Efficacy of Preoperative Education and Mini-invasive Surgery for Total Hip Replacement (ANRACT)

Evaluation of Preoperative Education and Mini-invasive Total Hip Replacement in Regard to the Attainment of Functional Independency and Reduction of Hospital Stay

We propose to evaluate a preoperative education of the patient and a new surgical technique (the mini-invasive THR) that could reduce the time to achieve functional independence.

The primary objective of the trial is to assess the time to reach functional independence after total hip replacement depending on the treatment groups: preoperative education versus no preoperative education and mini-invasive procedure versus standard procedure. The study hypothesis is that education and mini-invasive procedure will reduce the time to reach functional independence.

This is a prospective trial with a double randomization.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

We propose to evaluate a preoperative education of the patient and a new surgical technique (the mini-invasive THR) that could reduce the time to achieve functional independence. Preoperative education is compared to no education and the mini-invasive surgery is compared to the standard group.

The education is based on explaining to the patient what will the postoperative rehabilitation be like.

The mini-invasive THR is based on the minimisation of soft tissue trauma. It requires a specific instrumentation to allow dissection and implantation of the prosthesis. Only few studies have evaluated such a technique. However, these studies were retrospective or non-randomised and results are contradictory. Therefore, a randomised controlled clinical trial is necessary to evaluate the possible benefits and feasibility of this technique.

The primary outcome is the time to reach functional independence. Secondary outcomes evaluate the duration of hospital stay, the quality of implantation of the prosthesis, the postoperative morbidity, the functional benefits and the quality of life.

Methods: this monocentric randomised controlled clinical trial compares the preoperative education versus no preoperative education (first randomization) and the conventional THR to the mini-invasive THR (second randomization). One hundred and forty patients will be included in each group.

Expected results: preoperative education and the mini-invasive THR are prone to decrease time to functional independence, postoperative morbidity and duration of hospital stay.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

215

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • osteoarthritis of the hip
  • avascular necrosis of the hip
  • patient between 40 and 90 years old (included)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of previous hip operation (bone)
  • patient >90 or < 40
  • inflammatory arthritis
  • important proximal femur or acetabular deformity
  • complete functional independence not possible
  • BMI > 30

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to reach functional independence at hospital discharge
Time Frame: during de study
Time to reach functional independence at hospital discharge
during de study

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perioperative criteria :
Time Frame: during the study
Perioperative criteria :
during the study
estimated blood loss
Time Frame: during the study
estimated blood loss
during the study
duration of operation
Time Frame: during the study
duration of operation
during the study
implant position
Time Frame: during the study
implant position
during the study
implant fixation
Time Frame: during th study
implant fixation
during th study
perioperative technical errors
Time Frame: during the study
perioperative technical errors
during the study
Postoperative during hospital stay:
Time Frame: during the study
Postoperative during hospital stay:
during the study
number of patients and number of units transfused before hospital discharge
Time Frame: during the study
number of patients and number of units transfused before hospital discharge
during the study
total estimated blood loss
Time Frame: during the study
total estimated blood loss
during the study
postoperative pain
Time Frame: during the study
postoperative pain
during the study
skin problems
Time Frame: during the study
skin problems
during the study
duration of hospital stay
Time Frame: during the study
duration of hospital stay
during the study
Postoperative (3, 6 and 12 months):
Time Frame: during the study
Postoperative (3, 6 and 12 months):
during the study
Harris hip score, SF-36, evaluation of satisfaction and expectation
Time Frame: during the study
Harris hip score, SF-36, evaluation of satisfaction and expectation
during the study
Abduction strength, balance and gate
Time Frame: during the study
Abduction strength, balance and gate
during the study
Scar assessment
Time Frame: during the study
Scar assessment
during the study
complications
Time Frame: during the study
complications
during the study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Philippe ANRACT, PU-PH, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2012

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 18, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

March 20, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 5, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 4, 2012

Last Verified

March 1, 2007

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis of the Hip

Clinical Trials on -preoperative education and total hip replacement

Subscribe