Study to Assess The Efficacy and Safety of a PARP Inhibitor For The Treatment of BRCA-positive Advanced Breast Cancer (ICEBERG 1)

January 18, 2024 updated by: AstraZeneca

A Phase II, Open-label, Non-comparative, International, Multicentre Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of KU-0059436 Given Orally Twice Daily in Patients With Advanced BRCA1- or BRCA2-associated Breast Cancer.

The purpose of the study is to see if the drug KU-0059436 (olaparib) is effective and well tolerated in treating participants with measurable breast cancer gene (BRCA)1- or BRCA2-positive advanced breast cancer and for whom no curative therapeutic option exists.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a Phase II, open-label, non-comparative, international, multicenter study to assess the efficacy and safety of olaparib when given orally twice daily (bd) in participants with advanced BRCA1- or BRCA2- associated breast cancer. Two sequential participant cohorts will receive continuous oral olaparib in 28-day cycles. The first cohort will receive 400 mg bd and the second cohort will receive 100 mg bd.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

54

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Melbourne, Australia, 3000
        • Research Site
      • Randwick, Australia, 2031
        • Research Site
    • CA
      • Duarte, CA, Canada, 91010
        • Research Site
      • Kiel, Germany, 24105
        • Research Site
      • Köln, Germany, 50937
        • Research Site
      • München, Germany, 81675
        • Research Site
      • Tel-Aviv, Israel, 6423906
        • Research Site
      • Hospitalet deLlobregat, Spain, 08907
        • Research Site
      • Madrid, Spain, 08035
        • Research Site
      • Lund, Sweden, 221 85
        • Research Site
      • Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB2 0QQ
        • Research Site
      • Edinburgh, United Kingdom, EH4 2XR
        • Research Site
      • Fulham, United Kingdom, SW3 6JJ
        • Research Site
      • London, United Kingdom, SE1 9RT
        • Research Site
      • Manchester, United Kingdom, M20 4BX
        • Research Site
    • California
      • West Hollywood, California, United States, 90048
        • Research Site
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 130 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Advanced breast cancer with positive BRCA1 or BRCA2 status
  • Failed at least one prior chemotherapy
  • In investigators opinion, no curative standard therapy exists
  • Measurable disease

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Brain metastases
  • Less than 28 days since last treatment used to treat the disease
  • Considered a poor medical risk due to a serious uncontrolled disorder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Olaparib 100 mg
Participants will receive two 50 mg capsules in the morning and two 50 mg capsules in the evening in 28-days cycle until confirmed disease progression, continuous treatment interruption, unacceptable toxicity or any other discontinuation criterion is met.
Participants will receive capsules of olaparib orally as stated in arm description.
Other Names:
  • AZD2281
  • KU-0059436
Experimental: Olaparib 400 mg
Participants will receive eight 50 mg capsules in the morning and eight 50 mg capsules in the evening in 28-days cycle until confirmed disease progression, continuous treatment interruption, unacceptable toxicity or any other discontinuation criterion is met.
Participants will receive capsules of olaparib orally as stated in arm description.
Other Names:
  • AZD2281
  • KU-0059436

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Confirmed Objective Response Rate (ORR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Criteria
Time Frame: Baseline (Days -28 to 0), Day 1 of Cycle 3, thereafter every alternate cycles until study termination or withdrawal (approximately up to 2 years)
The ORR is the percentage of participants whose best tumor response is either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), according to the RECIST v1.0 criteria. The CR is defined as disappearance of all target lesions (TLs). The PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameters (LD) taking as reference the baseline sum of LD. Percentage of participants with ORR is reported.
Baseline (Days -28 to 0), Day 1 of Cycle 3, thereafter every alternate cycles until study termination or withdrawal (approximately up to 2 years)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of Response (DoR) to Olaparib
Time Frame: Baseline (Days -28 to 0), Day 1 of Cycle 3, thereafter every alternate cycles until study termination or withdrawal (approximately up to 2 years)
Duration of response is defined as the date of progression per RECIST criteria - the date when CR or PR [whichever is earliest] is confirmed + 1. The CR is defined as disappearance of all TLs. The PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of LD taking as reference the baseline sum of LD. Duration of response was analyzed for those participants who had OR.
Baseline (Days -28 to 0), Day 1 of Cycle 3, thereafter every alternate cycles until study termination or withdrawal (approximately up to 2 years)
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)
Time Frame: From Day 1 of Cycle 3 through study withdrawal (approximately up to 2 years)
The CBR is defined as the percentage of participants with a RECIST tumor response of confirmed CR, PR or stable disease (SD) for ≥ 8 weeks +/- 1 week visit window. The CR is defined as disappearance of all TLs. The PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of LD taking as reference the baseline sum of LD. Stable disease is neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD taking as references the smallest sum of LD since the treatment started.
From Day 1 of Cycle 3 through study withdrawal (approximately up to 2 years)
Best Percentage Change in Tumor Size
Time Frame: Baseline (Days -28 to 0) through study withdrawal (approximately up to 2 years)
The tumor size is defined as the sum of the longest diameters as measured among all target lesions. At each assessment, the percentage change in tumor size is defined as 100 × 1 - (sum of all target lesion diameters at visit/sum of all target lesion diameters at baseline).
Baseline (Days -28 to 0) through study withdrawal (approximately up to 2 years)
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: Baseline (Days -28 to 0), Day 1 of Cycle 3, thereafter every alternate cycles until study termination or withdrawal (approximately up to 2 years)
PFS is defined as the time from first dose to the earlier date of radiologic progression (as per RECIST criteria) or death by any cause in the absence of objective progression. Those participants who were withdrawn from the study without disease progression were regarded as censored at their last evaluable RECIST assessment. Where participants had not progressed at the termination of the study, they were also regarded as censored at their last evaluable RECIST assessment. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimate.
Baseline (Days -28 to 0), Day 1 of Cycle 3, thereafter every alternate cycles until study termination or withdrawal (approximately up to 2 years)
Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Total Score From Baseline
Time Frame: Screening (Days -7 to 0), Day 1 Cycle 7 (ie, after completing 6 cycles of treatment) and study withdrawal (approximately up to 2 years).
ECOG performance status is used by researchers to assess how a participant's disease is progressing. The scores are: 0=Fully Active, able to carry out work without restrictions; 1=Restricted activity and able to carry out light work or sedentary nature; 2=capable of self-care but unable to carry out work activities; 3=Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours; 4=Completely Disabled, and totally confined to bed or chair; 5=Dead. Change in ECOG performance status was defined as improved (less than the baseline value), no change (same as at baseline), worsened (greater than the baseline value) or missing (score is missing or was not recorded at baseline). If no measurement was recorded at Cycle 1 Day 1, the change was calculated in relation to the last recorded ECOG value prior to Day 1.
Screening (Days -7 to 0), Day 1 Cycle 7 (ie, after completing 6 cycles of treatment) and study withdrawal (approximately up to 2 years).
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
Time Frame: Day 1 through Day 480 (maximum observed duration)
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. The TEAEs are defined as events present at baseline that worsened in intensity after administration of study drug or events absent at baseline that emerged after administration of study drug.
Day 1 through Day 480 (maximum observed duration)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs From Baseline
Time Frame: Day 1 through Day 480 (maximum observed duration)
Number of participants with clinically significant changes in vital signs are reported. Vital sign parameters included body temperature, blood pressure, and pulse rate.
Day 1 through Day 480 (maximum observed duration)
Number of Participants With at Least 2-Grade Change From Baseline to Worst Toxicity Grade in Clinical Laboratory Parameters
Time Frame: Day 1 through Day 480 (maximum observed duration)
Number of participants with at least 2-grade change from baseline to worst toxicity grade in clinical laboratory parameters are reported. Laboratory parameters included hematology, clinical chemistry, and urinalysis.
Day 1 through Day 480 (maximum observed duration)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: James Carmichael, BSc, MBChB, MD, FRCP, KuDOS Pharmaceuticals Limited
  • Principal Investigator: Andrew Tutt, PhD MRCP FRCR, Guy's and St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 15, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 27, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

December 21, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 27, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 28, 2007

First Posted (Estimated)

June 29, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Qualified researchers can request access to anonymized individual patient-level data from AstraZeneca group of companies sponsored clinical trials via the request portal. All request will be evaluated as per the AZ disclosure commitment: https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

AstraZeneca will meet or exceed data availability as per the commitments made to the EFPIA Pharma Data Sharing Principles. For details of our timelines, please rerefer to our disclosure commitment at https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

When a request has been approved AstraZeneca will provide access to the de-identified individual patient-level data in an approved sponsored tool . Signed Data Sharing Agreement (non-negotiable contract for data accessors) must be in place before accessing requested information. Additionally, all users will need to accept the terms and conditions of the SAS MSE to gain access. For additional details, please review the Disclosure Statements at https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Olaparib

3
Subscribe