Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) for Neuropathic Pain of Back or Lower Extremity

November 23, 2020 updated by: Boston Scientific Corporation

Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) for Neuropathic Pain of Back or Lower Extremity: A Comparison of Electrode Placement at T7 and T8

The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and patient preference for spinal cord stimulation (SCS) using the Precision device with the electrode array placed at T7 versus placement at T8. Eligible patients will have chronic intractable pain in the back or lower extremities and will have independently elected SCS as the next line of therapy. There is some anecdotal evidence that the coverage of the paresthesia resulting from T7 placement is preferable to that obtained by the more commonly used T8 placement but there has been no study to support this observation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The conventional implantation of the spinal cord stimulator calls for dual percutaneous leads placed at T8-T9 vertebral levels. Recently published studies as outlined in a letter to the editor of Neuromodulation suggest that a "well placed single lead will generally perform better than a dual lead." Furthermore, anecdotal reports suggest that lead placement at T7 will capture axial back pain with greater success compared to lead placement at alternative sites.

This study aims to achieve better pain treatment and paresthesia coverage by placing a single lead at T7.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

13

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Belleville, Illinois, United States, 62220
        • Anesthesia Associates of Belleville

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be diagnosed with chronic intractable neuropathic pain of moderate to severe intensity of the back or lower extremity and meeting the criteria for post-laminectomy syndrome, be eligible for SCS, and have independently elected SCS as next line of therapy.
  • Be 18 years of age or older.
  • Be willing and able to comply with all study related procedures and visits.
  • Be capable of reading and understanding patient information materials and giving written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have sensory loss in the low back or lower extremity as the primary complaint.
  • Have any significant medical condition that is likely to interfere with study procedures or likely to confound evaluation of study endpoints.
  • Have participated in any investigational drug or device trial in the last 4 weeks or plan to participate in any other study during the year.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 1
Stimulation will occur at the T7 followed by T8 during the trial implant period
During Trial Implant Period, stimulation from single lead initially turned on at the T7 or T8 level, then crossover. At time of permanent implant, subject chooses which level they want the stimulator turned on.
Active Comparator: 2
Stimulation will occur at the T8 followed by T7 during the trial implant period
During Trial Implant Period, stimulation from single lead initially turned on at the T7 or T8 level, then crossover. At time of permanent implant, subject chooses which level they want the stimulator turned on.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The Primary Efficacy Endpoint is Pain Severity After Trial Stimulation.
Time Frame: End of trial (approximately 5 days)
End of trial (approximately 5 days)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 13, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

November 15, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 19, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 23, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Precision for Spinal Cord Stimulation

Subscribe