Impact of Resynchronization Therapy on Sleep Disordered Breathing in Advanced Congestive Heart Failure (IMPACT)

September 17, 2012 updated by: VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System

Background and Introduction:

SDB is increasingly recognized as a co-morbidity with significant impact on overall health. The disorder has been implicated in the development of hypertension, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease as well as arrhythmia, stroke and the progression of congestive heart failure. The disorder is prevalent among males, estimated to affect upto 24% of the general population. Its prevalence increases with age, and it is particularly prevalent among patients with congestive heart failure with the prevalence rising to 51% in that group. Interestingly, recent evidence points to a potential impact for treating sleep disordered breathing, on heart failure patients. At the same time, recent reports of a beneficial impact of atrial overdrive pacing on SDB, have stirred interest in a potentially effective and well tolerated non-pharmacologic means of therapy for this disorder. Particularly at a time when cardiac resynchronization therapy utilizing biventricular pacing has demonstrated significant impact on heart failure, the interplay between CHF and SDB pacemaker based therapy begs further exploration. The interdependence of potential positive impact on each entity needs to be elucidated for further research and refinement of therapeutic tools. Furthermore, this study aims to explore potential neurohormonal influence on and affection by each of these disorders.

Specific Aims and Hypotheses:

Specific Aim #1: To assess the effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with or without atrial pacing on SDB in patients with advanced CHF at 8 and 16 weeks after implementation of therapy.

Hypothesis #1: Resynchronization therapy improves SDB, the effect may anticipate or lag improvement in heart failure. Atrial pacing has a beneficial effect in addition to CRT.

Specific Aim #2: To explore the effect of CRT on cardiac neuro-hormonal activity in relation to its effects on CHF and SDB.

Hypothesis #2: CRT neuro-hormonal modulation is a common path in its effects on SDB and CHF.

Specific Aim #3: To assess prevalence of sleep disordered breathing (SDB) in patients with advanced congestive heart failure (CHF).

Hypothesis #3: SDB is prevalent yet under recognized in this patient population.

Research Design:

This is an observational study with a built in double blinded prospective randomized interventional substudy of a potential confounder i.e. atrial pacing. All patients will receive CRT with defibrillator for clinical indications (CRT-D). Investigators other than the EP physicians as well as patients will be blinded to the pacing mode. After screening and a run in period of back up pacing a baseline polysomnogram (PSG) will be performed. Patients will be randomized between atrial overdrive or atrial tracking pacing modes for six months, all patients receiving CRT. Sleep studies will be performed at baseline and at three month intervals. Subjects: Patients referred for implantation of CRT -D will be recruited for this trial. Patients are included only if they are indicated for such a device on clinical grounds. Outcome Measures: 1.Sleep quality related Parameters:The following will be collected at times of each PSG: MAP-PSQI, PSG parameters of sleep quality and architecture, apnea hypopnea index, and oxygen saturation as well as biochemical markers of sleep efficiency. 2.Heart Failure Parameters: The following will be obtained at times of each PSG: Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire, Clinical and echocardiographic measures of heart failure progression and biochemical markers of heart failure severity.

Power Analysis: An improvement in SDB in both initial randomization arms is assumed, however we further assume the atrial overdrive arm will offer improvement over the atrial tracking arm of equal magnitude. An arbitrary estimate would be twenty percent improvement in atrial overdrive arm. The corresponding estimate is 40% improvement due to CRT. To achieve 0.80 power thirty four data sets need to be collected.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

19

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15240
        • VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients presenting to the electrophysiology service of the VAPHS for CRT implant are eligible.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18years

  • Indication for CRT device implant:

    • Congestive heart failure (NYHA Class III or IV)
    • Ejection fraction less than 36%
    • Evidence of intraventricular dyssynchrony (QRS duration >120ms or positive tissue doppler echocardiogram).
    • Have a life expectancy of at least 6 months
    • Are on optimal pharmaceutical therapy (OPT)
  • Ability and willingness to sign informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unstable angina, Canadian Cardiac Society Class III or greater.
  • Patients with unstable heart failure defined as need for intravenous inotropes or inability to achieve stable medical regimen for 48 hours.

  • Deterioration in CHF at any time during the study requiring hospital admission and any of the following:

    • A significant change in pharmaceutical regimen (see below: Pharmacologic Therapy)
    • A change in pacing mode parameters (with the exception of if the mode is inadvertently programmed incorrectly at implant)
    • A need for inotrope support
    • A downward change in functional class by one grade at discharge
  • Women of childbearing age who are pregnant or who refuse pregnancy test and reliable contraception means for the duration of the study.
  • Not having a successful percutaneous CRT device implant.
  • Chronic atrial fibrillation.
  • Patients currently known to have sleep apnea for which they are being treated with CPAP. (Patients prescribed to CPAP who have not been compliant for one month or greater are eligible for enrollment.)
  • AHI >50 on any PSG or portable sleep study.
  • Mean nocturnal heart rate > 80 bpm on baseline PSG will exclude from randomization.
  • Patients receiving, narcotics or benzodiazepines unless on stable doses.
  • Current alcohol or narcotic abuse as documented in the patient medical record.
  • Inability or unwillingness to sign informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
A
CRT programmed to VDD pacing mode
B
CRT programmed to DDD with overdrive pacing based on first night average sinus rate.
Device: CRT with atrial overdrive pacing
Both groups receive CRT, one group receives atrial overdrive pacing

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System

Collaborators

University of Pittsburgh
Boston Scientific Corporation

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alaa Shalaby, MD, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 24, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 24, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

August 28, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 18, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2012

Last Verified

September 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 02345

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Congestive Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on CRT with atrial overdrive pacing

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Azerbaijan

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe