The Effectiveness of Robotic Assisted Gait Training as an Adjunct to Traditional Physiotherapy in Cerebral Palsy (RAGT)

March 24, 2022 updated by: Dragana Djuric, Fatima College of Health Sciences

Need for study

There are a few studies published on this topic from various parts of the globe and the results are mixed. Hence further research is required in this area and none of the studies have included samples from the Middle East.

Some studies done in this area focus on biomechanical aspects of gait (Cherni, 2018) and our study mainly focuses on functional aspects of gait and quality of life.

Studies done on this area focus highly on gait components and very little is available on the literature on improving balance. Since balance and stability are crucial for walking, it was decided to exclusively assess balance.

Due to a wide range of therapeutic benefits, it is paramount to evaluate the effectiveness of different therapies provided to improve gait.

Aim of the study:

The aim of the proposed research is to investigate the effectiveness of robotic assisted gait training using Lokomat device as an adjunct in improving gait, balance and quality of life in children with cerebral palsy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Background: Gait and balance have been a major issue faced by cerebral palsy children. Cerebral Palsy is the most common condition affecting around 2-2.5 children of 1000 live births (1 in every 400 children) over the last 20 years in the Western world (Levit, 2019). Cerebral Palsy causes complex issues related to physical, psychological and social functions. Active participation and the highest level of independence during daily living are primary goals for cerebral palsy children (Aurich, 2015). One of the major problems that limits activities of daily living is relate to gait and balance in cerebral palsy. From the past one-decade, the popularity of robotic assisted gait training devices have been increasing. There are a studies published on this topic from various parts of the globe and the results are mixed. Recent publications have demonstrated robotic assisted gait training benefits people with cerebral palsy, specifically in increasing walking speed and endurance (Carvalho, 2017). However, the efficacy of robotic assisted gait training in improving gait and balance is not well researched. This study will be the first one in the United Arab Emirates studying the local population and mainly focusing on functional aspects of gait, balance and quality of life.

Aims: The main aim is to investigate the effectiveness of robotic -assisted gait training as an adjunct to traditional physiotherapy to improve gait, balance and quality of life in children with cerebral palsy.

Research hypothesis: Robotic -assisted gait training applied as adjunct to traditional therapy could improve balance, walking and quality of life in children with cerebral palsy.

Methodology: The participants attending the outpatient clinic at Zayed Higher Organization for People of Determination, Abu Dhabi will be invited to take part in the study. They will be randomly allocated to two groups. This study proposes to have 50 participants with at least 25 in each group. The participants will all have spastic form of cerebral palsy as possible with the age of 4-18 years. All the participants will have to have be at Gross Motor Function Classification Level (GMFCS) level I- IV. The robotic -assisted gait training include 5 sessions per week, of 40 min long session during one-month period. The conventional physiotherapy includes 5 sessions per week of 40 min long session during one-month period. The primary analysis will be the pre to post-test differences of the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-88),dimension D & E, 10 meters walk test, 6 minute walk test, Pediatric Balance Scale, Cerebral palsy Quality of Life questionnaire between experimental and control group.

Data analysis: Data will be statistically analysed using one-way anova. Descriptive statistics and graphic displays will be present for all outcomes for interventions comparing robotic -assisted gait training with traditional physiotherapy training.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

41

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

4 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Cerebral palsy with spastic and mix form

    • Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS from level II to IV)
    • Age 4 to 18
    • No contraindications for the training in the Lokomat
    • Able to follow simple instructions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • On botox injection within the last 6 months (as the effect of botox wear out in 6 months)

    • Surgery within the last one year
    • Fixed contractures and/or with bone instability
    • Baclofen infusion pumps in situ
    • Seizure disorder that is not controlled by medication (if on medication, must not have had a seizure in the last 12 months);
    • Open skin lesions or vascular disorder of lower extremities;
    • Having participated in another Lokomat training regime within the previous 3months as well as a change in concomitant treatment within the last 4 weeks before or during the study period

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Robotic -assisted gait training group using Lokomat device
  • 5 sessions of 40 minutes of conventional therapy and
  • 5 sessions of 40 minutes on Lokomat per week

Control group will receive the routine conventional physiotherapy treatment and the treatment for this group consists of the following:

Conventional therapy protocol:

  • 5 sessions of 45 minutes a week, each session includes:
  • 5 minutes of stretching exercise
  • 20 minutes of strengthening exercise
  • 10 minutes of balance exercise
  • 10 minutes of gait training

Experimental group will receive 45 min of Lokomat in addition to the conventional approach (as explained above). Since Lokomat appointments can be only 8 per day, it is planned to have two groups of 8 participants for 4 weeks each. The Lokomat training include the following:

  • 5 sessions of 45 minutes of conventional therapy (same as above) per week
  • 5 sessions of 45 minutes on Lokomat per week
Other Names:
  • Conventional therapy
Active Comparator: Traditional therapy group
• 5 sessions of 40 minutes of conventional therapy

Control group will receive the routine conventional physiotherapy treatment and the treatment for this group consists of the following:

Conventional therapy protocol:

  • 5 sessions of 45 minutes a week, each session includes:
  • 5 minutes of stretching exercise
  • 20 minutes of strengthening exercise
  • 10 minutes of balance exercise
  • 10 minutes of gait training

Experimental group will receive 45 min of Lokomat in addition to the conventional approach (as explained above). Since Lokomat appointments can be only 8 per day, it is planned to have two groups of 8 participants for 4 weeks each. The Lokomat training include the following:

  • 5 sessions of 45 minutes of conventional therapy (same as above) per week
  • 5 sessions of 45 minutes on Lokomat per week
Other Names:
  • Conventional therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gross Motor Function Measure ( GMFM- 88) - dimension D & dimension E
Time Frame: Baseline time 0 and up to 8 weeks
This is the validated test designed to measure change in gross motor function over time in children with cerebral palsy. Dimension D consist of 13 items for standing ability and dimension E has 24 items to assess walking, jumping and running in cerebral palsy children. Its a four point scoring system. Specific descriptors for each score is given in the Manual of GMFM-88.
Baseline time 0 and up to 8 weeks
6 minute Walk test
Time Frame: Baseline time 0 and up to 8 weeks
The test has been selected as a measure of gait endurance. This is validated test requiring individuals to walk 6 minutes on flat hard floor. Scoring is walking distance.
Baseline time 0 and up to 8 weeks
10 meters Walk test
Time Frame: Baseline time 0 and up to 8 weeks
The test has been selected as a measure of gait speed. This is validated test requiring individuals to walk on flat hard floor at their comfortable speed for 10 meters.
Baseline time 0 and up to 8 weeks
Pediatric Balance Scale
Time Frame: Baseline time 0 and up to 8 weeks
14 items valid scale is used to assess functional balance skills in children with spastic cerebral palsy.
Baseline time 0 and up to 8 weeks
Cerebral Palsy Quality of Life questionnaire for child (CP QOL-child) and Cerebral Palsy Quality of Life questionnaire for adolescent (CP QOL- teen)
Time Frame: Baseline time 0 and up to 8 weeks
This Arabic validated CP QOL- child for age 4-12 and CP QOL- teen for age 13-18 questionnaires are used in the parent version. Its assesses 7 domains on a 9 level point Likert scale.
Baseline time 0 and up to 8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Range of motion
Time Frame: Baseline time 0 and up to 8 weeks
Measuring range of motion in hip, knee, ankle joint using the reliable tool called goniometer.
Baseline time 0 and up to 8 weeks
The Oxford scale
Time Frame: Baseline time 0 and up to 8 weeks
The most commonly used scale for testing muscle strength.
Baseline time 0 and up to 8 weeks
Modified Ashworth Scale
Time Frame: Baseline time 0 and up to 8 weeks
It is a muscle tone assessment.
Baseline time 0 and up to 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dragana Djuric, FCHS

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 8, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 2, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

July 14, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • INTSTF018PHY20

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy

Clinical Trials on Lokomat training

Subscribe