Efficacy/Safety of Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy and Ranibizumab Compared With Ranibizumab in Patients With Subfoveal Choroidal Neovascularization

March 23, 2011 updated by: Novartis

A 24-month Randomized, Double-masked, Controlled, Multicenter, Phase IIIB Study Assessing Safety and Efficacy of Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy Administered in Conjunction With Ranibizumab Versus Ranibizumab Monotherapy in Patients With Subfoveal Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Age-related Macular Degeneration

This study evaluated the effect of combination therapy with verteporfin photodynamic therapy and ranibizumab on visual acuity and anatomic outcomes compared to ranibizumab monotherapy and the durability of response observed in patients with choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

321

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T5H OX5
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 3N9
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Nova Scotia
      • Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, B3H 2Y6
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 4G5
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 4G5
        • Ivey Eye Institute, Dr. Thomas Sheidow
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, KIH 8L6
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H2L 4MI
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Arizona
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85704
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • California
      • Beverly Hills, California, United States, 90211
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Oakland, California, United States, 94609
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Pasadena, California, United States, 91105-3153
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95819
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94107
        • West Coast Retina Medical Group Inc. - 185 Berry St. Suite 130
      • Santa Ana, California, United States, 92705
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80210
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Hawaii
      • Aiea, Hawaii, United States, 96701
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Iowa
      • Iowa City, Iowa, United States, 52242
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Kansas
      • Wichita, Kansas, United States, 67214
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40509
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Paducah, Kentucky, United States, 42001
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21205
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Michigan
      • Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States, 49252
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Royal Oak, Michigan, United States, 48073
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Williamsburg, Michigan, United States, 49690
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Missouri
      • Independence, Missouri, United States, 64055
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • St. Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • New Jersey
      • Toms River, New Jersey, United States, 08755
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • New York
      • Lynbrook, New York, United States, 11563
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14620
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Ohio
      • Beachwood, Ohio, United States, 44122
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45242
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • West Mifflin, Pennsylvania, United States, 15122
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • South Carolina
      • West Columbia, South Carolina, United States, 29169
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • South Dakota
      • Rapid City, South Dakota, United States, 57701
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Tennessee
      • Kingsport, Tennessee, United States, 37660
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Knoxville, Tennessee, United States, 37909
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78705
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Virginia
      • Fairfax, Virginia, United States, 22031
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23226
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Wisconsin
      • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53226
        • Novartis Investigative Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects of either gender age 50 years or older
  • Subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) due to age-related macular degeneration (AMD)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Choroidal neovascularization due to causes other than AMD
  • Prior treatment for neovascular AMD in the study eye

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Verteporfin With Standard Fluence Rate Plus Ranibizumab
Patients received three consecutive monthly ranibizumab injections on Day 1 and at Months 1 and 2, and thereafter as needed at intervals of at least 30 days based on retreatment criteria. These patients also received verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT) with standard fluence (SF) rate on Day 1 and then as needed from Month 3 at intervals of at least 90 days based on the retreatment criteria. From month 3 onward, retreatments were determined based on study-specific retreatment criteria that included retinal thickness by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), sub-retinal hemorrhage evaluated by ophthalmoscopic examination, visual acuity assessed using Early treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity chart and choroidal neovascularization (CNV) leakage assessed by fluorescein angiography (FA). Patients received sham intravitreal injections for the first 12 months if retreatment with ranibizumab was not warranted based on the retreatment criteria.
After a 10-minute intravenous infusion of verteporfin at a dose of 6 mg/m^2 body surface area, verteporfin was activated by light application of 50 J/cm^2 (Standard Fluence rate) or 25 J/cm^2 (Reduced Fluence rate) to the study eye, begun 15 minutes after the start of the infusion.
Other Names:
  • Visudyne
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg administered as an intravitreal injection.
Other Names:
  • Lucentis
To maintain masking, patients in the combination groups received sham intravitreal injections whenever retreatment with active Ranibizumab was not warranted based on the retreatment algorithm.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Ranibizumab Monotherapy
Patients received monthly ranibizumab injections for 12 months and thereafter as needed based on the retreatment criteria. These patients were also administered verteporfin placebo infusion with sham PDT on Day 1 and then as needed from Month 3 at intervals of at least 90 days based on the retreatment criteria. Retreatments were determined based on study specific retreatment criteria that included retinal thickness by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), sub-retinal hemorrhage evaluated by ophthalmoscopic examination, visual acuity assessed using Early treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity chart and choroidal neovascularization (CNV) leakage assessed by fluorescein angiography (FA).
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg administered as an intravitreal injection.
Other Names:
  • Lucentis
To maintain masking, as a placebo for verteporfin photodynamic therapy, patients were administered a 10-minute intravenous infusion of 5% dextrose solution, followed by light application of 50 J/cm^2 to the study eye, begun 15 minutes after the start of infusion.
EXPERIMENTAL: Verteporfin With Reduced Fluence Rate Plus Ranibizumab
Patients received three consecutive monthly ranibizumab injections on Day 1 and at Months 1 and 2, and thereafter as needed at intervals of at least 30 days based on retreatment criteria. These patients also received verteporfin PDT with reduced fluence (RF) rate on Day 1 and then as needed from Month 3 at intervals of at least 90 days based on the retreatment criteria. From month 3 onward, retreatments were determined based on study-specific retreatment criteria that included retinal thickness by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), sub-retinal hemorrhage evaluated by ophthalmoscopic examination, visual acuity assessed using Early treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity chart and choroidal neovascularization (CNV) leakage assessed by fluorescein angiography (FA). Patients received sham intravitreal injections for the first 12 months if retreatment with ranibizumab was not warranted based on the retreatment criteria.
After a 10-minute intravenous infusion of verteporfin at a dose of 6 mg/m^2 body surface area, verteporfin was activated by light application of 50 J/cm^2 (Standard Fluence rate) or 25 J/cm^2 (Reduced Fluence rate) to the study eye, begun 15 minutes after the start of the infusion.
Other Names:
  • Visudyne
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg administered as an intravitreal injection.
Other Names:
  • Lucentis
To maintain masking, patients in the combination groups received sham intravitreal injections whenever retreatment with active Ranibizumab was not warranted based on the retreatment algorithm.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) of the Study Eye at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12
BCVA score was based on the number of letters read correctly on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity chart assessed at a starting distance of 4 meters. An ETDRS visual acuity score of 85 is approximately 20/20. An increase in the VA score indicates improvement in visual acuity.
Baseline and Month 12
Percent of Patients With a Treatment-free Interval of at Least 3 Months Following the Month 2 Visit
Time Frame: Month 2 up to Month 11
The number of patients with a ranibizumab treatment-free interval, ie, no active ranibizumab treatments for at least 3 months duration (at least 2 consecutive monthly visits), anytime following the Month 2 ranibizumab treatment. Only active ranibizumab treatments were considered.
Month 2 up to Month 11

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Total Area of Leakage of the Study Eye at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12
Total area of leakage of the study eye was assessed at the Central Reading Center (CRC) using Fluorescein angiography (FA).
Baseline and Month 12
Percentage of Patients With Fluorescein Leakage in the Study Eye at Month 12
Time Frame: Month 12
The percentage of patients with leakage of the study eye was assessed at the Central Reading Center (CRC) using Fluorescein angiography (FA).
Month 12
Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12
Optical coherence tomography was performed in the study eyes and the evaluations of the images were performed by the central reading center.
Baseline and Month 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2007

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2009

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 16, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2007

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 19, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

April 19, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2011

Last Verified

March 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Macular Degeneration

Clinical Trials on Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy

3
Subscribe