Robotically Assisted Treadmill Training in Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)

April 11, 2014 updated by: US Department of Veterans Affairs

Cardiovascular Parameters for Lokomat Training in Chronic Incomplete SCI

This proposal investigates the hypothesis that progressive aerobic exercise with Lokomat is feasible in people with motor incomplete spinal cord injury, and three months of training will improve cardiovascular fitness and gait functionality when compared to physical therapy controls

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Little information is available about the cardiovascular effects of robotically assisted partial weight support treadmill training devices such as Lokomat in chronic incomplete spinal cord injured subjects. Task-oriented aerobic exercise has the potential to improve both neuromuscular function and cardiovascular metabolic fitness in neurological populations. Since spinal cord injured individuals are at an increased risk of developing premature cardiovascular disease, the investigation of robotic-assisted interventions in spinal cord injury (SCI) such as the Lokomat may have important health benefits in both cardiovascular fitness as well as functional mobility.

This proposal investigates the hypothesis that progressive aerobic exercise with Lokomat is feasible in motor incomplete SCI, and three months of training will improve cardiovascular fitness and gait functionality when compared to physical therapy controls. We propose a two-phase study to examine the feasibility, reliability and utility of aerobic exercise metabolic testing and training during robotically assisted partial weight support treadmill walking in individuals with chronic motor incomplete spinal cord injury (CMISCI). During the first phase of the study we will manipulate Lokomat training parameters of treadmill speed and percent of partial weight support to assess the effect of these changes on heart rate, perceived exertion, and oxygen consumption in untrained chronic motor incomplete spinal cord injured subjects. Subjects will be asked to maintain cardiovascular or muscular effort during testing and will be monitored in this regard by the force biofeedback system built into the Lokomat. After determining threshold levels for initial cardiovascular response, submaximal and then peak exercise testing will be attempted. These studies will be repeated on a separate day to determine the reliability of the testing results. Thirty-six subjects with varying levels of injury between C4 and L2 and ASIA (American Spinal Injury) Impairment Scales of C and D will be recruited. We anticipate that subjects with greater ASIA motor scores will require either a faster initial treadmill speed or less partial weight support to produce an initial cardiovascular response. It is also anticipated that peak exercise testing using open circuit spirometry with subjects on the Lokomat will be a feasible, reliable and valid measurement. This phase of the study will be aimed at establishing guidelines for determining initial training parameters for use in an aerobic exercise protocol using the Lokomat.

The second phase of this pilot study will be a controlled trial of three-month progressive aerobic Lokomat exercise in chronic incomplete spinal cord injured subjects. The aim of this trial will be to determine whether progressive Lokomat training will improve cardiovascular fitness and ambulatory function when compared to matched impairment severity CMISCI subjects receiving the same duration of usual physical therapy care. Thirty-six subjects will be recruited into this phase of the study. Open spirometric evaluation of cardiovascular parameters as outlined in phase one of the proposal will be measured at baseline, 1 months, and 3 months. Initial, six-week and post-study ambulatory function evaluations including the WISCI (Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury), a timed 10 meter walk, a measured walk over 6 minutes, and a gait analysis will also be determined. It is hypothesized that aerobic Lokomat exercise will improve cardiovascular fitness as determined by an increase in VO2 (oxygen consumption) peak and improve function as determined by timed walks and gait parameters in these subjects. The results of this pilot and development study will provide the necessary information to design larger randomized clinical trials.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201
        • VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21207
        • University of Maryland Rehabilitation and Orthopaedic Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 78 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Acute onset Spinal Cord Injury or Disease at least 12 months prior to enrollment
  • Age 18 to 80
  • Level of injury from C4 to L2
  • ASIA impairment scale either C or D
  • Able to tolerate standing frame for at least 30 minutes

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of unstable angina, recent MI (myocardial infarction), CHF (congestive heart failure) or clinically significant valvular dysfunction
  • History of recent hospitalization (<3 months) for a major medical problem

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Lokomat training
Subjects will receive active exercise treatment in the Lokomat device 3 times per week for 3 months. Each session will last approximately 45 minutes.
The Lokomat is a robotically assisted partial weight suspension treadmill training device that has the potential to restore leg function in persons with incomplete leg paralysis.
Active Comparator: Home stretching then Lokomat training
Patients will participate in a home stretching program for 3 months. They will then be crossed over to an active Lokomat treatment for a subsequent 3 months.
Patients will be instructed by a physical therapist on how to perform a home stretching protocol 3 times per week for 3 months. The stretching will be monitored via telephone by the study coordinator. This will be an active control arm. After 3 months the patients will be crossed over to Lokomat training for an additional 3 months. This training will be the same as given to the individuals originally randomized to the Lokomat treatment intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cardiovascular Fitness as Determined by Lokomat Peak VO2 Assessments
Time Frame: 0, 1.5 and 3, 4.5, and 6 months

Peak V02 measurements taken during Lokomat exercise in order to measure cardiovascular fitness.

Please note that at times the home stretching group would have a second set of measurements at 3 months - one post the 3 month time interval and one later in the 3rd month if there was some delay in initiating the crossover to Lokomat training. This sometimes occurred if the time it would take to complete all of the required studies (e.g. DXA, other secondary measures) was prolonged because of logistical issues.

0, 1.5 and 3, 4.5, and 6 months
Cardiovascular Fitness as Determined by Arm Cycle Ergometry VO2 Peak Assessments.
Time Frame: 0, 1.5 and 3, 4.5, and 6 months

Peak oxygen consumption during arm cycle ergometry as a measure of cardiovascular fitness.

Please note that at times the home stretching group would have a second set of measurements at 3 months - one post the 3 month time interval and one later in the 3rd month if there was some delay in initiating the crossover to Lokomat training. This sometimes occurred if the time it would take to complete all of the required studies (e.g. DXA, other secondary measures) was prolonged because of logistical issues.

0, 1.5 and 3, 4.5, and 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Body Mass
Time Frame: Measured at Baseline (Time point 0), 3, and 6 months

DXA assessment of total body mass.

Please note that at times the home stretching group would have a second set of measurements at 3 months - one post the 3 month time interval and one later in the 3rd month if there was some delay in initiating the crossover to Lokomat training. This sometimes occurred if the time it would take to complete all of the required studies (e.g. DXA, other secondary measures) was prolonged because of logistical issues.

Measured at Baseline (Time point 0), 3, and 6 months
Percent Body Fat
Time Frame: Measured at Baseline (Time point 0), 3, and 6 months

An assessment of percent body fat as determined by DXA analysis.

Please note that at times the home stretching group would have a second set of measurements at 3 months - one post the 3 month time interval and one later in the 3rd month if there was some delay in initiating the crossover to Lokomat training. This sometimes occurred if the time it would take to complete all of the required studies (e.g. DXA, other secondary measures) was prolonged because of logistical issues.

Measured at Baseline (Time point 0), 3, and 6 months
Lean Muscle Mass
Time Frame: Measured at Baseline (Time point 0) and 3 months

DXA measurement of total lean muscle mass.

Please note that at times the home stretching group would have a second set of measurements at 3 months - one post the 3 month time interval and one later in the 3rd month if there was some delay in initiating the crossover to Lokomat training. This sometimes occurred if the time it would take to complete all of the required studies (e.g. DXA, other secondary measures) was prolonged because of logistical issues.

Measured at Baseline (Time point 0) and 3 months
Bone Mineral Content
Time Frame: Measured at Baseline (Time point 0), 3, and 6 months

DXA assessment of bone mineral content.

Please note that at times the home stretching group would have a second set of measurements at 3 months - one post the 3 month time interval and one later in the 3rd month if there was some delay in initiating the crossover to Lokomat training. This sometimes occurred if the time it would take to complete all of the required studies (e.g. DXA, other secondary measures) was prolonged because of logistical issues.

Measured at Baseline (Time point 0), 3, and 6 months
Six Minute Walk
Time Frame: Measured Baseline (Time point 0) and 3 months

A functional capacity test to evaluate walking distance during a 6-minute time frame.

This measure was only done on those participants that were able to walk for 6 minutes, which represented 9 in the Lokomat training group out of the 12 total randomized to Lokomat training, and 5 out of the 6 randomized to the home stretching group.

Please note that at times the home stretching group would have a second set of measurements at 3 months - one post the 3 month time interval and one later in the 3rd month if there was some delay in initiating the crossover to Lokomat training. This sometimes occurred if the time it would take to complete all of the required studies (e.g. DXA, other secondary measures) was prolonged because of logistical issues.

Measured Baseline (Time point 0) and 3 months
10-meter Walk
Time Frame: Measured at Baseline (Time point 0) and 3 months

A functional capacity test to measure speed.

This measure was only done on those participants that were able to walk, which represented 9 in the Lokomat training group out of the 12 total randomized to Lokomat training, and 5 out of the 6 who were randomized to home stretching.

Note that at times the home stretching group would have a second set of measurements at 3 months - one post the 3 month time interval and one later in the 3rd month if there was some delay in initiating the crossover to Lokomat training. This sometimes occurred if the time it would take to complete all of the required studies (e.g. DXA, other secondary measures) was prolonged because of logistical issues.

Measured at Baseline (Time point 0) and 3 months
Step Activity Monitor
Time Frame: Measured at Baseline (Time point 0) and 3 months

The step activity monitor measures the total steps taken by an individual over a 48 hour time frame in the home environment.

This measure was only done on those participants that were able to walk in the community and did not use a wheelchair for community mobility, which represented 7 in the Lokomat training group out of the 12 total randomized to Lokomat training and 5 out of 6 of the people randomized to home stretching.

Please note that at times the home stretching group would have a second set of measurements at 3 months - one post the 3 month time interval and one later in the 3rd month if there was some delay in initiating the crossover to Lokomat training. This sometimes occurred if the time it would take to complete all of the required studies (e.g. DXA, other secondary measures) was prolonged because of logistical issues.

Measured at Baseline (Time point 0) and 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Peter Gorman, MD MS, VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 6, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

October 11, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 14, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2014

Last Verified

April 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • B4027
  • B40271 (Other Identifier: UMB-IRB old BRAAN system)
  • HP-00042597 (Other Identifier: UMB-IRB)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injury

Clinical Trials on Lokomat Training

3
Subscribe