIS) on hormonal therapy, as determined by MRI are determined by (1) largest diameter of tumor, as visualized on MRI (2) extent of disease on MRI (3) quantification of MR-detected change from baseline to 6-month and used to generate the change in tumor volume of MRI extent of disease from baseline. Since values were not normally distributed, the median change was calculated, and Wilcoxon sign rank tests were used to evaluate the significance of these changes.
Baseline and 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Responders to Neoadjuvant Therapy at Month 3
Time Frame: 3 months
MRI volume response at each time point was classified as follows: 90% image-complete response (ICR90) is defined as a >90% reduction in tumor volume, 80% image-complete response (ICR80) is defined as an 81-90% reduction in tumor volume , partial response (PR) is defined as a 20-80% reduction in tumor volume, and sustained disease or progressive disease (SD/PD) defined as a <20% reduction or increase in volume.
3 months
Number of Responders to Neoadjuvant Therapy at Month 6
Time Frame: 6 months
MRI volume response at each time point was classified as follows: 90% image-complete response (ICR90) is defined as a >90% reduction in tumor volume, 80% image-complete response (ICR80) is defined as an 81-90% reduction in tumor volume , partial response (PR) is defined as a 20-80% reduction in tumor volume, and sustained disease or progressive disease (SD/PD) defined as a <20% reduction or increase in volume.
6 months
Median Reduction in Tumor Volume by Estrogen Receptor Hormone (ER H-) Quartile Group
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
Tumor volume changes between baseline and surgery were calculated at month 6 and compared across baseline ER Hormone (H-) Score quartile. The ER H- scores are a percentage that tells you how many cells out of 100 stain positive for hormone receptors. Each participant is assigned an ER H- score at baseline with the full score range between 0 (none have receptors) and 100 (all have receptors). The participants were grouped into quartiles (four equal groups) based on their baseline ER H- score. ER H- score and the reduction in tumor volume from baseline to month 6 was measured for each quartile group.
Baseline and 6 months
Median Reduction in Tumor Volume by PgR H-score by Quartile Group
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months

Tumor volume changes between baseline and surgery were calculated at month 6 and compared across baseline PgR Hormone (H-) Score quartile. The PgR H-scores are a percentage that tells you how many cells out of 100 stain positive for hormone receptors. Each participant is assigned a PgR H- score at baseline with the full PgR H score ranges between 0 (none have receptors) and 100 (all have receptors). The participants were grouped into quartiles (four equal groups) based on their baseline PgR H- score and the reduction in tumor volume from baseline to month 6 was measured for each quartile group.

A wilcoxon sign rank tests were used to evaluate the significance of these changes

Baseline and 6 months
Median Reduction in Tumor Volume by Ki-67 Average Score
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
Tumor volume changes between baseline and surgery were calculated at month 6 by Baseline Ki-67 Average Score which is divided into 2 groups: (1) <=10% or (2) >10% to 100%. In est results, the Ki-67 findings expressed as a percentage with less than 10% considered low Ki-67 expression and > than 10% or higher considered high. A "high" score means that the breast tumor is more likely to be aggressive and spread quickly. A wilcoxon sign rank tests were used to evaluate the significance of these changes
Baseline and 6 months
Correlation Between Pathologic Tumor Size at Radiographic (MRI) Tumor Size
Time Frame: 6 months
Correlations between pathologic tumor size and maximum diameters of baseline and 6-month MRI extent of disease were evaluated using Spearman correlation coefficient measure of association. The Spearman's rank-order correlation (rs) measures the strength and direction of association between two variables. The Spearman correlation coefficient, rs, can take values from +1 to -1 where a value of +1 indicates a perfect association, an rs of 0 indicates no association and an rs of -1 indicates a perfect negative association. The closer rs is to 0, the weaker the association.
6 months
Correlation Between Pathologic Tumor Size and Mammographic Tumor Size
Time Frame: 6 months
Correlations between pathologic tumor size and maximum diameters of baseline and pre-surgical mammographic extent of disease were evaluated using Spearman correlation coefficient measure of association. The Spearman's rank-order correlation (rs) measures the strength and direction of association between two variables. The Spearman correlation coefficient, rs, can take values from +1 to -1 where a value of +1 indicates a perfect association, an rs of 0 indicates no association and an rs of -1 indicates a perfect negative association. The closer rs is to 0, the weaker the association.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: E. Shelley Hwang, MD, MPH, University of California, San Francisco
  • Principal Investigator: Frederic M. Waldman, MD, PhD, University of California, San Francisco
  • Principal Investigator: Rita Mukhtar, MD, University of California, San Francisco

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 19, 2002

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 9, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

February 13, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 4, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on neoadjuvant therapy

3
Subscribe