Comparison of Intraspinal Nerve Root Stimulation With Dorsal Column Stimulation

September 4, 2008 updated by: Boston Scientific Corporation

Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain With Spinal Cord Stimulation: Comparison of Subthreshold Intraspinal Nerve Root Stimulation With Subthreshold and Suprathreshold Dorsal Column Stimulation and a Secondary Study of the Effect of Pulse Width

This study will systematically evaluate the programming parameters of the Precision Spinal Cord Stimulation Device to optimally relieve pain while minimizing any uncomfortable side effects.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study will investigate the efficacy of subthreshold intraspinal nerve root stimulation (INRS) in treating back pain. The efficacy of this strategy will be tested against dorsal column stimulation (DCS), the commonly-accepted technique for spinal cord stimulation. DCS will be tested at subthreshold and suprathreshold (perceptible) amplitudes. A substudy will involve patients who prefer suprathreshold DCS over INRS and subthreshold DCS. Its purpose is to systematically assess the pain relief afforded by a number of programs with different pulse widths. The overall purpose of this study is to investigate methods of making pain relief via electrical stimulation more comfortable by either using subthreshold amplitudes or by adjusting the pulse width of perceptible stimulation to a more pleasing range.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

4

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Daphne, Alabama, United States, 36526
        • Comprehensive Pain & Rehabilitation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Have chronic low back pain following spine surgery (Failed Back Surgery Syndrome.
  • Be an appropriate candidate for Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) and for the surgical procedures required for SCS.
  • Have experienced significant though short-lived pain relief with local anesthetic injection.
  • Be 18 years of age or older.
  • Be willing and able to comply with all study related procedures and visits.
  • Be capable of reading and understanding patient information materials and giving written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have any significant medical condition that is likely to interfere with study procedures.
  • Have any evidence of neurologic instability.
  • Have any other chronic pain condition.
  • Have a condition currently requiring or likely to require the use of MRI or diathermy.
  • Have an active implantable device.
  • Are pregnant or planning to become pregnant in the next year.
  • Are a current substance abuser (including alcohol and illicit drugs).
  • Have a significant psychiatric disorder.
  • Have participated in any drug or device trial in the last 4 weeks or plan to participate in any other trial during the duration of this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The primary objective of this study is to compare subthreshold intraspinal nerve root stimulation (INRS) with subthreshold and suprathreshold dorsal column stimulation (DCS).
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
The primary safety endpoint is incidence of adverse events.
Time Frame: Throughout Study
Throughout Study

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The secondary objectives of this study are to assess the effect of different stimulation types on average pain and pain-related disability, and to assess the subjective comfort of paresthesia with different pulse widths.
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thomas Yearwood, MD, Comprehensive Pain and Rehabilitation

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2006

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 30, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

September 1, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 5, 2008

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 4, 2008

Last Verified

August 1, 2008

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SCS0705

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Precision Spinal Cord Stimulation System

3
Subscribe